Historically, what do you think lead to the great sexual decline and depression we see today?

yeah but then there chubby fetish will escalate into a chubby shemale sissy domination fetish

The initial liberation lead to tons of fucking, yes. After a while the economic costs of women working full time (i.e. not raising children), and post-liberation divorce/custody laws made is less desirable.

Also, porn and vidya

Rising inequality.

Men can't perform their role as men.

>people have more sex
"I blame womens' liberation"
>people have less sex
"I blame womens' liberation"

>women do not have less sex and even less attention, perhaps men does
wrong. Women are having less sex than the last three generations.

> women love to think of themselves as prude, while being the opposite
Women are prudes compared to men though. It's simple biology.

>Women are having the same amount of sex as before, but with a smaller percentage of men
Not true and you need to learn how averages work.

This is unironically the best explanation ITT. Veeky Forums is such a shit board.

>people have more sex
"I blame womens' liberation"
>people have less sex
"I blame womens' liberation"

>women do not have less sex and even less attention, perhaps men does
wrong. Women are having less sex than the last three generations.

> women love to think of themselves as prude, while being the opposite
Women are prudes compared to men though. It's simple biology.

>Women are having the same amount of sex as before, but with a smaller percentage of men
Not true and you need to learn how averages work.

This is unironically the best explanation ITT.

Men turning gay

>people have more sex
"I blame womens' liberation"
>people have less sex
"I blame womens' liberation"

>women do not have less sex and even less attention, perhaps men does
wrong. Women are having less sex than the last three generations.

> women love to think of themselves as prude, while being the opposite
Women are prudes compared to men though. It's simple biology.

>Women are having the same amount of sex as before, but with a smaller percentage of men
Not true and you need to learn how averages work.

This is unironically the best explanation ITT.

Probably because of porn, free readily-available internet porn.

gay people have lots of sex though.

You are so wrong and uninformed I almost feel bad for you

Then again you seem like one of those guys who think women don't even TALK anout sex, so you're probably a virgin or redditor

Women are on average MORE sexual than men
I wish you knew what goes on in a normal womans head

Keep believing your pure women Disney fantasy, though

>You are so wrong and uninformed I almost feel bad for you
I'm 100% right.

>Then again you seem like one of those guys who think women don't even TALK anout sex
I know fully well that women talk about sex. I also know that they're statistically more likely to feel shame or embarrassment after a one-night stand, even in countries with high levels of "sexual liberation". Hence, they're more prudish than men.

Can confirm

Cite your sources, then

>Women are on average MORE sexual than men
not true, statistically. In fact it's impossible. Aside from gay sex and threesomes sex requires a male and female partner. An increase in one necessitates an increase in the other.

Mistrust of the opposite sex. The propaganda on both sides lead to an inability to make that leap and trust another person of an opposite gender with body and mind.

I'm no virgin, nor am I trying to be misogynistic (and I'm sorry if it does) but honestly, more and more I find myself leery of making any sort of connection with a woman.

Go gay user

It's good fun

While I'm sure that free porn doesnt help, I'm willing to bet that at least some of this issue is due to constant exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals lize atrazine.

I'm not a conservatize or a conspiracy theorist, but it really pains me that people completely refuse to acknowledge that the in utero expose of humans to endocrine disruptors might have something to do with the current increase in transgenderism.

you do know that the normal situation is that men must compete to get girls. it is even more so today since women love to ''discover themselves'' in having lesbian sex.

now today is just that the losers share their pathetic life easily and are less afraid to admit that they must work hard to please pussy.

yes goy, keep being an hedonist

>Cite your sources, then
The Morning after the Night Before : Affective Reactions to One-Night Stands among Mated and Unmated Women and Men.

By Anne Campbell at the university of Durham.

Oh, /pol/.

I meant sources for women also having less sex
That part I can believe, desu

Reminder that girls think they are virgin even when they suck cocks and take cocks in the ass

>I'm not a conservatize or a conspiracy theorist, but it really pains me that people completely refuse to acknowledge that the in utero expose of humans to endocrine disruptors might have something to do with the current increase in transgenderism.
Maybe it does have something to do with transgenderism but what does it have to do with declining sexuality amon millenials?

