Happy birthday to this legend!!

Ah yes, true saviour of Chile.

>CIA asset
>corrupt
>Chile only started growing after he was deposed
What a hero. Embezzling money is okay if you put rats in women vaginas and you follow the economic doctrine of a Jew that doesn't work, just like Marxism.

>pinochet killed enough communists to have that much effect on GDP
very impressive

>>Chile only started growing after he was deposed
>Things somehow take time to take effect

He's also been dead for much longer

What things? His policies FAILED. Government that came after were social democrats.
Also, are you naive enough to think all people he killed were militant communists?
Pinochet was literally all that most of /pol/ stands against yet in a fit of cognitive dissonance he becomes some sort of hero because he deposed a commie and then started shit that's as bad as communism.

No they didn't lol, the social democrats did nothing to spurn that growth

...

GDP per capita increased 40%

>Pinochet was literally all that most of /pol/ stands against yet in a fit of cognitive dissonance he becomes some sort of hero because he deposed a commie and then started shit that's as bad as communism.

/pol/ users are pretty stupid so I don't know why you would expect anything else from them.

>Pinochet was literally all that most of /pol/ stands against
And these things are?

Give me a source for those numbers, also he has a 70% approval rating, he is loved by his population news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6170117.stm

...

He literally started the neocon/neolib economic wave of Jewish economics that have destroyed Europe

¡Adios, my general, adiooooos!

That was tempered by a political culture that emphasized descentralization of political power and the strenghtening of civil society.

The problem with the modern West is that you have economic liberalism and a rise in social atomism. Without intermediary institutions between the individual and the state, the market ends up establishing a tyranny as great as of the state.

>loved by his population

Kek

Im Chilean and most people hate this guy or are indifferent.

I fail to see why people here love him so much. He was pretty terrible.

I'm sure Chilean people nowadays "hate" Pinochet just like Americans "hate" Hitler, for no other reason than that left-dominated media and schools told them to, and constantly reinforce it. I mean, why would you actually, literally "hate" a historical figure that has had no influence in you, and in the case of Chile, was a net positive?

Oh no all the brown people!

F

La Pintana detected.

If you want to kill your enemies, at least do it in style

>m-m-muh leftist media conspiracy
Why would you not dislike a sociopath that tortured people?

I don't know maybe because he saved Chile from becoming a Venezuela and Cuba tier socialist shithole?

Even if your speculation was correct (and ignoring that the people should be free to democratically decide how society organizes itself even if you don't like the outcome), it wouldn't stop me from disliking a sociopath, ideology aside.

>american backed kleptocrat that tortured and killed thousands, stagnated his country and turned entire assets of the country open buffet for Americans
>his country is doing better than countries America actively tried to destroy because of social democrats that came after him that America left alone

Don't forget their state owned copper mine.

Then why do you like Fidel Castro?

I don't.
Did fidel torture people though?

In rightwinger media

Yeah, its clearly the leftist media's fault, why else would people dislike guys who committed genocide, destroyed europe and tortured and killed people. People are so stupid.

Did they shoot them first before throwing out off the helicopter?

At least you can talk

Serious question, do you hate Alexander the Great? What about Cesar and Napoleon? When you're at starbucks, tipping in your macbook with your libshit friends, do you go out of your way to say how much you hate Genghis Khan? Because it's literally the same thing. But you don't because that doesn't give you virtue points right?

I don't think you know what genocide means. Conquerors in war are different from domestic tyrants desu

>bad history, imaginary scenarios, and buzzwords
Nice post, /pol/.

No apparently you don't know what genocide is.

Going to war against a particular race isn't genocide

le /pol/ boogeyman. Next time write in your fb that you're literally crying over the victims of Nebuchadnezzar II.

>more imaginary scenarios
Can you tell me more about myself user? I'm surprised you didn't resort to quoting imaginary arguments yet.

According to the UN genocide

...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily harm, or harm to mental health, to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Unless you're going by your own special definition.

All those people were more successful than Hitler and Pinochet and their policies would be found more agreable by us.

I can tell you're a libshit numale.

notice something about the guys you mentioned?

yeah like the fact that they died at least 200 years ago

this is why the 25 year rule exists

And? None of the people you labelled didn't do it to their own countrymen, only to their enemies

No. All those people don't get you virtue points by whining on fb.

Yeah, people hate guys who committed crimes less than 100 years ago and whose victims and their families are still alive. Alexander, Cesar and Napo did the same things but we look at them in a non passionate way because so many years have passed. Same thing will happen to Hitler and Pinocho in the future, but today, its totally comprehensible why people dont like them.

So you are going by your own special definition of genocide. Enjoy talking to yourself.

...

As in if you are trying to equate war mongers as genocide criminals then literally any war leader is committing genocide. War crimes aren't genocide

...

>claims others are talking to themselves
>repeats talking points like a machine

Wrong.

