GET A DOGBOX. SOUND LIKE A RACECAF, SHIFT LIKE A PRO
6-speed sequential gearbox
Nathaniel Gonzalez
Other urls found in this thread:
Charles Walker
Rather have a new gm 10 speed with a full manual valve body and ratchet shifter.
Nolan Williams
too bad its a lot heavier than a standard. i personally like these. weighs about the same as a T10, and takes abuse like a pro
Jackson Rogers
Never really been worried about weight, I'm not
Anthony Mitchell
i like to turn, weight always matters.
plus, im not fat.
i can not imaging having a car that weighs more than 2600lbs with a full tank.
plus i like my v8's
Gabriel Gomez
Have fun driving a plastic toy car.
Aaron Butler
>All this stupidity
>Implying a new Ford/GM 10Lwhatever will hold as much as a proper dogbox
>Implying they even make manual valvebodies for those
>Implying they even make ratchet shifters for those
>Implying a ten speed ratchet shifter wouldn't be impractical as fuck
>implying they don't have huge masses of reciprocating inertia
>implying they don't have big efficiency losses
>implying more weight = better, even if you have more horsepower
>implying that new 10 speed won't be a steaming pile of horseshit just like the 8L90
Josiah Price
Implying you have a car
John Evans
>Implying you understand engineering at all (seriously? 10 speed ratchet shifter?)
>Implying 2 wheels aren't superior to 4
>Implying you cannot into le meme arrows
Ayden Fisher
>not having a manual planetary transmission
Owen Gutierrez
>I'd prefer the crushing disappointment of a commuter tier fluid coupling than a master race mechanical coupling
Tits or GTFO
Lucas Reyes
Zachary Wright
id rather have a dogleg tranny bruh
Evan White
You have clearly never driven a manual valve body.
Ryder Myers
Plenty. Still just a one trick pony slushbox.
You've clearly never driven a sequential dog box.
Landon Miller
So put a low stall torque converter.
You will still shift way faster in the auto, even against a clutchless sequential whatever.
Anthony Howard
Dogbox/straight cut manuals are awesome - when you are 100% on the gas. Driving around normally they are terrible. I fantasized about a Jerico for years until I drove one.
Angel Bell
>You will still shift way faster in the auto, even against a clutchless sequential whatever
Even IF you could measure the difference in shift speed between a manual valve bodied hydromatic slushbox versus a dogbox (you can't), you're still going to be faster in gear with the clutch driven manual.
Not to mention better vehicle speed control on overrun, which is handy if you're doing more than simply accelerating from a standing standing start (literally the only advantage of an auto).
Dominic Morris
>dogleg
Dogbox you idiot. Dogleg is a shift pattern.
Properly made ones, like in motorcycles, are great though.
Sebastian Harris
>You will still shift way faster in the auto, even against a clutchless sequential whatever.
No. A true clutchless sequential is instantaneous: it directly goes from one gear to the next, without interruption. There is no disruption of power. There's a reason F1 uses this, but with electrohydraulic components for getting rid of the relatively slow mechanical linkage.
Jaxon Perez
>6-speed sequential gearbox from factory.
Cagers BTFO yet again. You mad white boi?
Logan Lee
>A true clutchless sequential is instantaneous
No. There needs to be a slight delay so the gears can mesh together. The delay is so small (~50ms?) that it's almost instantaneous but not quite. A DCT or manual bodied auto can engage two gear packs at a time and flip between the two which is faster.