Romans pretty much allow freedom of religion in their empire...

>Romans pretty much allow freedom of religion in their empire. They dont force their subjects to worship Jupiter or whatever

>The Mongols also are very tolerant to the various religions practiced within their empire

>"DUDE MUSLIMS WERE GREAT! They never forced anyone in their empire to convert, they just made them pay a tax! They also made them crawl on their hands and knees and humiliate and beat them while they paid this tax! They were so tolerant!"

why do cucks peddle this bullshit as if they were so fucking nice?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkestan_cockroach
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizya
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Are you saying that it isn't true and Mongols were deeply zealous people or what?

Because they fear terrorists.

>romans
>tolerant ovf other religions
So thats why they razed the Second Temple of David Khan and the local Christians turned it into a garbage zone before the righteous Muslims came and restored it to glory?

And don't get me started when they created the meme of christianity and started to persecute any pagan not following it by destroying their temples or just out killing them.

Because Muslims are hypocrite butthurt people who like portraying themselves as peaceful, if you say they are violent they will kill you so don't do that

>Romans pretty much allow freedom of religion in their empire.
Except Christians.

The Roman Empire loses a lot of it's fun after it becomes Christian.

romans are pagans, they're not exactly tolerant, just that they believe other god aside from their deities exist too, but assigned to another nation

because the mongols kills indiscriminately

muslims are tolerant at that age compared to christian europe and pretty much most of the world at the time

>Romans attack jews after they rise up in Rebellion to their Roman masters

>judaism isnt made illegal or anything after this conflict either

go murder a 9 year old girl because she learned how to read

Yes, but it persecuted Christians, mostly starting with Nero.

...

>So thats why they razed the Second Temple of David

The Romans were perfectly content to let the Jews follow their own religion: it's the fault of the Jews. They're the ones that rebelled three times.

>DUDE MUSLIMS WERE GREAT!
They're being compared to bloodthirsty Mesopotamians, not actually tolerant people.

>muslims are tolerant at that age compared to christian europe

lol no

Well duh. Any logical person would've banned Christianity at the time considering the threat it posed.

There was a legal reason for that i.e. their crimes.

>judaism isnt made illegal or anything after this conflict either
As long as you don't practice it inside Rome, since Tiberius banned it completely and pay the fiscus judaicus in the newly renamed land of Syria-Palestina that was do distance themselves from their heirtage.

Romans generally didn't give a fuck about other cults. The problem with Christian is that they openly refused to worship emperors as living gods, dominus et deus. This was an absolute must for all subjects of Rome regardless of their spiritual beliefs. If you refused you were immediately accused of treason against the emperor, so the prosecution of Christians was pretty much more of political nature, and less of religious.

To be fair the Romans did ban and persecute the Druids in their empire. Then again they did deserve it.

butthurt muslim revisionists

except from small cases like some few trading cities around spain and italy, like palermo, venice, etc. europe is pretty much less intolerant and diverse compared to muslim citites

Mongolians were cool guys. They raped your woman and NOT burn your monastery. They also killed 10 percent of the world population, but I mean you guys should have surrendered when you had the chance, like what the fuck it's their fault. If they fight back, than mongolians had to kill those petty shit posters. And about Roman and Muslims? They are a bunch of petty ass losers compared to my waifu Genghis Khan.

>bin Blatta

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkestan_cockroach

Well memed my friend, well memed.

I think slavs are generally much more intolerant than Southern Europe.

>They dont force their subjects to worship Jupiter or whatever
>implying the Romans wouldn't kill you if you didn't pray for the good of the emperor

no

>intolerant
*inferior

That's a real small ask senpai.

Hebrews and Mosleums have a lying clause built in for shit like that. Christcvcks should've gotten theirs.

>Romans pretty much allow freedom of religion in their empire. They dont force their subjects to worship Jupiter or whatever

About that... the state did not do that but it was very common for the trade guilds of the era to force the subject. If you did not go along with that they would not let you join and make it very hard for you to work in that profession. They were also de facto parts of the cults of Minerva, Jupiter, or more rarely other Roman gods. Also the state granted rights to the collegia opificum so... the Roman state just took a round about and passive aggressive means of making you worship Jupiter.

Just saying.

Huh. Neat. Better than two taxes, getting humiliated, and then getting cucked.

>made them crawl on their hands and knees and humiliate and beat them while they paid this tax! They were so tolerant!"

Really going to need a source senpai. You're welcome for correcting the record.

>measuring civilizations by how nice they were

The more people you can tolerate the more you can exploit; I wasn't under the impression anybody thought this was "nice".

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizya

The humiliation part really changed from area to area.

I don't think anyone claims that Muslims were great purveyors of religious freedom or anything, but they were certainly better than the Christians of their time and have historically been much more tolerant than their current reputation would have people believe, which I'm pretty sure are the only two points really being made when this is brought up.

Would rather live in Cordoba than Paris in 1000 as a Jew desu

Even as certain sects of Christianity it would have been better under Muslim rule. They didn't see protestant or catholic or anabaptist etc. they saw christian only.

It is well know that the Mongols and pre-Christian Romans were religiously tolerant. The Muslim empires are seen as having been generally more tolerant than their neighbors.

They went after the Druids because the Druids were extremely influential political and religious class who refused more-or-less point-blank to play ball. If they'd kissed the ring instead of telling the Romans to go fuck themselves they might still be around.

>Romans pretty much allow freedom of religion in their empire. They dont force their subjects to worship Jupiter or whatever
Topkek.

The word "martyr" literally arose from the thousands of Christians burned, quartered, crucified, dismembered and beheaded by the Romans for refusing to worship their Gods. It is also the origin of the word "Atheist" (someone who rejected the Roman Gods).

Too bad you "pretty sure" that "nobody is doing thaaat!" because I've seen people claim that Muslim tolerance was almost on par with the modern West, both on major publications and on Veeky Forums. People don't really put much thought into what they're saying if what's being said agrees with their comfier thoughts.

thats, what you see. the problem is some people looking at medieval muslims the same way muslims act today, say whatever you want but they're vastly different back then, although to be fair they maybe exaggerated it a bit so people like you could tell the difference

The persecution of Christians was also populist in nature, namely on perceiving that Christianity is a blood cult or something sinister like that, because they liked to congregate in random hidden places and spouted strange Eastern sermons with "blood" and "flesh".