This is the only good Ferrari ever made. Prove me wrong

This is the only good Ferrari ever made. Prove me wrong.

>ProTip: you can't.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tpht4k_VBhE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

I can't, it's literally the only one I like

yet its worse than pretty much every newer supercar tier Ferrari

overrated pleb machine tbqh

...

...

>good
>Ferrari
There's the flaw in your argument.
If you said least shit Ferrari this thread would be given a chance.

Most overrated, overpriced piece of shit ever

I always liked the testarosa more. It looks a bit more charming.

its ugly, uncomfortable and doesnt even go that fast by todays standards

Just because it's the best doesn't mean it's the only good one

Consider yourself disproven.

I swear 70's and 80's super car rear ends were the best.
You got the upswept design with visible exhaust and you usually caught a glimpse of suspension and differential.

...

Those light grey exits cant be the fucking exhausts can they??

wastegate. There was lots of turbocharging going on with the CTR

You wrong.

No way, that car has nothing but problems.
It wobbles at higher speeds, the panels rattle and can come unglued.
And you can't see shit out of it, so changing lanes is a great way to get killed.
It was incredibly fast for it's time, but it can't really compete with the cars they put out later.

Ferrari F150

>spotted the millenial middle-eastern

It's like the Cobra: a bare-bones minimalist sports car.

Remember the Italians (and most sports car enthusiasts) don't consider what others call sports cars to be sports cars.

To sports car fans, a sports car is a bare-bones machine made solely for performance.

Everything else is a GTB or GTS.

288 GTO > F40

Sex

You're right OP, I can't.

...

>Bare bones, pure enthusiast pleasure
>Turbo

Pick one

Nice Ford.

they had different ideas about aerodynamics back then
in the 60s lift and drag reduction was the goal
then towards the 70s down-force starts to come into play

>ProTip: get fucked op

youtube.com/watch?v=tpht4k_VBhE

Hate me all you want but I like the GTC4Lusso a lot. If I was a millionaire I'd definitively make it my daily driver.

Saw a 612 here last week.
Sweet ride

unsure if the FF and this are different cars, but fuck yeah shooting brakes

>Never won Le Mans

F40fags BTFO!

Nice Diablo.

>shooting brake
Two door station wagon nigga. No one is taking their dogs and rifles to go hunting on the estate in one of those.

Why not? It's not crazy low, it has pretty much the same ground clearance than a normal luxury car

>Ferrari LaFerrari
>Ferrari FXX
>Ferrari FXXK
>Ferrari 599XX Evo.
>Ferrari F12 Berlinetta
>Ferrari GT4C Lusso
>Ferrari 250 GTO
>Ferrari 288GTO
>Ferrari Enzo Ferrari
>Ferrari 458 Speciale
>Ferrari 488GTB

Choose any of the above.

...

>mfw choosing between Diablo and Mythos in TDIII

the only right answers plus mine, anything else sans the tractors is normie tier.

Why no love for the Scuderia?

You wrong

Are you all just being edgy contrarians?

My bad. Since it's a contrarian thread, I'll have a blue one.

They're somewhat different ones

There are two versions of the GTC4; one with the naturally-aspirated 12-cyl and AWD, and another one with two-wheel-drive and the usual V-8 twin turbo ecoboost-clone more and more sports car producers are using.

Dont like the big flat space behind the rear window. It looks like they had no idea as how to finish the car design.

Can you guess why the Ferrari-snobs consider this car so important for Ferrari?

>Can you guess
Nope. Please enlighten.

>Ferrari-snobs
People who own Ferraris?
Have a high opinion of them?
Like them to exclusion, what?

It's the first Ferrari NOT designed by Pininfarina, Scaglietti, or anyone else, and is the first designed in-house by Ferrari itself.

>It's the first Ferrari NOT designed by Pininfarina, Scaglietti, or anyone else
Really?
It shows.
So, Ferrari is of the opinion that those styling houses were dead weight, and they should've been doing all of the design themselves?

Because I can't really say I agree

The 488 was also designed in-house even though it's just a re-tooling of the 458.

That's why it lacks the Pininfarina badging too.

That's not the F50

I wouldn't have fucked with a good thing.
For me, Pininfarina was one of the biggest reasons their cars looked so amazing. I wanted a 328 at one time, and their styling of it was key.

Sports cars are gay

Except it's looks aged like dog shit. Everytime I look at it I like it less.

Scuderia has a very dated design too. The headlights look way too small for the car and it appears to sit very high.

Gorgeous timeless design

I'm interested to see how this design ages. Currently I like it a decent amount, even if it does seem a little overly busy

>Scuderia has a very dated design
Meh, I'd prefer to drive that over a 512 or an F40, although if I was given a choice of car, I'd take the F40, as I could sell it for the most.

As a daily, I'd absolutely agree.

For any other reason than dailying I will be taking an F40 please.

Although, if I was told I would be given an F40 free of charge but I had to daily it, I absolutely would.

Probably location dependent.

It's crowded enough where I live that I have to fight through some of that freeway/traffic bullshit just to get to the good roads. That part is hard enough to do in mine, much less one it's hard as fuck to see out of, like an F40.

If I had great roads at my door, I'd switch though.