>Historically, what do you think lead to the great sexual decline and depression we see today?
Hard to get a partner if you don't have your own place.

Hard to get your own place if you can't afford it.

Just about everything about millennials comes down to the economy being far more fucked that it was in previous generations. Especially with skilled labor rapidly being moved outside the country.

Because if you have less sex hormones you wont have as much sex.

>Rising inequality.
>Men can't perform their role as men.

I agree, but not inequality between sexes but inequality between the rich and the poor.

To be seen as desirable in modern western culture, and moreover, to consider themselves as desirable and even present themselves as available, men need access to a certain amount of purchasing power.

It's not just a coincidence that the middle class is vanishing at a similar rate.

> Great sexual decline
Unrealistically high female standards. The current situation is that only ~10% of men would be even considered to be partner material for around 90% of single females. The rest is just the pure maths of impossibility to pair everyone according to how they want it to work in their delusions.

>you do know that the normal situation is that men must compete to get girls
the normal situation is that bandits and noblemen rape all the women

I feel bad for all you people stuck in your negative worldviews
The fact is that getting laid today is easier than ever, most men are just stuck in a negative loop.

If you learn how female psychology works you can become a sex god in just a few months
There are tons of resources out there, learn how to trigger female emotions and you will never have trouble getting girls again

>Sexual Inactivity During Young Adulthood Is More Common Among U.S. Millennials and iGen: Age, Period, and Cohort Effects on Having No Sexual Partners After Age 18
Published in Archives of Sexual Behavior:
The Official Publication of the International Academy of Sex Research

Jean M. Twenge, -San Diego state university
Ryne A. Sherman- Florida Atlantic University
Brooke E. Wells -Widener University

Tried to link the study but Veeky Forums thinks it's spam.

from the abstract:
>Higher rates of sexual inactivity among Millennials and iGen also appeared in analyses using a generalized hierarchical linear modeling technique known as age–period–cohort analysis to control for age and time period effects among adults of all ages. Americans born early in the 20th century also showed elevated rates of adult sexual inactivity. The shift toward higher rates of sexual inactivity among Millennials and iGen’ers was more pronounced among women and absent among Black Americans and those with a college education. Contrary to popular media conceptions of a “hookup generation” more likely to engage in frequent casual sex, a higher percentage of Americans in recent cohorts, particularly Millennials and iGen’ers born in the 1990s, had no sexual partners after age 18.

>"You know how you're naturally disgusted at the thought of rape? Well that's actually fake, cause /pol/ told me, that rape is actually the natural order,"

i never said that the women enjoyed it or that the natural state was desirable

rape is a social construct loved by liberals and libertarians

i don't know what this means

You can just pay the prostitute for sex, if you that desperate for using ebin manipulative techniques.

>>There are tons of resources out there, learn how to trigger female emotions and you will never have trouble getting girls again
well then the negative worldview is to think that t matters to be noticed by a few girls so that they let you try to give them an orgasm.

>rape is a social construct loved by liberals and libertarians
Rape is a social construct but it's still not very pleasant.

>rape is a social construct
Do you mean what's considered rape is socially constructed? That's correct to an extent (ex. drunk sex is only recently considered as such). But there's a base level of sexual violence that is instinctually viewed as wrong (ex. tackling some random girl to the ground, and penetrating her forcefully while she cries). That's why it's a crime in literally every legal system.

>loved by liberals and libertarians

wut

when so many men love to eat pussy, Why are Italian men so against going down on pussy? Are they gay?

>That's why it's a crime in literally every legal system.
it's a crime against certain girls in every legal system

Could you elaborate?

if you rape a virgin then it's rape
if you rape a whore then it's robbery

most of the time rape is property damage against the woman's father or husband

I've read in a different article that the amount of sex partners have increased whereas the amount of sex itself has decreased. Instead of people having a steady relationship in their 20s and fucking every day they now meet 3 different people on tinder in a year and fuck them a couple times.

