The Vaticuckan is in a deep crisis, you know. It started so innocent...

The Vaticuckan is in a deep crisis, you know. It started so innocent, with John Paul II going full Obama on canonizations. Then the church accidentally mishandled pedo scandals.

But there is a stop-gap solution. The canonization of that albanian creep.

worldasseenbysandith blogspot se/2016/05/mother-teresa-and-her-untold-story.html

>In 1980 (a year after Nobel), MC falsified the documents of 7-year-old Sonaton Dhar and sold him to a Belgian Catholic couple for Rs. 125,000. This was done based on forged permission from grandmother, and even then that is illegal - child trafficking. Thanks to slavish mentality of Indians, MC escaped prosecution.

Real stand-up gal!

Other urls found in this thread:

web.archive.org/web/20040401141029/http://meteorbooks.com/index.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

INVISIBLE HAND

INVISIBLE HAND

THE FREEMARKET FIXED IT

Rothbard wasn't a capitalist. He was a filthy anarchist. Also a parent doesn't own the child.

As long as laws against slavery & child abuse still exist, is there anything really wrong with the idea of selling kids? Think about people who are infertile but may still want to raise children.

Crusade when.

A crusade against?

>not having fire extinguisher
>reuse disposable latex gloves
>reuse needles after rinsing them in cold water
>washing the dishes in the same place as soiled blankets, sometimes with shit
>can't tell the difference between the steroid Prednisolone and Paracetamol
>five to eight children in one cot, beakers and spoons are shared for every childe, wipe the butts of them with the same cloth

Sure.

Capitalism just means a system of economics based primarily on currency and credit, as opposed to the prior economics, which used gift economy, slavery, serfdom, community distribution, churches, etc. for most economic concerns (see The Great Transformation).

First World Problems: The Post

classical and new liberals have created a Christianity without god, which means just hedonism disguised as progress and ''educating the pleb so that the pleb be free, free as in ''do what you want, entertain yourself'' [without the means to have it, perhaps, but more importantly without being blamed for your actions]. The same people equally dream of making the humanity non-hedonistic. Hedonists are crushed by their hedonism and dream, more so when they are bored, only of making people better, which is precisely being not hedonistic.

after the fall of positivism and their contradictory/ retarded faith in the fantasy of the universality in the human rights plus the fucking abysmal lack of idea of what to do with their creation which is the middle class [beyond making these people work and enjoying themselves outside of work], these people are led to embrace various doctrines for salvation, but more importantly, the doctrine which would save them would still be a doctrine
-which is not Christianity, since liberals have taken powers from Christians [which bring liberals love to hate Christians]
-allows the care free attitude towards the world [''do what you want as long as you pay my taxes''] on a pragmatic level [like people still must be able to go on vacation every few months, to take picture of their shitty meals abroad, sleep around but still feel good for calling fuckers degenerate, listening to music, enjoying yourself watching products from the entertainment industry...]
-still hide enough the above hedonism so that people can feel better about being animals, by pretending to seek a higher power on a weekly basis

THese fuckers have failed to make the middle class something else than clients. these people have tried to make the pleb
-citizens, but it turns out that the fantasy of educating the pleb so that the pleb vote for more classical.new liberalism is super expensive once you have billions of fuckers to convert and even worse, the humanity being hedonistic in nature, people remain hedonistic no matter what
-employees, but employees are disposable by definition and this fantasy is lost
-clients, where people can be moral [=adhering to the human rights] when they buy stuff form amazon or ebay

these liberals have tried to seek salvation in building a society with the asian doctrines, but the asian doctrines are
-foreign the notion of society, like buddhism
-or they say >muh tradition, but the liberals despise the tradition differing form the ''republicanism''

so they are left with the fucking savage societies where ten people eat plants in the amazonia or the jews and the muslism and the sharia which is indeed the best fusion of
-a civil law like any liberal dream of, so that liberal can control their people
-the higher power so that it puts an end to relativism and epxlicit hedonism

the sharia is what chrisitanity has failed to produce, which means it is what the christians without god crave,

Ok, faggots. This is silly.

