More hp

Unironically a good engine, wish they didn't sound like shit though.

>drive shaft snaps in half immediately

>blows up
Yeah, with an SSI tune and disabling knock detect. Otherwise, it's an extremely strong power train. There's a guy on the EcoBoost forum who is putting up double the stock numbers, 750+ hp

It was a short course and it barely limped over the finish line. It wouldn't stand a chance in the Baja.

Good engine? You don't move 7000lbs around with a tiny engine.

Attached: 3.5L Block with Holes 013 SMALL (1).jpg (2000x1328, 1.72M)

Tfw you are a Ford fanboy, but for the Coyote and not the """"egoboost""""

Pls let this 4 and 6 cylinder hell end

>tfw bought an ecoboost instead of a coyote
Should I trade it in? I want a 4x4 long bed single cab coyote. Idk if that even exists

Idk about you, but compared to the Coyote it's much easier to make more HP out of the ecoboost with just bolt ons

>v8 cucks assmad that the ecoboost is superior

Attached: v8 cuck BTFO2.png (792x538, 413K)

I literally can’t stop sucking black dick

>this assmad

Attached: 1517751292712.jpg (470x470, 31K)

>Sucking the dick of attention no matter what

>You don't move 7000lbs around with a tiny engine.
More like; you don't move 7000lbs without enough oil

elaborate please. all off road cars i've seen were turboed

isn't it pretty much the standard for american made vehicles? your shoddy quality is second only to the chinese i think

why dont they use ecotec tech in a v8?

I'm just mad they didn't make a twin turbo V8 instead.

>implying they'd waste time with a redundant configuration

Why is twin turbo V8 redundant when a twin turbo V6 isn't?

f

Because the twin turbo V6 hits the objective measures Ford is targeting. This may come as a shock to you, but outright peak power isn't the sole objective engineers target when developing a powerplant for a specific vehicle.
Personally I think the Coyote should be discontinued anyway in all but the more budget half ton pickups. I think the Mustang GT should be an Ecoboost V6 over the V8, although then I guess the GT would suddenly white ant the GT500 sales.

Did you guys know black semen is 80% more nutritious than white semen? I love it

>have you ever been so asshurt, your beliefs are insulted but you can't refute?

Your thinking of german build cars my dude.

I've never driven one but isn't the turbo lag supposed to be really bad?

I don't people who buy Raptors car about gas mileage so I don't understand sacrificing the v8 unless it's just saving Ferd money.

S/o/viet here I have been pretending to be white on Veeky Forums for years but I have to come clean
Pic is what I really look like

Attached: 12FFA243-1B2C-4B00-B9E8-733E18732170.png (640x1136, 155K)

>raining outside
>misfires at 1/4 throttle

the ram power wagon is literally a better precummer

>Pic is what I really look like
Everyone knows you're american.

Attached: the guy who calls you a soyboy.jpg (1200x1200, 185K)

Why's that?

holy shit LOL
but why

>makes that power because of forced induction

And if Ford offered a TT 5.0, the EcoBoost would be irrelevant.

>and if Ford offered
Read

>but muh 2.7L isn't a total fucking joke of an engine
>But muh 3.5 Ecoboootht isn't cuckery via EPA
>See the Ferd GT that I cant' buy and no one can sell theirs to me because Ferd will sue them - it has a veesix.
>The EPA likes it, checkmate, bigot
>Omg adding 2 cylinders would ruin everything
>Why would anyone want a turbocharged V8 when they can have a 2.7L veesix in a "truck" with a factory permeable bed?

Attached: 1520186686994.jpg (720x736, 32K)

Yeah but why have reliability and simplicity in a truck when you can have
>Muh 0-60 timez
>Muh honda fartcan exhaust, factory

sperg more

Attached: v8 BTFO.png (831x562, 54K)

but I am actually white, have posted my skin, lurk moar

also

>posting /pol/shit outside /pol/
reported

>implying I am an americuck

>not having a barra I6

Attached: 1512734716329.png (1000x709, 712K)

Instead it has a better engine.

Thoroughly enjoying the amount of unwarranted V6 hate in this thread

The V6 sounds like dogshit. The 4.0L V6 in my 2004 Ranger sounds better.

Turbo lag is almost non existent with the tiny Turbonis they have on them

Out of curiosity how often do vehicles reach such high mileage without being basically rolling relics on the streets?

>18836109
>100k miles
>high mileage

go buy a prius nignog you so concerned about gas mileage, v8 is the way to go in a truck fagglet

>lesser power and torque is the way to go in a truck
Makes sense
>running costs aren't relevant to small business owners
How to pick a basement dwelling LARPer 101

Pretty fucking often. I'm looking for a specific car from 2013 and I can't find one with less than 100k.

>do tests where there's 17% less oxygen than the normal environment most people live in
>forced induction works better than naturally aspirated

NO FUCKING SHIT. They sweep it under the rug with a dismissive comment, but it's the entire goddamn difference in this scenario. They're crippling the NA engine with the environmental conditions while the turbo engine barely notices a difference, because it's got a turbo blowing EXTRA AIR.

>the option that works in a wider range of conditions shouldn't be rewarded

>pre running a stock truck
Go ahead do it

Your seeing cars most likely in rally run them which would be fine where everything is remotely flat and torque isn't the biggest issue the problem comes when you off-road in a truck and are trying to get over, threw or out of stuff and you need that instant low end torque and can't wait for a turbo to spoil to get all your power
Plus the idea of having to spin the hell out of that turbo and have it possibly fail when all you were doing is showing Cletus you could climb that rock

I don't think you have any idea how turbos or torque converters work.

>tell him to sperg more
>spergs more

Attached: 1499165464156152348.jpg (300x300, 24K)

Like pottery

>running costs
do you have exact numbers? how long term are you talking about? did you include parts? let's see the results of your investigation

But what if turbo 8?

>can you provide broad generalised evidence of circumstantial outcomes?
I can't, but perhaps you can if you're suggesting it's possible. Until then we only have fuel economy and servicing costs to go by.
Read

Isn't the Raptor already top tier though? Its not hacking sales from another model

It is, but top tier doesn't mean "shoot for the moon"... Unless it's dodge Hellcat of sorts.

Raptor is already far above the closest competitor in its rather exclusive segment, they might as well Dodge Demon

>airbags deploy
jej

That's more evident they don't need to. I'd leave it to Saleen or a Shelby badged special if you wanted to see a modern force fed V8 F150.

Then why is Ford going back to a V8 in the next Raptor iteration?

B T F O
T
F
O