Would Africa be more "peaceful" if its nations existed along ethnic borders...

Would Africa be more "peaceful" if its nations existed along ethnic borders, rather than the borders forced upon them by colonization?

Other urls found in this thread:

nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-wars-ravaging-africa-2016-14993
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Congo_War
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Hell no making the blacks slowly forget their tribal roots is what is keeping Africa in peace, the Rwanda Genocide is what happens when blacks remember their roots.

Africa is pretty peaceful though. Can you name a single major war that has taken place in Africa?

Your definition of "peaceful" is in serious need of revision.

nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-wars-ravaging-africa-2016-14993

>"In 2014, Africa experienced more than half of worldwide conflict incidents, despite having only about 16 percent of the world population."

WW1? WW2?

No those ethnic groups were fighting all the goddamn time. It might be more low-intensity, I suppose.

Well we aren't there forcing them to keep those borders so they should stop blaming whitey for all their own shit.

> Ethnic
> African
> Federacy

Great War of Africa

...

Oh you mean those wars forced onto africa by bloodthirsty European savages?

try again m8

Is that map legit?
Isn't most of north africa either arab or berber?

>Can you name a single major war that has taken place in Africa?

That map is fucking bonkers. If we apply its logic to the other continents there'd probably be over a hundred thousand countries on Earth.

No one knows what they are ducking talking about. Op when you are talking about anything historical that is the western world in the last 100 years you are best to actually go elsewhere or Google that shit up.

Do these look like people who'll settle down once their "tribal borders" are returned?

Wtf you have no understanding of the Rwandan genocide and it's causes.

> it's causes.
It's cause. Which is eternal white and colonization.

Of course not, are you stupid? God.

South Sudan is literally the two leaders profiting off the war. People don't fight for no fucking reason spontaneously and you'd have to be retarded to think so.

Its cause was Tutsi and Hutu hate eachother and thus try to wipe eachother out.

The cartographer confused tribes with ethnicities, which makes Africa look way more diverse than it is

'Berber' covers about 20 groups.

but still im pretty sure egypt is pretty homogenous with copts and arabs

It was a result of the German and Belgian colonial policies, extremely cancerous anthropology and culmination of it those factors post independence and the UN doing nothing despite the massive warnings internally and externally (showcasing the security council flaws) and France being extremely douchey.

As an African, that map is making my eyes bleed

Yeah we Twi speakers like shit talking each other but we consider ourselves one nation, like all the different regions of old Germany

I demand more Ivory Coast clay, and almost the entirety of south Ghana

I love how ethnonationalism is considered the solution to Africa's problems but in Europe its the greatest sin.

t. not even /pol/

> greatest sin
What are you speaking about? Everyone praised Scotland separatists.

Ethnonationalism is a meme

that's because 'white' isn't an ethnicity

Literally who is everyone? Nobody praised them.

>The cartographer confused tribes with ethnicities

No he didn't, you did.

Africa is a racist continent it has no diversity as at its just fucking niggers and sandniggers yet we are the racist ones because we dont want them in our countries.

Everybody was creaming themselves over free Tibet

i keked

Are you fucking kidding me? Damn this physically hurt to read.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Congo_War

>The Tswana people are clearly split into their 7 tribes
No

The resurgent Scottish nationalism isn't ethnic nationalism you dumbo. If they were ethnic nationalist they would have been most likely banned or something

And yet people railed against UKIP with accusations of ethno-nationalism, despite the fact that they had/have more ethnic minority candidates than any other party.

Do these look like people who'll settle down once they get their "lebensraum" returned?

>africa is pretty peaceful though

>african borders based around ethnic lines
>ethnic group now = country
>legitimate political reasons to now utterly genocide other ethnic groups

realistically there'd be the same number of countries, except with significantly more genocide.

And they said Brexit would mean more commonwealth migration (non-whites) while european migration would be severely cut.

>UKIP
>ethnic nationalists

Why blacks? Surely the Balkans shows that whites are just as much subject to ethnic tensions as other racial groups.

Same could be said for the Balkans after the Berlin Congress, but what's stopping these people from adapting to a newly found environment?

No, but they'll settle the fuck down when we break their country into two and make them suck our cultural and economic dick for decades