How many of you guys are C L A S S C O N S C I O U S?

How many of you guys are C L A S S C O N S C I O U S?

so what

Boy I sure do hate leftists

>Implying Veeky Forums isn't contrarian and as long as the mainstream is in bed with the left we won't be against it no matter how many retards raid this

This. Back when gay marriage was illegal and unpopular Veeky Forums was begging for it.

how fucking retarded are these kids
not only having a pseudo-intellectual discourse over how to "colonize" the autism epicenter of the internet, it takes severe brain damage to non-ironically type out

>But yes, memes are the way forward.

Do these guys inject communism in their blood or snort them.

Why was the previous post about it deleted? Are the mods against us? We must be warned about a fucking invasion!

Funny how a planned Reddit raid is starting to feel like a pol raid.

They saw how /pol/ was with Trump memes and unironically think by posting frogs in berets they can make everyone communist.

Delusional, elitest, and out of touch.

>Funny how a planned Reddit raid is starting to feel like a pol raid.
>/pol/
>knowing our existence
we are an abandoned colony just like african countries

Veeky Forums is the Rhodesia of /pol/.

It was founded by and for /pol/, colonised by them, they built good threads ane lively discussion and generally improved the site as a whole. Then Veeky Forumsddit came and started an insurgency here. /pol/ got bored with this place and left and now the few /pol/ settlers who built this place are now fiercely defending our way of life from daily "who was better, marx or engels?" threads. It can't last forever, as we all know, one day the kid commies will become too numerous and take over this place, but for now it's white and based.

This is literally the best explication of Veeky Forums that i've seen

I've been on here from day one.

It has literally always been a /pol/ vs. Veeky Forums shitflinging session.

I've been two months here and yes, it's a constantly civil war between /pol/ and Veeky Forums

We all know that's the reality, lads, but we have to romantacize it. I'm sure the communists would say Veeky Forums is the Albania of the cold war.

>n-word

I've literally never seen an invader to /poil/ "out-argue" /pol/

people go there thinking they can't back up their shit but they almost always can and they can make you look stupid if you're not prepared. Even if they're wrong they can argue effectively enough to win an argument

We all know Trump is a closet Marxist. I mean, no other candidate has been able to rally the poor, uneducated, working class Americans like him. No wonder the bourgeois elite wanted him to lose.

>I've literally never seen an invader to /poil/ "out-argue" /pol/
Probably because you're biased in /pol/'s favour. Only a retard who believes infographics and rambling youtube videos are credible sources would ever buy /pol/'s shit. Normal non-autistic people see their folders of """evidence""" and realize what they are: gish gallops meant to avoid a real debate by flooding the opponent with so much bullshit they can't possibly refute it all so they just give up.

If anything, Veeky Forums is more Old Right than Alt-Right. God knows I've encountered my fair share of monarchists on here, and we have some frighteningly conservative religious types here as well.

>out-argue /pol/
Anyone who tries to do this is retarded. It's way more fun to shitpost until you trigger them into rage and collect (You)s that include beloved buzzwords like
>cuck
>jew
>roastie
>ctr
>shill
>nu-male
>mudslimes
>nigger
>degenerate
If you're lucky and get all those terms in one reply, you win bingo.

Lel I remember when Veeky Forums was first opened /pol/fags' were posting "redpilling" threads left and right that were immediately deleted.

Then I check /pol/'s catalogue and saw a bunch of threads complaining about Veeky Forums being "Jewish" and "cucked".

You know many of those info graphs have sources right?

More like the Communist from Reddit turns up says a few things calls /pol/ racist Nazis ignores half the points then fucks off

More like the exact opposite has been happening from the day this board opened.

>roastie

Hey retard that's our word.

t. /r9k/

>gish gallops
OK fuck off redditor

/pol/, even when it's wrong, is pointless to ague with, that's my point.

He's no Marxist, but he has some socialist flavor. Also nationalism obviously. Basically national socialism.

That's because you can never get /pol/ to acknowledge losing an argument. What they use aren't actually proper argumentation but rather propaganda tactics designed to be compelling to anons lurking rather than the person they're actually arguing with.

Is this the third time you've posted this today?

seriously tho, we've all read at least a little marx and don't think the frankfurt school started a global conspiracy to end western civilization, right?

This. I bet those fags don't even remember our original sticky.

FUCKIN' NAZIS AND THEIR REVISIONISM AMRITE?

Marx started the thought the Frankfurt school made it a reality with slow injections of it into Collages all over the West. There may not be some le evil 100% of Jews conspiracy but their actions are causing Marxism to flourish in colleges and the younger populations and in turn is destroying the foundation of the Western world right down to the family level.

ah, thank you for clarifying that

Of course. He was right in the rich exploiting the poor. What he doesn't touch upon is how much of that is just basic human nature, and you can't just erect a government in opposition of that and expect it to work. That's why he never explained precisely HOW to build a socialist govt

not a single sjw gives a fuck about overthrowing capitalism in the Orthodox Marxist sense they just want the board of directors to be tranny PoCs

associating them with Marxism isn't fair

Why are right wingers so easily triggered and conspiratorial?

