Why are Anglos so good at war?

Why are Anglos so good at war?

BITUMINOUS COAL

LMAO

Much longer westernized governments, societies, and economies.

Japan lost because of the bomb
US sucked at fighting at islands

Also Japan had been industrialized what? 50 years? Society doesn't adapt that fast.

Middle eastern religion doesn't help either with western influences.

>Japan lost because of the bomb
>US sucked at fighting at islands
You definitely don't know what you are talking about

>US sucked at fighting at islands

what are you on? we pushed japs off cliffs

Battle of Wake Island
Doolittle Raid

Coral sea arguably


Although there were lots of american victories Japanese were sunk into single islands at a time and the pacific ocean is loaded with them. That's why the US resorted to island hopping.

Japan had home field and defensive positions on fucking islands and we still exterminated them

They're Jews

Are they?

I think they're better at picking their allies than at fighting.

Because they have a shitload of allies in every war they fight

Divine providence. Britain exists simply because of a series of circumstances made them defeat the invincible Spanish armada. The more Anglican history you read the more you realize that god is just on their side.

>Bush
>Rumsfeld
>anglo

>That's why the US resorted to island hopping.
As opposed to what? Walking across the ocean?

They aren't. They spent the first half of WW2 getting their faced punched in by smaller, less equipped forces that they should have been beating handily.

Exactly.

>tfw it's being invaded by Satan worshiping mud people

Because it's hard to attack their homebases.
Srsly fuck navies.

>posts pic of a war America lost

>Why are Anglos so good at war?

Superior genes.

>implying
How long did it take us to find Saddam? If we hadn't tried "nation building" and we just went in like the first Gulf War and rekt his shit and left it would have been a couple month operation.

>Tfw from England
>It will never be as good as the u.s.a
Just wish our cities were as vast and military as fucking powerful.

You had a good run, anglobro.

tbf Singapore is a case of uncharacteristically gross incompetence. A scratch force of 14,000 soldiers and some Chinese volunteers lasted longer defending nearly-indefensible Hong Kong against 52,000 Japanese for 10 days longer than Percival held Singapore against a force less than half his number.

>cherry-picking the few battles they won while ignoring the many many battles they lost and their atrocious, lopsided casualty figures

Why do we let STEM majors post here again?

Historically they would torture the familes of all the irish that served in militaries and mercenary groups abroad. They did this to get intel.

This. They're islanders. It makes them perfidious, cunning, treacherous, and able to be adventurist with very little to no consequence.

The Doolittle Raid wasn't an island battle, dickhead.

>pic unrelated

>Battle of Wake Island
What?
Skill has nothing to do with that defeat, a tiny, surrounded force being hammered incessantly will eventually lose if not relieved.

The garrison actually fought ridiculously well and inflicted disproportionate losses on the japs. a fucking 21.2 ratio of fatalities in your favor is good even when you have the advantage. When you're badly outnumbered and have a handful of obsolete fighters and coastal guns to fend off modern naval vessels with a pair of carriers it's just absurd.