Anarcha-Feminism

>Anarcha-Feminism
>Anarcha

Can anyone please explain to me how this is a thing?

Also, why is "Manarchist" or "Brocialist" an insult? If anything, they seem like the biggest compliments you can give.

Other urls found in this thread:

ropeculture.org/2015/12/28/why-the-alt-right-is-gay/
youtube.com/watch?v=rfqAkUXKT5Y
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

roasties think women are oppressed by the state but they don't realize if the state was abolished they'd all go back to being forced into the kitchen 24/7 if they're not being passed around like currencies between warring communes

roasties are seriously THAT dumb

Brocialist is an insult because it implies you're a socialist.

Brocialist is an insult for male socialists who care about trivial things like employment and workers' rights and not the REALLY IMPORTANT social issues like tranny bathrooms and taxpayer funded abortions.

just another meme for dumb people like the alt-right, alex jones and communism, not a very successful or particularly relevant one either

Really?

Kek.

>alt right
>meme

It has about as much legitimacy as "assault weapon".

Are you still pushing the cuck meme that alt right was invented by the leftie media? Alt right has existed since 2010.

>Are you still pushing the cuck meme that alt right was invented by the leftie media?
No. I'm saying that it's an umbrella term used to describe everything from teenage lolbergs and politically incorrect paleocons to white nationalists. It never had clearly defined boundaries or terms and was basically just a nebulous label of a nebulous political phenomenon. As such, it means approximately nothing.

>Alt right has existed since 2010.
I've been running in those online circles since well before that.

No, alt right means specifically pro white. People like Milo, Lauren Southern or Cernovich were never alt right, just clueless libertarians who piggybacked the movement without really knowing its true nature.

You pretty much just proved what I mean.

That's like saying communism is a meaningless terms just because there are hipster bourgeois liberal students who claim to be communists.

No, because communism actually has a comprehensive definition. The fact that people are idiots and use the term however they want does not change the fact that they're wrong - however, with an ambiguous, wishy-washy, descriptive term like "alt-right" there is no such method of validation.

SJWs don't like being labelled SJWs, alt-right don't like being alt-right, they want to be viewed as independent free thinkers when really they live in little safe space bubbles, circlejerk and use all the exact same lingo and logical fallacies

Alt right = pro white movements. That's it, the base requirement.

Where I come from, there's one dude who calls himself "manarchist", but he basically means anarchist monarchism.

We like to be labeled alt right, since that's who we are. We just don't want "cultural libertarians" and other degens to be lumped in with us.

why don't you just come out and call yourselves fascists?

I mean really who are we kidding?

Fascists are just a subset of alt right, not the entire group.

Define facism for us please

>why is "Manarchist" or "Brocialist" an insult?

Centrist/Conservative liberals are okay with identity politics, as long as you don't point out that wealth is a privilege. The sheer weight of the dissonance this fact makes them feel is enough to turn them into /pol/fags.

"Brocialist" made a huge name for itself after the 2015-2016 Democratic primary. Most liberals weren't used to Left-Critique, and responded super harshly to it. They calmed down after the DNC, but they're currently having unwoke aneurysms after Hillary lost for all the reasons Leftists were screaming about for a year.

You know what's funny, a sheer majority of /pol/acks are former liberals and people from liberal families, but the utter faggotry of the Democratic party and the outright hostility towards white people turned them into unironic nazis out of spite.

And the Democrats are still completely clueless and can only blame others. Every time someone mentions how young whites gravitate towards the right, the Democrats will blame MUH FAHKS NEWS and MUH KAY KAY KAY without realizing they caused this themselves.

>outright hostility towards white people

???

*arachno-feminism
It's a mantis kind of things

The notion you're implicitly racist just by being white and that by not buying into black identitarianism you're helping white supremacy. Middle class liberals live in an alternate reality, a pulp popculture version of the 50s where all white people are rich suburban racists and all black people still live under Jim Crow. Liberal rags engage in ad hominems towards whites, accuse people of "whitesplaining" and "being blind to their own privilege" and the black liberals are just in a perpetual FUCK WHITEY mode. The Democratic party effectively alienated white people and Trump getting elected is a result of that.

lol I thought you were going to mention something like "scapegoating white identity for political gain in the party", but you really seem to be one of those people who thinks hearing that other groups have it bad is somehow oppression.

>wealth is a privilege
And progressives say that blacks are still oppressed even if they're billionaires.

>U MAD
Great argument man, this is how you guys lose elections.

You mean MIYUNNAIRES and BIYUNNAIRES

captcha: california hamburger

Oppression is intersectional. You can be "rich/white/male/whatever" and still be oppressed.

>pro white movements
Ok, what about identitarians, various euro-separatists, eurasianists, pan-slavists, pan-nordicists, european nationalists etc. etc.?

Identitarians are alt right

They aren't pro-white though.

They are FRENCH or AUSTRIAN or GERMAN, not "white".