There's two huge charity outfits in India. The Ramakrishna Mission (1897) and Bharat Sevashram Sangha (1917). Then there's the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (1926), a para-military organization that's considered the parent to Bharatiya Janata Party (1980).

But none of these has any value for the Muggeridges of the world. And none of basic economy has any value for them too. Economy is about using finite means in a rational way.

But the Missionaries of Cuntiness doesn't care about that. They got an assload of money but won't put it to good use. It's fucking amazing that these anti-materialistic cunts who shun materialism have such a hard-on for hogging money.

So yes, this is a problem from the first world not helping anyone at all.

Crusade why? The Christcuck crusades were failures in every sense of the word.

The only Crusade that was successful was one directed against Europeans during the Cathar uprisings. Laughable.

>Capitalism just means a system of economics based primarily on currency and credit

You can have economies that have currency and not be capitalist. You seem a bit confused.

>But the Missionaries of Cuntiness doesn't care about that. They got an assload of money but won't put it to good use. It's fucking amazing that these anti-materialistic cunts who shun materialism have such a hard-on for hogging money.

This is pretty spot-on. Mother Theresa and her charities received a tremendous amount of donations once she became well-known: however, the money was never invested in better facilities or even in improving existing facilities - Mother Theresa literally sent off all the money to the central Vatican authority. For being so critical of materialism, she sure was eager to accumulate wealth and send it off to the Holy See for 'good girl' points - and they, how eager to receive that money, despite their constant pontificating on the evils of materialism.

I beg your pardon?

Obligatory post:

web.archive.org/web/20040401141029/http://meteorbooks.com/index.html

Then they may change partners.

>other charities working on a budget that is far less than Mother teresa have all these things.
yeah, sure.

>RSS
>Para military
the only thing paramilitary about them is their shorts.
Their most high profile work in current day is making shelters for cows that farmers sell off once they are too old to be useful.

Beef is cheaper in india because the most major source isn't cattle grown for consumption, but older farm animals that are now useless.

They are a meme tier organization that wants to return to the good old (mythical) days of hinduism where everyone spoke sanskrit and ran around on aeroplanes.

Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great!

They do.

Whatever. Thing is that RSS is an huge and old outfit.

I was agreeing with you there.
The RSS also is not a charitable organization.

Also, given their meme politics, I can understand if Chatterjee omitted them from his book(s). But that actually increases the weight of his case. Because if he can totally trash MoC by comparing them with RM and BSS, it's like beating the crap out of someone off-hand.

S'okay. The RSS-BJP connection may be cause enough for Chatterjee to omit them.

and then there's also cultural reasons.
but yeah, an organization that actively meddles in politics and not charity isn't really the best example to prove his point.

I really like this story:

> On 11 October 1995, prostitutes in a certain quarter of Calcutta came out in force; they cajoled and coaxed passers-by for money, but not in return for the usual favours. For some reason, they had decided to don white coats, the type worn by doctors, and they made a strange and surreal impact in the midst of the hectic Calcutta street. Each of them had a large collection tin in her hand, which was rattled vigorously as the ladies walked along this congested street in north Calcutta.

>The sex workers were collecting money for flood victims. In September devastating floods had struck large areas of West Bengal, the state in India of which Calcutta is the capital. What made the floods especially poignant was its timing - it had come just before the biggest festival of 70 million Indian Bengalis, the spectacular Durga Pujo. Although in Indian terms, the number of casualties was small, with 200 dead (many of them from snake bites, as is often the case during floods, when snakes and humans climb up to the same elevation), more than three million people were made homeless in the villages surrounding Calcutta. In pure financial terms, the loss was estimated at Rs 1050 million.

There's also similar stories on how Indian prostitutes took part in the polio vaccine-campaign by giving pamphlets to the customers.

yeah, the eradication of polio in india is among one of the best low level mobilizations on a massive scale in history.
I also like the indian government also told muzzie religious authorities to shut the fuck up during the process of vaccination, unlike nearly every thing else.