Why is pederasty not socially acceptable anymore?

Are children mentally developed enough to make decisions like those on their own? When you were 10 and 40 year old offered to buy you a toy if you let him fuck you, would have understood that?

Buttsex was explicitly and strictly not allowed for free bois, slaves on the other hand you weren't expected to take into consideration that sort of shit

Are you ageist or what? If children are mentally developed enough to solve math equastions and kill other people, than they are ready for sex.

This is some retarded pedo reasoning right here.

>math is on par with murder and sex

That aside any person with control over their limbs can kill. Understanding consequences is a higher mental function that requires real world context

Kids wouldn't be traumatized if they weren't conditioned to be

Who cares if they understand, they may learn their butt was used at some point, but in the end were all animals anyway so who gives a fuck, and neither should they. Sex is just molecules against molecules, cells on cells. And they recover quickly.

Who gives a shit what they think?

> Understanding consequences
What are the consequances here? That can't be explained but somehow perfectly understood by the same boy in the age of 18?

Guys, no one here is an actual pedo, r-right? We're all just roleplaying, r-right?

Heh

The crux of what im saying is this. Imagine the boy is not "they", the boy is you. Would you have understood the transaction well enough at the age of 10 to give consent?

No.

yes

maybe

As a proud virgin, I wouldn't understood it even in the age of 40.

No but who gives a hoot, both sides got what they want.

It is in Afghanistan

Would it be okay if the parents are alright with it? Since they pretty much own you until you turn 18.

Because the ramifications and realities of these relations became widely known, and so public revulsion made them unacceptable in western society.

Would you, as the child, be alright if your parents were?

>public revulsion
>public
I think you mean religious men and feminists

And of those religious men, only of a certain dogma.

No, but they wouldn't care anyway.

>Mfw i'll never be a Germanic warrior raiding Roman territory
>mfw i'll never find a roman cuteboy/femboy with a tight pink boipussy to rape

The Germanics were actually hetero though.

Ancient Germanics would throw homesexuals in bogs, Google it

Then again if he was a Roman...

>Implying they wouldnt have showed dominance through raping young roman traps infront of the Roman men

>I had the horn for older women since I was like 8
>Some males are gays
---------------------
Some boys would defo want the old dude's dick, QED, KYS.

Because there's no need for it in modern society?

Vitriolic hatred of pedophiles is very mainstream

youtube.com/watch?v=caPZ_1FpGxw

What was the need for it in ancient times???

>Are children mentally developed enough to make decisions like those on their own?

Definitly
I remember when I was 10 fantasized on adult women a lot and if a hot one had offered me sex I could easily have consented
Now for the topic of older men, it fully depends whether the boy is a homo or not

If I'm not mistaken it was done as a rite of passage in entering puberty in Ancient Greece

amazon.com/Paul-Among-People-Reinterpreted-Reimagined-ebook/dp/B0036S0F62?ie=UTF8&btkr=1&redirect=true&ref_=dp-kindle-redirect

>The astonishingly high quality of the new literature concerned with the greatest missionary apostle continues in poet and classical translator Ruden’s cross-referencing of Paul and his literary confreres who describe the world in which Paul spread and strengthened the new faith in Christ. Her project enables her to call the standard repertoire of Pauline characterizations seriously into question. Paul’s cross-references show us a Greek and Roman world of great brutality, given to pleasures carried to damaging and even fatal extremes. Nor was there any notion of inhumane punishment; hence, crucifixion, to which only commoners and slaves were subjected. Homosexuality was basically anal rape of adolescent boys, the more painful the better for the socially superior rapists. Women of high status were veiled, while unveiled women were treated as prostitutes and criminals. Slaves were so unequal to masters that they might have been a different, inferior species. The nonviolent love and community that Christianity preached radically differed from such exploitative, status-based norms, and Paul’s preaching, perceived as being against homosexuality and higher status for non-ruling-class women and slaves, looks very different when contrasted with those Greco-Roman norms as reported by writers from Aristophanes to Apuleius. Judiciously citing her own behavior to bring certain points home to contemporary readers, Ruden is winningly intimate as well as impressively scholarly in this superb book.

Because people are retarded and their morals are wack, in more ways then 1

Again no buttsex was allowed between the eromenos and erastes and it was mostly a formative relationship with some petting and bjs on the side, and also in roman times penetrating a free born child was frowned upon, really classic pederasty can't work anymore because slavery and enforced class systems aren't a thing anymore and your child having a romantic relation with his mentor doesn't make any sense to the modern mind

user, you're so lewd! But y-yes...

Not a pedo but when I was a kid I offered myself to men in their 20s/30s and it felt fucking good. Traumatising experience my ass the only thing I regret is not trying to offer myself to a MILF and see what happens.

Don't be fags guys, lolis is where it is at.

Depends how old, if it was a pretty 20-30 yo guy i would gladly accept it.

I lusted for both men and women when i was a boy, some of my first faps were on men.

Oh God, please tell more.

Agreed, more

I probably would have liked it but a woman would have been even better. I was such a horny fucker back then.

The elites all engage in child-fucking but intentionally keep it taboo so that they have a way to quickly and effortlessly ruin the lives of lesser elites if they step out of line. See: Jared the Subway guy.

He had child porn tho, wasn't fucking kids as far as we know

As in adult sex, it's all about the consent. People don't suddenly become more apt to make decisions when they turn 18. Consentual sex with 14+ should be legal. Consentual, non-harmful sex with younger people should be a minor offense. Actual rape should still be severily punished though.