>Redpanels

He is completely right

The Dems this round were very insulting, Hillary made a big mistake when she called Trump supporters, not Trumps ideology, a "basket of deplorables"

>You know what's funny, a sheer majority of /pol/acks are former liberals and people from liberal families
citation needed

>but the utter faggotry of the Democratic party and the outright hostility towards white people turned them into unironic nazis out of spite.
citation needed

>Great argument man, this is how you guys lose elections.
and I thought the meme magic thing was ironic

You recognize that privilege is coming from a position of empowerment, with political/financial/social inherent advantages rather than vague notions of race and gender.

Clinton acted like she was a victim of the anti-female glass ceiling despite being from a politically influential rich white southern aristocracy.

>You recognize that privilege is coming from a position of empowerment, with political/financial/social inherent advantages rather than vague notions of race and gender.

political/financial/social advantages are often applied through race and gender.

>Clinton acted like she was a victim of the anti-female glass ceiling despite being from a politically influential rich white southern aristocracy.

I would bet money that I hate Clinton more than you do.

Brocialist implies you call yourself a socialist but really the only """"""""""socialist""""""""""" policies you support are free education and legal weed

Among you're that guy, what he/you said was stupid because you just dodged the whole point of his argument.
He said that the Dems were feverish in their minority/female victim-championing to unreasonable lengths and you just replied with "I bet you get upset if they say others have it tough"

It was dumb

You responding to the wrong guy, btw.

I don't know how that user feels, but anyone who thinks the millionaire white lady who told her surrogates not to promise civil rights leaders anything, asked BLM to "think about both sides", and spent the last few months of her campaign trying to court NeverTrump Republicans was the head of an anti-white identity campaign, they're too far gone to be reasoned with.

I'm not him. "Democrats caused Trump" is stupid too. They've governed reasonably well.

This is nonsense.

If anything of theirs "caused Trump", it's their neoliberal economic policies and Clinton being a scandal-ridden candidate running on her failed 2008 mantra of "change is for hippy losers".

The race angle isn't really new. Republicans were already pretty racist. Trump's worst tendencies are stuff Bush openly touted back in 2000-2008.

This issue is that we don't always have to interpret race differences in the light of prejudice. For example, whites have a greater degree of upward social mobility, but it's not necessarily because of oppression and privilege. It might be possible that lower percentile blacks tend to be more practical and choose vocations over professions, or take jobs that are more visible in their (poor) communities, whereas whites are more ambitious and more likely to choose to go to college and pursue a professional career. We could also interpret these differences as merely differing cultural preferences instead of systematic racism.

The issue is that many people on the left start crying "muh inequality, we live in the most racist society evar xd whites are horribul" every time a statistic like this gets discovered, browbeating the majority of Americans rather than looking for rational, policy-based solutions to the issues.

WTF! I love Brocialism now.

So why don't you just call yourselves white nationalists? Is there even any difference?

Because Fascists want nothing to do with the Alt-Right, and conversely, neither does the Alt-Right. A strong contingent of Fascists and Nazis despise the Alt-Right, and nothing lays it out in plainer English than this:
ropeculture.org/2015/12/28/why-the-alt-right-is-gay/

The Alt-Right generally refers to a loose coalition of ethno-nationalists, Pat Buchanan-style paleoconservatives, neoreactionaries and disillusioned ex-Libertarians.

Almost all of them, no matter what they are, are opposed to: globalism, elites in both parties perceived to have ruined their respective nations, radical egalitarianism, and political correctness.

Only a minor segment of the Alt-Right consists of self-identified Fascists/National Socialists, and they are often savagely disparaged as stormfags by others within the movement. There are certainly White Nationalists (and recovering WNs disillusioned with that movement) in the Alt-Right, but this is largely a predictable reaction against the anti-white and anti-male "identity politics" that have been promoted by the leading coalition of Progressives and left-wing populists from the better half of the 20th century to now. Most self-identified WNs in the Alt-Right are belatedly defending their group interests while the elites have been busily promoting their own political and economic interests under the guise of humanitarian globalization and multiculturalism. As a consequence of elite's efforts, the white working and middle class has been disenfranchised in the process even if foreign trade deals greatly favor their wealthier neighbors down the street.

To all those bickering about whether progressives are hostile to white males, I present to you one of the dankest memes from this election cycle:

youtube.com/watch?v=rfqAkUXKT5Y

>political/financial/social advantages are often applied through race and gender.
That's partially true, but it's not inherent
Poorest, most disadvantaged state in the union is West Virginia, and it's almost wholly white.
Now compare a California black man, who lives quite well, and a west Virginian white man, and tell me race is the end-all.

If only I was actually fucking...

> out of spite
> being driven by spite is unexpected on the Internet at large
> or Veeky Forums in particular

>Cuck

>governed reasonably well

top kek

>"Democrats caused Trump" is stupid too
If they had picked literally anyone but Hillary they would have steamrolled Trump.
It literally is their fault, there's no way around it.