What are some of most disastrous defeats in history ?

What are some of most disastrous defeats in history ?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ZEHPrYUcoi0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

...

/pol/ trying to defeat Tomaru was more disastrous

cuck

I'd say the degeneration of western society as a whole

I'm not sure what happened in the last 60 years or so but I don't like it.

Battle of Edessa

pakis getting btfo

I feel it's been improving, we are better off now than we were in the 50s.

Did they poo on their designated shitting corpses after the battle?

Degeneration is a meme created by viewing the past with rose-tinted hindsight.

>t. reddit

Dunno mate, but they did capture 90000 prisoners, maybe they were 'browner' when they were released.

like every fifth post on /pol/ yesterday was shills telling people to vote in every single online poll and then reset their ip to do it again
The assravagement was beautiful

>a few dozen shitposters swayed dozens of polls with millions of votes
Must be fun living in your fantasy world.

>last 60 years
Less Jews in western societies means less conservativism and more degeneracy.

>millions of votes

>17,000
>10,000
>5,000

The only one with a massive amount of votes is the one from Breitbart, a what I understand is a dedicated alt right news site.

>what I understand is a dedicated alt right news site.
also a trap, I have a tendency to see most of the shit on /pol/ now as being some sort of strange manipulation.

...

you know, I don't blame them...

Fucking kek

Hi there!

You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of Veeky Forums are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!

Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bait to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!

Memetic artistry on display here

...

Serbian empire! Now I've heard it all.

It was the greatest empire known to man!

Veeky Forums's defeat by /mlp/.

Donald Trump's defeat in the 2016 elections.

can someone tell me what is going on?
what's up with

...

/pol/ is on suicide watch after the Hillary-Trump debate from yesterday

what happened?

Garbage polls that only sampled trump-heads and trolls

Trump got stumped.

Just watch the damn thing

link?
yes I am a spoonfeeding retard.

Like the Romans sitting watching the Empire fall apart while viewing the past with rose-tinted hindsight?

>The assravagement was beautiful

It was wondrous to behold.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZEHPrYUcoi0

>persians captured or killed the whole army
>the WHOLE army
>everyone
>every soldier, engineer, general, strategist, blacksmith, hooker and the emperor to boot

Talk about getting rekt.

>capital: Skopje

How are the macedonians not all over this?

watched the first half hour.
So, trump largely depends emotional appeals?

Not him, but yes. That's been his whole shit since the beginning.

welcome to american politics
it's all like that in one way or another

with hillary it's muh raycism and muh sexism

it was kinda depressing seeing the two discuss their tax shenanigans and emails more passionately than what they are going to do as a matter of policy.

eh, I can deal with sexist bullshit, especially when they get btfo by actual facts like the wage gap.

Someone wanting to cut down regulations to the bare minimum instead of streamlining them and giving the rich tax cuts on the off chance that american labor will become more competitive is a different cup of tea.

After the first 30 minutes Trump relies on acting like a misbehaving small child with an attitude. That's not even an exaggeration.

he looks adorable when he does that desu.

why did the moderator ask several ad hominem questions to Trump yet didn't ask Hillary a single such question?

Maybe Mrs Clinton didn't shoot out bullshit like
>Obama isn't actually an US citizen.

here's one example of the like 20 threads to rig various polls

if you want proof of the rest, use the archives.

>trump supporters aren't allowed to post in polls
Seriously, SJW?

>rigging votes is alright if we do it.

>this is the rhetoric of a trump supporter
Embarrassing. This is a history board though, so I'm not going to give you anymore (You)s. You know, on reddit they have a system for that sort of thing called upvoting. You should check it out -- I hear they have a few very nice Trump subreddits that you'd enjoy.

Can someone explain trickle down economics to me?

sure whatever, but for the sake of a balanced non-bias debate why was she not asked such questions?

you literally just grabbed a screen of someone posting where to vote, wow what damning evidence you have there, they so the same fucking thing on Reddit

>if a trump supporter votes in a poll it means it is rigged
>if a Hillary supporters wins a poll it means it is unbiased
You know a lot about -reddit for someone who claims not to be an SJW

she was asked about her emails. She didn't do the same level of stuff that Trump did to garner a place in the election cycle.
Trump's knowledge of cyberspace is hilariously skewed.
>If a hillary supporter wins a poll it means it is unbiased.
never said that.

If you give money to only rich people, it eventually ends up in the hands of the lower classes, because they use the money to grow the economy and pay people with that money, resulting in better jobs and wages for the lower classes. Half of the argument comes from claiming we're on the wrong side of the Laffer curve, and the other is that rich people won't just find a way to use the money to make themselves richer at the expense of the lower classes.

Because then you end up with someone trying to get away with as much bullshit as possible and claiming the media is being unfair to you because they aren't being balanced.

kek rigging the polls and pretending you didn't do it doesn't change the fact that 100 million+ people watched trump get dismantled

better start working on those excuses about how the election was rigged

Don't worry, his 10 year old son is really good with computers. In a few years he'll be old enough to start posting on /b/ and join anonymous, the ultimate 400lb hacker terrorists.

How did /pol/ rig the polls, /r/hill4prez?

>I made NATO create a counter terrorist task force.

>tfw your dad catches you cybering but you tell him cybering just means youre really good with computers and he doesnt know any better and tells everyone you are really good at the cyber on national tv

>/r/his/ believes that /pol/ voting in polls is rigging
>but the DNC rigging the votes in favor of Hillary isn't rigging
Pathetic

Veeky Forums just thinks the online polls aren't worth much. If Syrian refugees actually had iphones and were as numerous as /pol/ claimed, Hillary would be beating trump 7:1 though.

>I have a better sense of judgement and temperament than she does.
>everyone laughs.

>polls only matter when Hillary wins
You people aren't even hiding it anymore

Polls matter when they're representative samples of what they're trying to represent.

>skew a poll online because your candidate got BTFO.
>this somehow means anything.

Did you really watch the first 30 minutes? Because there's no emotional appeals from either side. Do you even know what an emotional appeal is?

>I can deal with sexist bullshit, especially when they get btfo by actual facts like the wage gap.
What reality have you been living in? When have facts ever mattered or been able to "btfo" any liberal politics? The fact that most immigrants have nothing to do with any civil war in the ME or that they're young males instead of whole families or that they're uneducated instead of "highly skilled", none of the reality has caught up with politicians in the EU. None of it has stopped them from using these misconceptions as arguments for perpetually pushing for more immigration.

>giving the rich tax cuts
Companies. He spoke about companies, not individuals.

Look, the rich aren't paying their taxes anyway, so increasing them doesn't make sense. And if you start coercing them into paying as Hillary plans, you'll drive them away completely.

When have socialist policies ever done well? Look at Detroit. Prime example of how one of the most productive and industrious cities wasn't a match for decades of socialist rule. The same is going to happen on the whole country scale if you keep chasing higher minimum wages and regulations and tax increases.

He absolutely lost it after the first two segments. He actually got to Clinton pretty in the beginning and made her stutter and and jam up. But unfortunately it went downhill as the debate progressed and he mucked it up. But he fucked it up himself, not because Hillary suddenly became better.