Why is he so brilliant and influential?

>Khazar genes
Another Turkic victory

>t. college freshman who took an intro philosophy course

you're adorable when you think you're smart

back to rebbit

You don't have to be paid to think to actually think

If you believe this you are a moron

...

t. Cletus who dropped out of community college

Sorry but I have STEM degree

I'm telling you to get back to work, slacker.

Major in economics. Not that it's relevant.
>i have to make shit up because i have no arguments

nice rehashed maymay reddicuck

h-he is? I never thought so. His views on economics is on par with George Lucas's views on astrophysics. He makes nice assertions but are incomplete at best.

Explains it. STEM doesn't require you to think in a philsophical way, it requires you to be autistic with numbers.

dont let reddit fool you, he was influential for his time but ultimately 100% wrong

So you've never had sex?

>economics 101

>People with different opinions then mine must come from certain backgrounds!

>takes a philosophy course
>thinks he can actually think philosophically now

you're the only autist here user

>brilliant

Agreed. The best stuff came after him and turned it all on it's head.

No I have, stop by your mother's house and you can watch us

Here's some intro to Marx, for those who never read him.

Communist Manifesto:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/

Value, Price, and Profit:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1865/value-price-profit/index.htm

Capital:Chapter I:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch01.htm

Critique of the Gotha Programme:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/

Draft of a Communist Confession of Faith:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/06/09.htm

The Principles of Communism:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm

The Myths about Marxism:
marxist.com/the-myths-about-marxism.htm

Socialism: Utopian and Scientific
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/

I didn't mention philosophy as a course, did I?

faggot.

>takes a philosophy course
Not him but pretty sure the austist is the one making up fictional biographies for the people he discusses with.

Why would anyone need to read this hot garbage

I found a strap on in my mom's drawer. You must be who she uses it on.

because most people are too stupid to notice the flaws in his arguments or simply don't care

back to rebbit

You thought that was a funny insult but that's actually my fetish :3c

>wall of shitpost propaganda

WE STORMFAGS NOW

>i'm a newfag who arrived after the stormfag invasion and thinks that everyone that isn't a /pol/tard is from reddit
Back to your containment board.

back to rebbit

There's nothing wrong with /pol/, you're just an asshole.

What is your favorite philosopher

Marxist historiography is the best.

>I refuse to learn what the other opinions are about, but I'm still going to hate them

>propaganda
All of them are from Marx himself, except for like one

>their "means" become defined for them
What part of marx's work are you deducing this from?

>it's elitist, or at least leninism is
Irrelevant in a discussion about marx.

>it contradicts modern economics
Pseudoscience.

>marxist ideologues seek to (...)
Irrelevant in a discussion about marx.

>it's confrontational
Good.

>marxism appeals to naive people persuaded by emotional arguments
Marx work never appeals to moral/emotion in his work desu. Even the parts about industrial conditions of child labor in das kapital are mostly descriptive.

From a technical standpoint Marx had a lot of great ideas. Historical materialism and what not. His ideology itself is shit and only leads to decadent degeneracy.

>All of them are from Marx himself

Yes, and they are all propaganda

>There's nothing wrong with /pol/, you're just an asshole.
>entire board cucked by stormfucks
>nothing wrong

his idea was simple and totally made sense in the context of the time too bad the autism of the 20th century ballooned it into a massive monstrosity where feudal backwaters with no factories attempted to apply it while financialization and derivative markets radically transformed what capitalism means in the countries that used to have all of the factories

oh well

Yes, you are insufferable retards that seem unable to stay in your board and end up shitposting in unrelated boards/threads.

This

Marx had good ideas but all forms of communism are cancer

>Pseudoscience

as opposed to marxian """""economics""""". there's a reason why socialist countries always fail, you know

The entire board isn't cucked by /pol/, the entire board IS /pol/

I'm confused. What's wrong with Stormfront? Fascism and ethnic nationalism is just as valid as the beliefs of cum guzzling marxists.

>Modern economics
>Modern economics is one Monolith and there are no variations or schools of economics

What do Marxists think of Leszek Kołakowski?

