Why didn't Christians just unified under one Church?

Why didn't Christians just unified under one Church?

because to them minor doctrinal differences are a perfectly good reason for God to send someone to hell.

Because Christians aren't immune to petty bickering and power struggles.

Because those fucking heretics kept refusing to accept the pope's authority

It's called the post southern strategy Republican party

>Why didn't Christians just unified under one Church?
Political reasons like the Patriarch of Rome controlling the entire West and Greek Christianity and the Byzantine emperors being too much entangled
There are also the obvious non-uniformity of doctrine and beliefs of the early Christian faith

You mean accept antichrist authority? Nah thanks m8

>catholics came after lutherans

um what

Constantine please go

It is literally in the Bible m8

Because instead of studying the bible and living by it they study the bible to justify their own ideology of what they think life is. That a why there's like 30,000 sects of Christianity. Its a meme.

autism

They did, though the accurate dating is 1545

we are trying.
Everyone in pic related has pretty much been signing declarations of "we believe literally the same thing and are taking steps towards restoring communion"(last one was the catholic-orthodox agreement from 2 months ago) with everyone else in the pic for the past decades.

>Paganshits with not a single text to their religion managed to be unified in diversity since they main stories are ingrained in folk tradition.

>Christcucks with the fucking written word can't unite for shit.

>implying having the same main traditions and theology from Ireland to Ethiopia and India, despite living almost totally separated from each other, isn't way more impressive than the resulting contradictory clusterfuck of mythology in any given syncretic pagan religion.

>no protestant churches listed
Really makes you think.

desu, the original protestants are derived from the RCC, and they still use the Church Fathers, Holy Tradition, the Eucharist, etc. And those are in the process of reaching agreement on theology with their Mother See as well(see the 1999 agreement with lutherans, or the documents the anglicans are writing recently).
So yeah, everyone who gives a shit about history is on the same page.

Every person is a temple, so like, everyone working together is a church. All denominations are different perspectives of the same thing, even outside of religion, everyone is a soul.

>muh special snowflakes
One of them has to be the definitive interpretation, otherwise the whole thing tanks.

But what is a definition compared to an experience.

Not doubting but where.

Because some people think worshipping God "on their own terms" makes more sense than having a consistent logic for it, let alone a consistent organisation.

>implying Catholicism came about in 1559
>implying Catholicism came about AFTER Lutheranism

Shit tier graphic desu.

I think it's saying Presbyterianism came in 1559 and Catholicism is bent in the side to make room for all the heresy.

Small question, what does Veeky Forums think of Episcopalians?

...

why doesn't the world just unite under one government?

Pretty much all of Matt. 24, a good chunk of Revelation and so on

It will, Revelation 13.

Because of the reasons that they split up.

Because monotheism is an intrinsically impossible ideal. A single unified church will never happen, since we're talking about groups of people that can agree and disagree with each other.

This means that any group of people will always fluctuate between unity and disunity, and that trying to get unity by force will merely strengthen the fracturing of these groups of people