Do you guys see syncretism in the future of Christianity and Islam in the next thousand years...

Do you guys see syncretism in the future of Christianity and Islam in the next thousand years? Is a fusion of the semitic religions into a general ''Abrahamism'' possible or plausible in any way?

Who Zensunni here?

absolute heresy

no, they are toxic to each other

Islam is way too fundamentalist and opposed to inter-religious dialogue to believe any syncretism, even accidental, could happen.

Furthermore, Christianity is too attached to dogma and universalism to do the same.

pls. Orange Catholic or gtfo.

goes for those Zenshiite shit heads too.

>next thousand years

Chrislam is already a thing

Jesus christ, how the hell would this happen when we already have hundreds of splinter groups within christianity and to a lesser extent islam?

What would a Christian-Islam hybrid even look like?

>implying orange catholicism isnt just a rip off of buddislamic thought

>they still think the old desert barbarian religions will survive the 21st century

take that back or I'll assassin war your house irl

What was that one New Age religion that talks about and follows the teaching of all of the prophets from around the world?

No. They have different core operating systems. Islam merely claims to be an Abrahamic religion, and backs their claim by cutting your throat if you disagree.

I dunno, maybe?

fuk ur kanly m8 ill fukkin burn ur stones

Maybe. Both were the result of different Imperial cultures adopting Jewish theology. It's even thought that Islam began as a syncretic movement to unite Arab Judaism, Christianity, and what can only be described as Abrahamism until debates with Iraqi Rabbis and absorption of Sassanid Zoroastrian antagonism with Byzantine Christianity set it on a different path.

If the world becomes more and more globalized then an Abrahamic faith further stripped of its Late Antiquity Roman/Persian foundations might be appealing, but at the same time both religions have existed for so long that they're now cultural forces of their own more able to resist globalism than simple regional culture.

sikhism

That's more the gap between Islam and Hinduism.

Islam has extremely strong internal safeguards against syncretism. So no.

Bahá'í Faith?

It seems more plausible to me that theists will increasingly leave abrahamic religions for deism, or pledge cultural allegiance to one or the other while truly being deist or atheist. It's kinda already happening. I can see some transhumanistic crap that bleats promises of eternal life becoming a new "religion" without people recognizing it, though, and would probably draw in a lot of supposed atheists. LessWrong is just the beginning.

I don't get it. They each claim opposing things about Jesus. So they can't be fused, because they conflict with each other.

Islam already incorporates aspects of Christianity, so not much different.

>religions can't survive if they're contradictory

wew lad

>Jehovallah is 1.5 persons
>1.0 God
>0.5 Jesus

Most religions contain paradoxes, not outright conflicting accounts of historical events.

Caodaism?

>Islam is way too fundamentalist and opposed to inter-religious dialogue to believe any syncretism, even accidental, could happen
>what is the middle east before the USA backed fundamentalist coups

Theosophy? It might be a little old to count as new age though.

Lol oh /pol/

Yes, Christians will finally drop their backward ways and join Islam.

They are the similar and are different at the same time.

All it takes is for a Jew, a Muslim, a Christian, a Brahmin, a Buddhist, to be in the same room, talk about their ideas, beliefs, God, and instead of arguing, what usually happens is they apply two concepts of their religion:

Tolerance

Understanding

When they apply tolerance, they start to understand why the other sees it differently. We are all people, and we all have justification for our beliefs and ideas.

If someone wanted to worship Satan, and didn't hurt anyone in the process, technically, they reserve the right to do so. That is how religion should be.

You can't blame a religion for a few tyrants that claim to be "religious" and then say "religion is illogical"

Why? That would be like saying "Hitler? Yes, all German people are just like him" That is false, not all German people are like Hitler. What is more illogical is blaming a religion, because a religion is not a person, it doesn't act people do. This nonsense that religion is illogical, is illogical itself. How does a religion act when it isn't a person

Retarded