Giulia 200HP vs Jaguar XE 200 HP vs BMW 320 vs A4 190 HP

Which would you rather choose for about the same price?

>eurocuckboxes

just get an ecoboost mustang or a focus RS

jag or 3 series.

>Giulia 200HP vs Jaguar XE 200 HP

The only contest here, the Audi will be horrible to drive/sit in/live with and the BMW is way overpriced without being able to justify it

this

>just get something with two doors or head gasket failure

I like the Mustang a lot but it's not relevant here, and the RS is a Sonic-on-wheels meme machine with a reddit-level drift button, please don't encourage it

id lease the alfa. if buying, prob the bmw (i assume it's got the strongest resale value?)

audi actually has the nicest interior. but it’s the worst to drive.
bmw will have the best driving characteristics, jag is a good all rounder.

the headgasket failure is fixed

also

>le red.dit boogeyman

>audi actually has the nicest interior
until the rattles start

>complains about eurocuckboxes
>tells him to get a eurocuckbox
irony

the focus rs is not a cuckbox

euro-Ford is dead, Ford is one hundred percent American

also

see
plus super hard seats, bad material choice and ugly dash design (all imo)

>headgasket failure is fixed
should be, should never have happened to such expensive cars anyway

focus rs is still too small to be relevant in this comparison

Maybe, but I really arent upset about that.

I only want a trustable and with good reliance car.

Aeathetically, I like more the Giulia and the XE

>I only want a trustable and with good reliance car.
Why are you even considering the Giulia then?

Because I love it aesthetically.

I mean if those were really my only choices then I would go with the Giulia I guess, if only because it's kinda novel and interesting. I'd rather support more competition than seeing the same BMW 3-series all the time.

With that being said, with how much these shits cost I'd much rather just buy a WRX and be done with it. Even if I wanted a slightly nicer interior I could get the performance pack or limited for under $30k, but these days even the 2018 Premium has some decent features for close to $26k or $27k and will outperform and be more rewarding to drive than any of those other cars that cost $10k+ more.

The problem is that the WRX is here 10K more expensive than the others.

An EG Civic, and the rest goes into rebuilding it.

Save up a bit for a Camaro SS 1LE

320 if the government let you tune the engine because 200hp on a turbo 2l is malaise era tier bullshit otherwise get a GTI. The GLI is crap.

>bmw
>4 cylinder engine
that's somehow worse than getting a mustang with a 4 cylinder engine

The Alfa.

...

BMW also sells cars with 6.6 liter engines
Which is absolute madmen tier in 2018
So yeah it is a premium brand.

We now misure the "premiumness" judging based on the engine displacement?

Interesting.

>pic related: a premium brand and car

If those were my only choices, the Alfa.

If I'm going to have to drive some yurobox, I'll pick the one that literally every nail salon owner doesn't have.

None of them above
I rather go for the Lexus

well the italian fanboy who created this meme sure thinks so.

Historically BMW has had terrible resale, the 750i actually holds the record the the most rapid depreciation in % terms ever, at least where I live. For resale it would be the Jag or bust.

Jag
A4
BM
Alpha Romeo

>, prob the bmw (i assume it's got the strongest resale value
Only meme models (so no).

I don’t see why people pick the alfa. I’d love a QV but the OP is talking about pedestrian trimmed versions of these cars; why would you put up with all alfa romeo’s pitfalls without any reward? The QV is amazing but the base model to me is pointless.

Jag actually drives better and rides better than the bmw. It has a more complex and expensive rear suspension

dogshit > the fiat