You can't say nigger on reddit without getting banned.

Cross-pollination between ourselves and r/socialism would improve both communities

Yeah, /pol/ is the exact demon they accuse everyone else of being.

t. /r/socialism user

This x 30,000

/pol/ tries to rationalize this with some rambling about how "Marxism is about race these days"

If a bunch of redditors went to /pol/ to try to convert them, they'd just end up agreeing with /pol/ by the end.

God, don't remind me of Constantine. I'm so glad I collected that retards posts and mocked him on Reddit, forcing him to stop tripcoding.

Jesus, how cringy

Most SJW call this sort of socialism "brocialism" and claim it is oppressive.

>I got brainwashed by two bit propaganda and so will they

that's it lad, critical engagement with texts/ideas. what shits me is the meme swallowing fucks who just spout these retarded one liners they got from a jpeg while never having read a sentence of it themselves.

did he turn out to be a chick or was that bullshit?

All the Veeky Forums shit is Veeky Forums to begin with. But when /pol/ does it, it is okay but when reddit does, that is bad :^)

I thought "brocialism" was the term the colored lefties used to insult the white people who are tired of hearing about privilege and pronouns and actually want to do something about jobs and wages and manufacturing.

It's so hilarious how they turn on each other. The left isn't going to get a fucking thing done with Trump in charge because they'll be too busy excommunicating each other.

I liked Constantine. I also like our small bevy of turkposters.

Pig disgusting.

>being a right-winger

Not whatsoever. People who complain about brocialism just believe socialists should also work to stop racism and other forms of oppression.

>what is new right vs alt right vs neo-cons

Nah, anybody who uses the term brocialism is still anticapitalist

The great virtue of the American Right is, ironically, that they're a bunch of fucking lemmings. When push comes to shove they'll all fall in line behind the party, that's why Trump won. The American Left, by contrast, loves nothing more than faction.

However many young people especially those who attend collages are introduced to Marxist thought made popular by the Frankfurt school.

Feminists and many young collage graduates agree with Gay Marriage are anti religious, pro gay and transsexual rights, are against the Patriarchy which a couple of decades ago was very much a thing which although these are not explicitly Marxist definitely help the Marxist cause.

Another thing is that many of these feminist women would be for taxing the upper class more for increased single mother welfare the enforcement of companies to hire x amount of women and x amount of minorities an increase in how easy it is easily divorce and a thousand other things. All of which are against the traditional background of Western civilization

Probably more to do with the left sitting the election out. 47% didn't vote iirc

Also the right civil war is probably gonna begin now that trump denounced the alt right

Fuck you and fuck the turkposter tripfag
Fucking obnoxious dickhead with nothing significant to ever contribute, just inane turkish rambling and shit-stirring

Anticapitalist is the correct stance.

>all that confederate butthurt

>All of which are against the traditional background of Western civilization

... isn't eastern and african civilization FAR more patriarchal on average than even pre-20th century western civilization?

... I don't know what you're trying to say with this, but as the person who wrote that post and a whiter southerner I'm mildly offended.

I've read a little Marx and it totally convinced me that the Frankfurt School started a global conspiracy to end Western Civilization desu.

Good thing I'm an ego-anarchist ayy lmao

Constantine was a bit preachy but there was literally nothing wrong with him.

Constantine refused to consider evidence that anything his church said about history could be mistaken, and misconstrued philosophers who disagreed with Christianity

Nobody ever fucking votes in America. They sure do love to bitch about their politicians, though. Maybe the original format of the US government really was the superior one, with its heavy restrictions on the power of the actual voters.

> C L A S S C O N S C I O U S?

I am! that's why I am so strongly against these peoples efforts.

Humanities was a mistake. It's turning into a battleground for both communists and stormfags who just use history to push their agenda and try and associate everything bad with whatever ideology that doesn't work for them.

Is there any hope for Veeky Forums when you have people are retarded as ?

He would literally refuse to accept any other viewpoint or even consider them. He spent fucking days arguing that Nietzsche ripped everything off of Dostoevsky, which is just an absurd proposition.

I will admit I'm not too good on Eastern and African civilizations and what position of power women had. I'm aware of a few cherry picked African matriarchal tribes but that's where my knowledge on the topic gets thin

However I'm going to assume that's correct even pre 20th century Western Civilization. Was going pretty good for women they could be educated own and run estates divorce under certain circumstances.

However these sort of Women's rights were not anti-capitalist or pro the workers seizing the means of productions at that time. They were still "loyal" to their husbands kept in the dark for most matters on ruling the country would of probably been religions and laughed at Marxism they would of been for the current Monarch and his nobles and the current state of the political system. Very different then modern Feminism which is in a sense anti-family thereby decreasing European birth rates. Stable families with stable incomes have more kids unstable families where divorces are common both parents work have less children

*tips fedora*

Link?