More partners -> less sex

Why would you spend money on something you can get for free?
Get good enough and women will even start bringing you gifts, paying meals for you, etc.

You still have negative biases about women and relationships
Having a loving girl around is great, I think everyone should work a little to get that

The current system doesn't favor less partners approach.

>The current situation is that only ~10% of men would be even considered to be partner material for around 90% of single females.
This has to be the biggest reddit meme ever.
You do know most women aren't going celibate, nor does Chad keep a massive harem.

Sexual freedom leads to soft harems and eschewing of monogamy, which is the most efficient way to ensure every man gets some.

The opposite is true though

washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/05/06/why-millennials-have-sex-with-fewer-partners-than-their-parents-did/

reminder that the parents are babyboomers or children of baby boomers which means they were having the means of being hedonist.

society is atomized, the internet has become a kind of fake collective simulator, but actual comunity is almost gone

individualistic, liberal lifestiles were all pretty much forced into for shere lack of alternatives, goes directly against basic human tendencies, leaves people neurotic and hyper-selfavare, with masses of invisible boundaries separating people

its not just sex, all basic human contact and conection is going to shit, friendships are rarer than before, family relations more and more fucked up, even our own intrapersonal relation, relation to our self is rapidly deteriorating, you can bet people are generaly more alone, unhappy, frustrated and confused than ever

I dont know about society as a whole but personally I dont bother with women and sex because every time I get rejected it destroys my self-esteem even further and not getting rejected requires too much effort and time. You need to have a job, be in decent shape, be confident, etc. I'd rather have my porn and internet instead, no hassle.

/thread

To have sex, you need community. You cant have community when everyone is more worried about how many likes they have on Facebook, instead of having actual, real friends.

>I dont know about society as a whole but personally I dont bother with women and sex because every time I get rejected it destroys my self-esteem even further and not getting rejected requires too much effort and time. You need to have a job, be in decent shape, be confident, etc. I'd rather have my porn and internet instead, no hassle.
Thank you for finally making a good post

>implying an equal amount of women have sex with an equal amount of men

Third wave feminism.

1. I didn't imply that
2. It's irrelevant to the statistics

Seeing as you mention it though, do you have any evidence that there is a significant imbalance relative to previous generations? Or that there is a significant imbalance at all?

the internet was a mistake

Women know what they want

willing to please hedonists is even more retarded

>Women know what they want
A lot of those are paedo men who go there for boipucci. They're a really big problem for real aid workers.

t. know people who worked in Calais camp

>daily mail

lmao

>>Women are on average MORE sexual than men

Not true. First if you define sexual as having desires/fantasy, perhaps but we will never know this. If you define sexual as having sex, this is NOT true as women are more at risk to lose in heterosexual sex (Pregnancy, being called a whore, stigmatism)

yea right, we all know it was young white females going for bbc while ovulating, dont interject your stupid reality into our cuck fantasies

...

youtube.com/watch?v=aWM4bJNpch0

...

>women are more at risk to lose in heterosexual sex

Yet somehow this does not stop them, almost as if they were preconditioned to want sex at risk of getting pregnant and being stigmatised, like almost as if its not a glitch but a feature

...

...

...

...

alright dude, since youre presenting yourself as the pussy master with unique insights into female psychology, do you have any evidence to support your assertion that women are more sexual than men?

>inb4 anecdotal evidence off all the sluts you've banged

...

...

you have to go back

to where?

>the great sexual decline

But wait I thought we were all "degenerate hedonists." Make up your mind, polfags.

>>/trash/
>>/pol/
>>/mlp/
>>/out/

>muh boogeyman

...

>Lasha Darkmoon

This article is nowhere close to objective to be taken seriously.

We literally have a board dedicated for blaming our problems on people with mutilated penises. That shit belongs there.

Not him, but I remember in Ancient Greece women have been portraited as more lustfull than men. And virtually all of societies limit women to take care of husband and family, while men do the important stuff.

Such limited scope of interest makes sexuality the most exciting activity for a woman.