The Christian clergy laid a monopoly on it, still fair game on Afghanistan though.

Consent =/= competence

>implying papists are Christians

Because feminists hate the sex market they're losing to

What you think is going on behind closed doors man?

>thinking anything has changed

Hi FBI

POST THE FUCKING STORY DAMMIT

retards are allowed to marry aren't they?

Wow, what a spicy meme. All the feminists I know are ultra degenerate sex worker enabling, pedophile apologists.

shit meant to quote

It was actually more common for the Romans to do the raping. In fact, this was one of the reasons that started the Batavian revolt.

Because it's sick and disgusting. Go fuck a sheep instead you broken fucks.

This. I have a lot of furry porn so i dont mind bestiality. But pedophilia is the most evil thing imaginable. It boggles the mind

>evil
meme

>horsefucker calling anyone evil

lmaoing

>evil

Spooked.

It's literally the most patrician fetish.

Actually, its still okay as long as you're rich.

Just look at the Clinton Foundation and British Parliament pedo rings.

why isn't a romantic relationship with a young girl socially acceptable anymore?
It was thigh sex, wasn't it?

>it should be all about consent
Top ideology.

>letting people harm themselves out of ignorance is top ideology

Yes it is.

>Would you have understood the transaction well enough at the age of 10 to give consent?
yes because everybody does it in the open and it is explained. it is like going to school of the ''secular humanists'' today and being prepared for it. what you are asking is ''would you understand what happens once your parents drop you to school for the first time?''

At 13, absolutely. I was an uber-gay kid.

Fuck off moralfags, age of consents are completely arbitrary

People are free to choose their sexual partners no matter what

This desu. I was not exposed to straight porn early on, so I was more comfortable with exploring male sexuality.

ITP: fags

Boy fucker gets triggered when his depraved mind is mocked.

Story teim?

The whoring part maybe not, but opportunity to get railed by some hot stud? Yes, definitely yes.

>Would you have wanted some old dude to ram you in the ass when you were 10?

The boy wants a cock in his ass?

You're all REPROBATE SODOMITESyou're all goin to HELL

God hATES YOU
the BIBLE SAYS STONE fags

And yes, you have to obey it because John 1 says the KING JAMES BIBLE IS GOD!

Chaos resonance.

>hatred

>Who cares if they understand
gays need to be culled

Let me comment on this. Degeneracy that we have today is a product of our societys relation to sex. Sex is seen as a private act and something to be kept behind closed doors. It's not to be displayed in public, it's to be performed only in secrecy. Sex in public is a disgrace and a taboo and even a crime. This is our creed in regards to sex. That considered you may see the Pride parade for example as a reaction to this environment. Sex is taken out and paraded in public to rebel against the norm, this is seen as a revolutionary act.

Humans have not only a desire but a need for sexual relations obviously. So we may shun its public display but the need is still there. Consider porn sites, they are among the top most visited websites in the world, up there with facebook, twitter and youtube. People are consuming porn on a gigantic scale but only privately of course. This is our degeneracy. This is how our societys relation to sex has degenerated from a previous "high point", where sexuality was not demonized and made taboo in this way. The modern sexual practices and deviancies that we see, are simply reactions to this relation with sex that we have.

So consider the greeks, who did not have such taboos and laws about what to do and what not to do. They could fuck freely, boy or girl, young or old, and thus had no need for pride parades or furry conventions.

>This is how our societys relation to sex has degenerated from a previous "high point", where sexuality was not demonized and made taboo in this way.
and what society is that

ancient greece is one such high point. I'd say, christian dogma has probably led us to our current situation in regards to sex.

>greeks fucked each other out in the open
think you might be getting all your history from clay pots there
you wouldn't catch anyone fucking little boys in the streets of Athens
where's the proofs?

Well now, you misqouted me. If greeks fucked each other out in the open on the streets, i don't know. But they had a way more open mind to sex in general as evidenced by their approval of same-gender sexual relations and with youngsters.

You see the greeks didn't have porn. And they didn't have a need for porn. But they still had a need for sex, or a sexual outlet, and they achieved this in the natural and logical way. The natural and logical way is kind of highly illegal in todays world, which explains sexual deviancies, reduction in fertility and porn.

>you wouldn't catch anyone fucking little boys in the streets of Athens
You would, and totally still can. Why do you think greeks cant pay denbts? It's because they are to busy boy-fucking to do any work.

>Well now, you misqouted me.
>It's not to be displayed in public, it's to be performed only in secrecy. Sex in public is a disgrace and a taboo and even a crime. This is our creed in regards to sex.
no I think I paraphrased quite well

>The natural and logical way is kind of highly illegal in todays world, which explains sexual deviancies, reduction in fertility and porn.
no, availability explains porn
little boy pussy isn't easily available, if it were legal to fuck them it'd still take a good deal of cajoling or money if they were prostituting themselves (boipucci wouldn't be cheap)
people (fags) would just wank to boys getting fucked online more if it was legal, the same way people wank today instead of just going out and getting a whore

on one hand i want Veeky Forums to turn into /pol/ 2.0 but on the other i'm proud Veeky Forums accepts boy buggery

Your arguments are so full of holes. How does availability explain porn? Availability of what?

Boy pussy is all around you, more people alive today then ever in history. If it were legal to fuck boys you could enter into a normal relationship, you wouldn't have to buy a prostitute (just like people do all the time with Tinder).

People wank (to porn) today instead of getting a prostitute, because it's free and prostitutes aren't.