ITT we say shit reddit historians would say

>Hitler was a christian
>i am indeed a neo pagan

Why don't you go to reddit and ask them instead?

>ITT we say shit reddit historians would say
>>Hitler was a christian
>>i am indeed a neo pagan

>>ITT we say shit reddit historians would say
>>>Hitler was a christian
>>>i am indeed a neo pagan

Hitler identified as a Christian.

There is literally nothing wrong with neo-paganism, as long as you actually care about the theology and culture behind it.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but I have never heard this before and I find it baffling. (Same with the KKK, how they can just ignore the part about Jesus being a jew, and many of the church's founders also being jewish, etc)

Are these threads supposed to be ironic? The quality of discourse on r/askhistorians blows this shithole out of the water.

No, it's LARPers attacking a strawman because the Pope they hate won't let them burn single women.

they need an enemy

source?

Neo-paganism doesn't have any actual theology or philosophy behind it.

There is no discourse on askhistorians. 1 in every 100 threads has any sort of discussion.

>Neo-paganism doesn't have any actual theology or philosophy behind it.
Most neo-paganism doesn't, but paganism did.
That's why I specificed neo-pagans who care abotu this sort of thing and not larping.

No he didn't. He was an atheist; and in private criticized it
>you can only quote from sources; no theorizing on your own
>good
Hola, redditor kun

>No he didn't. He was an atheist; and in private criticized it
No, he said in public speeches he was a Christian.

>you can't pull shit completely out of your ass like i do
>bad

Tell us more about the evils of atheism.

You think this is funny?

There's a difference between pulling theories out of your ass and having actual discourse on what might have happened.

But I wouldn't expect a redditor like you to know the difference

No.

>and in private criticized it
He criticized Catholicism. He believed in providence and wasn't an atheist.