Most negative election in decades. I can understand the huge decrease in voter turnout.

Nah, first past the post election sucks. Also primaries are terrible

Why would you blame the shitshow that is the American political system on the voters?

>gish gallops meant to avoid a real debate by flooding the opponent with so much bullshit they can't possibly refute it all so they just give up.

This. It's a pretty common tactic to shut someone up. Rather than actually making an argument you bury them in so much crap they can't actually argue against all of it, declaring victory when they don't go chasing after dozens of sources in the context of a debate lasting maybe a few hours. You force them to either admit defeat by not addressing the sources, or leave the discussion to address the sources and hand it over by default.

This is also known as policy or cx debate

WHO HERE EX /HIGHSCHOOLDEBATE/

>This is also known as policy or cx debate

I didn't know there was a name for it. It's just a tactic I've seen used on both /pol/ and Veeky Forums (the anti-evolution guy and that one Catholic that would start REEEing any time you criticize the shroud of Turin's authenticy both used it). It's pretty effective at shutting up the opposition in a debate, though it's shitty dialectic.

>WHO HERE EX /HIGHSCHOOLDEBATE/

I wish. I came from some shit-hole in nowhere.

google those debates

include the term "spreading" or "spewing"

This is what the adherents labelled progressive debate.

Have Communists always been this retarded? No wonder it "never worked."

>However these sort of Women's rights were not anti-capitalist or pro the workers seizing the means of productions at that time. They were still "loyal" to their husbands kept in the dark for most matters on ruling the country would of probably been religions and laughed at Marxism they would of been for the current Monarch and his nobles and the current state of the political system. Very different then modern Feminism which is in a sense anti-family thereby decreasing European birth rates. Stable families with stable incomes have more kids unstable families where divorces are common both parents work have less children


This doesn't seem to be 'attacking the fabric of western civilization' so much a 'attacking white birth rates'.

Even then, that's a tangential effect of a non-mature system. Before the refugee crisis (and I'd bet even now, but studies confirming that will be hard to find) there was a lt of evidence that the state was replacing the family as a social support mechanism. I would bet money that once social welfare becomes thoroughly entrenched for a generation or so and young women realize they can have children with multiple men without the need to work or find a provider, you'd see European birth rates pop back up. Teenage and twenty-something women I encounter in my daily life tend to still /want/ kids, they just don't want to ruin their lives by having them. Assuming the welfare state survives the massive strain it's receiving from immigrants, they won't have to soon.

The family is not particularly integral to 'western civilization', it's only important to white birth rates. Moreover, that importance is likely transient in the presence of large social programs.

> there was a lt of evidence that the state was replacing the family as a social support mechanism.

Apologies. Evidence it was replacing the family.... in Scandinavia.

Obviously

Outside of Veeky Forums and leddit the alt-right is largely a meme. They have no real political influence, despite taking credit for the whole Trump phenomenon.

How are any of those policies anti-Western?

Egalitarianism, many would argue, is an important Western value.

Good job!

If you keep it up, Mr. Shekelstein might let you watch next time he fucks your wife.

>Have Communists always been this retarded?

Basically, yes.

Progressives hate policy debate because it inadvertently favors rich and often white kids by demanding a huge time commitment and luxurious university resources.

So a cuck joke and an anti-Semitic comment.

are you a socialist or an alt-right kid?

>When push comes to shove they'll all fall in line behind the party
that applies to both sides of the political spectrum if we're being honest. When you're in opposition you have a chance to have ideological knife fights without any negative repercussions on your reelection chances, since your average voter gives a flying fuck about that shit in non presidential years. Once you're in power on the other hand partisan instinct kicks in and you will defend almost anything that's introduced as the party line.

lol the republican party tried as hard as they could to stop Trump, the democrats should have done the same to clinton, regardless of whether it was her turn or not

Bad redditor. Once your being has been tainted with their reddoric, you can never come back

Yeah, good thing we don't have two threads about Holocaust denial right now.

Loads of other websites and boards seem to think Veeky Forums is their battleground, and they're constantly trying to get control of it.
Adding humanities was a mistake as it allowed this to happen, it would still be there to an extent if it was just history, but it would be much much harder for people to push their dumb beliefs as they'd have to mask it under shitty history, which people actually into history would call out.

We need to purge humanities.

>anyone who disagrees with liberals is a racist white nationalist nazi fascist
The vast bulk of racism on Veeky Forums is motivated by how antsy it gets people, if you really wanted to fight racism you could start by not getting into hysterics over it to the point it pollutes nearly every discussion.

>new right
Hi PJW

>neocons
Utterly dead

Someone needs to make that frase into a banner.

Up the bum

They're a bunch if pampered first world white middle-class fuck ups, so if they think they can switch me from classical liberal to "le evin reddit gommunism" they're as delusional as /adv/ people who think camwhores are decent people.