Alexander started a war against a faction that had attacked his own in the past. He was then charmed by the cultures he met along the way, and the people who were conquered by him left us positive accounts of his character. His empire was one of the greatest, he was undefeated in battle, and cultural exchange flourished under him.

Napoleon pushed for liberalism and nation-statehood, two things that are the backbone of the current western zeitgeist.

Caesar was a populares that got stabbed by crooked oligarchs that controled nearly all the land, that populares such as him planned to redistribute among the impoverished masses.

They could run an electoral campaign these days and their platforms would still be found sympathethic.

Ok so let's do this.

Mao killed more Chinese citizens than any foreign power.
Pol Pot killed more Cambodian citizens than any foreign power.
Fidel Castro killed more Cuban citizens than any foreign power.

I dare you open your macbook, go into the nearest starbucks, open fb and write a post of how you hate any of these and how you're literally crying over the genocide of Cubans, etc., by these "evil" leftist dictators.

Reminder that Pinochet supporters are mentally ill
youtube.com/watch?v=I8DFQC5JPKk

You pick Mao

I HATE Fidel Castro with all my guts and all of his supporters should be killed!

Said no libshit ever.

What has that to do with my post?

Do it. And post results.

>chile and argentina, two right wing nations are considered close to first world today while the rest of spicland is africa-tier due to their socialism

POTTERY

I only use FB for work. Don't even have a profile picture.

I could complain about any of these and get nods from everyone, except maybe Castro because there are old, rural, not-very-literate communists in my country, and Castro said good things about my countrymen. They wouldn't hang out at Starbucks so I'd still get nods from everyone there.

Do you have any opinion that isn't driven by /pol/ memes? It's pretty sad.

Neither is remotely close to first world. And argentina was destroyed by right wing dictatorships.

Sure? idk about Castro since he did had a civil war

>I only use FB for work. Don't even have a profile picture.
>I could complain about any of these and get nods from everyone, except maybe Castro
Are you me? What country are you from?

>I HATE Pinochet!!1
Why user?
>He killed all those people... *cries*
Here's a list of people that killed thousands of times more people than Pinochet. Do you hate them too?
>YOU ARE LE /POL/ BOOGEYMAN!

Portugal.

Happy to finally see your imaginary quotes.
Yes, people that killed "thousands of times more" than pinochet are also bad, and nobody said the opposite in this thread. Hope you are enjoying debating with imaginary people from memes instead of the actual people in the thread.

And you? Don't leave me hanging dry.

>Hitler is single-handedly destroyed Europe and is personally responsible for every single war casualty in any side during WWII
C-Castro dindu noffin

Argentina.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_American_countries_by_Human_Development_Index#Human_Development_Index

P O T T E R Y

>According to the scholarly French work, The Black Book of Communism: 14,000 Cubans were shot by firing squad alone
>The true death toll of Cuban victims of Communism is probably closer to 102,000 if one were to include those killed in the anti-Castro resistance of the early 1960s and those who drowned at sea fleeing Castro's regime.
>The total number of refugees from Castro's dictatorship is more than a million (compared to fewer than 5,000 from Pinochet).
Castro was also a corrupt politician that lived in a private island and had sex with underage prostitutes. Source: Cuban refugees.

So?

Post on fb that you're literally crying in fetal position for Castro's victims and all his supporters are mentally ill, and post results here, otherwise you're full of it.

Chile developed within the 20 years of centre-left concertacion governments. Chile only had 4 years of right-wing government in the last 26 years.

Source:
newsweekly.com.au/article.php?id=2926

AHAHAHAHHAHA

They'll probably bring up Batista's victims.

Reminder that Castro also had concentration camps.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Cuba#History

B-but it's not cool to hate him! Prof. Schlomo said that he was a progressive leader and we need one just like him!

>AHAHAHAHHAHA
Are you twelve years old or something?
Chile and Argentina being better than shitholes like bolivia doesn't even remotely equate being close to first world. I actually live in Buenos Aires, retard. We are not near first world, we have over 30% poverty, and plenty of slums. Before the coup of 1976 we had almost no poverty nor homelessness. So you are both wrong in implying that we are close to first wold countries, and wrong in implying that the right wing resulted in development. Finally, our current government, despite being consider right-wing in argentina, would be closer to democrats in the US.

Who defended castro in this thread?
Who are you quoting?

What kind of people do you see defending Mao or fucking Pol Pot?

The point has passed over you head. Granted, it's a small target.

...

I don't understand the argument
Pinochet was a dick and so was Mao and Pol Pot.

The point is you refuting or making fun of arguments nobody made?

He doesn't care about what you say, he cares about what /pol/ memes say leftists say. He's literally debating with memes by himself.

>all right wing nations in south america have proven to be better than the left wing
>some low test decadent leftist can't accept it and have to make shit up

can't make this up

Lack of counterargument is an admission of being wrong.