>Aventador - 217mph
>LaFerrari - 217mph
>Ford GT - 205mph
>918 - 211mph
>P1 - 218mph
Why are modern supercars so damn slow?
>Aventador - 217mph
>LaFerrari - 217mph
>Ford GT - 205mph
>918 - 211mph
>P1 - 218mph
Why are modern supercars so damn slow?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
muh downforce
They should be even slower. The top speed wars handicapped aero and gearing to do something nobody who owns the car will ever do, but limited performance in all areas the car will actually be used in
The ACR and NSX are proving that no matter how well balanced a car is, people like straight lines.
because downforce is way more important for what theyre used dor
>NSX - 191mph
Terrible
The ACR gets a pass for having enough downforce to drive upside down
LaFerrari reaches it's top speed a hell of a lot faster than the rest.
ACR is hardly road worthy with stiff suspension, minimum interior. NSX is V6 garbage.
>Faster than the LFA around Leguna Seca
>1 second behind RUF RT12 on the Nurbergring
>0.2 seconds slower than the Koenigsegg CCR on the Hockenheim Short
>Terrible
You're right, what was I thinking
...
>Pagani Huayra - 238mph
>Bugatti Chiron - 261mph
>Koenigsegg 1:1 - 273mph
Fast enough
I cant really think of much perhaps they weigh a bit more
but that should not matter when it comes to top speed given places like nardo
could just be the McLaren does not have much focus on handling
its track is narrow to give it a small frontal area
also it has really short overhangs
seems on point
also tires are a bit larger than they used to be
but that would only be a little difference in rolling resistance
the best mac ?
>those scratches
shit detailer
surprised they did not catch that
McLaren normally has some sort of paint autism even on their old cars
It's not like you can go 240mph anywhere. Might as well improvd everything else on the ride so you can have an enjoyable ride under 200.
but then what will Veeky Forums benchracers talk about
>oh yeah, the 12348239487239487234th corvette vs gtr thread
>land of the free
>highways have speed limits
:^)
>struggling to hit 180 mph
only GM fangirls complain about those, surely you arent one right boy
>abiding by the law like a cuck
>slows down after seconds in fear of getting caught
:^)
>breaks down because Italian
>having to slow down anyways because you've reached the end of your tiny shitty country.
>slows down because refugee camp
etc.
Good job there Costanza
Yeah I sincerely hope they do have speed limits. Social prohibitions aren't there because behavior is dangerous. They're there because they are the road to danger. You're not gonna die the second you go over the speed limit. What teenagers and similarly impulsive people do is conclude there's no danger at all once they cross the line and nothing happens.
Driving at that speed is unsafe. There's no need to explain why; you people know it's unsafe, why it's unsafe and what's going to happen when things go wrong. You do it anyway. It's essentially the textbook definition of imprudence. Hope the man takes away your driving licenses and gives you an expensive fine for it. If you want to do that shit then go drive actual racing cars in actual race tracks. Just get the fuck out of the roads I drive in.
>b-but it's my right to have fun while driving
Fuck your fun. Nobody fucking cares about your rights
...
Joke's on you, I'm allowed to go as fast as I want because our roads are built for going fast, our vehicles are inspected for being safe and our drivers are educated in going fast.
Unlike the US of course where cars can be in any operating condition and you basically get your license out of a vending machine.
>ad
Jesus user, get an ad blocker and some self respect pls
Was about to say this, even in dudeweedland where almost half of all cars are anemic sub-60 hp A/B/C segment cars (size smart fortwo to size golf), our highway legal limit is 82 mph? 130 kph anyway. Then people with german plates or business-lease-provided stuff like audi A6 allroad quattro (I swear I see these sooo much, total bros though) or 911's or so who seem to like to think 160 to be a better limit
>Chiron - 288 mph with a top notch luxury leather interior.
b-b-but it's vag shit made by yurocucks
Hasn't done a run yet, why are you quoting figures by marketing monkeys?
How do you suppose this would've squared up?
It would've killed the driver and everyone near the car
Worth.
because as much fun as it is to brag about how fast a car could go there's really no point in making a car be able to go well over 200mph
obviously
>25 year old car has scratches
you don't say
25 year old car that's worth millions of dollars.
Exactly. Salon shows are very telling of paint and polish care, the lighting is both a blessing and a curse. A blessing because it makes it look shinier, but a curse as the many points of refraction bring out the swirls/scratches if there are any.
EU regulations and better cornering
>200+mph
>Slow
>Tfw you can only hit 199
>nigger-mobile
I think you mean Mohammed-mobile
Tyrone can't afford it, and prefers his Navigator anyway
I've gone 140 in my 1.8t Jetta before.
...
>Not killing yourself
cuck desu senpai
.....1988 corvette: 255mph
top fucking lel
>they weigh a bit more
Weight doesn't matter for top speed. See: pigfat Veyron.
>also tires are a bit larger than they used to be
Rolling resistance is completely negligable compared to 200MPH worth of aero drag.
prez/o/ take your pills you autistic sperg
Pretty bad, since it's got racecar tier aero, a limited budget to reduce aero drag, and it was absolutely unhinged.
F1
The F1 was the best looking car ever fucking made. It still looks incredible. My favorite supercar.
LOL BUTTHURT !!
Why the fuck wasn't (this) the back to the future car?
He has been overly autistic these past days, must have changed medication
>No verified performance stats
>shitty one off
>lagged harder than an Australian trying to download a .gif on dialup
>no one has actually seen one of those things move
what does it matter it's not like anyone here will ever have any of these cars