Does a 2jz swapped STI destroy the point of a subaru?

Does a 2jz swapped STI destroy the point of a subaru?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=mfuE00qdhLA
youtu.be/csLD1MGskfI
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

The engine is not the point of a subaru.

Forgot to add RWD conversion as well

Does it still have a working alternator and electrical system? You need those to charge the vape...

smooth

>Does a 2jz swapped STI destroy the point of a subaru?
>RWD conversion
Yes.

without boxer and awd, the only significant thing is (was) frameless windows.

AWD is dumb anyways
More driven wheels != better

Better grip and stability at the cost of a little understeer

And added weight, and more parts to break, and computers that malfunction.
On dry pavement why bother.

>On dry pavement why bother.
*hey Jamie pull up that webm, you know the one

So instead of oversteering and not crashing I would have understeered into a brick barrier?
I'm gonna stick with the former.

You would have kept traction and grip while not nearly rolling off a cliff

Why would awd mean I keep traction? There was no throttle being applied, that was entirely caused by jerking the wheel and hitting the brakes causing rotation

Because of the extra grip and power being distributed to the four wheels, you might have been able to save that overreaction without spinning out

having better tyres will grip better than more moving wheels
m.youtube.com/watch?v=mfuE00qdhLA

>power being distributed
There was no power being applied, that was a steep downhill, I wasn't even touching the gas at any time in that video

>would removing one of the main selling points of a car destroy the point of it
made me thunk

Not being a real man and building an eg33 and retaining all wheel drive

youtu.be/csLD1MGskfI
No.

Gee I wonder why you oversteered. I guess there's no platform that will save shitty driving.

it'd be easier and cheaper to just buy a car that came stock with a 2jz

>crashes at 5mph
KEK

I never crashed tho