/pol/ is containment for politics, not for ideology, dumb reddicuck

>Marxist
>calling anything else a pseudoscience

Theres a reason only basketcases "philosophers" worship him and not any actual economist

and if you are going to proudly say you are confrontational, then dont bitch after you get BTFO

Marxian economics have nothing to so with socialism/communism. Nice way to show you have no idea what you are talking about, m8.

>hurr durr superabundance is possible!

>Pseudoscience.

Pot, kettle.

He makes you feel good. Marxism is like crack for the cooperative, Christian mind.

>Theres a reason only basketcases "philosophers" worship him and not any actual economist
Not really true. There are no marxian orthodox economics of course, but that is a tautology.

Materialism doesn't make me feel good.

>Who's Antonio Gramci

NO ONE who knows anything about economics regards Marx in high regards. Only leftist space cadets do because they live in la la land where "muh theory" rules

Marxism is the creationism of economics

It should unless you're autistic

literally who

Sardinian manlet with tbc who received a far better treatment in fascist italy than fascists or even slightly right wing intellectuals received in communist countries.

...

>NO ONE who knows anything about economics regards Marx in high regards. Only leftist space cadets do because they live in la la land where "muh theory" rules
Again, false. Besides the obvious neomarxian school, the post-keynesians are probably the most important heterodox school and have marx in high regards.

>Marxism is the creationism of economics
Now, this is an internet meme from people who know shit about economics. Even if you thought marx is wrong, he was part of the classical orthodoxy of his time, he would be more like the equivalent of classical mechanics (vs modern quantum mechanics).

What does that have to do with his economics?

>Implying Marx created his materialism or his economicism
>implying the takeover of sociology by Marxists is due to the effectiveness of Marx's theories

Hey, if a strategy works.

>This entire fucking thread
youtube.com/watch?v=18qD9hmU9xg

Austrian school is quite literally the creatonism of economics, as in the believe in a literal god like figure, the invisible hand

His economics are still shit, like every other marxist.

Marxist are literally creationist-tier about pretty much every scientific subject they've written about. Another example would be idiotic radical environmentalism about psychological differences between individuals.

>thread about X
>hey guys, here's X's work in case you need it
>OH NO PROPAGANDA!
What the fuck are you doing in a thread about marx's work if you haven't read him and don't plan to?

you seem to be very educated on this matter

Yes, communism is pure ideology. If it was purely about science it would have been completely dead by now instead of just functionally dead with a few autists still goin around on the internet.

>i'll just repeat it until it sticks, without any actual arguments

>Fascism and ethnic nationalism is just as valid as the beliefs of cum guzzling marxists.
Some Marxists were nationalists.

Yep, I am

Most people who hate communism or socialism have been preconditioned to hate it by capitalist societies.

"Why do you want 20 hour work weeks? Are you lazy? You should work 40+ hours like everyone else, because if I can't be happy nobody else should."

>you have to prove a theory of economics that nobody in the field takes seriously to be wrong, it's not like I have to prove it to be true in the first place!

no

Name me all those wonderful communist societies in which the work week was of 20 hours.
Go ahead.
oh, wait...

>His economics are still shit, like every other marxist.
And why? Can you elaborate and Gramci's economics? Have you read any works by Gramci?

To be honest i don't adhere to marxian economics, i just think you are a retard that spouts memes without any knowledge of the subject.

Deutsche Demokratische Republik

>You need to have a degree in astrophysics to know the earth is round

Truly I have been enlightened

You're kidding, right?

Not necessarily 20 hours, but the Paris commune abolished night works.

Name one not-crumbling Capitalist nation.
Capitalism has always been a short-sighted get rich scheme. It cannot sustain its infinite growth and it functions similarly to a pyramid scheme.

No

Can't really decide, John Stuart Mill is kind of neat.

You will point out flaws like his comments on colonialism, however flaws inevitably arise when you try to tackle the real world. Marx said.

>The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.

Yet he didn't really go into the practical details, did he. For instance he goes straight into conversations with the assumption his hypothetical working classes and communists are morally virtuous because of class meme magic, capable of carrying out his abstract goals, ignoring one of the most ubiquitous dilemmas in philosophy.

It has lasted longer than any socialist nation that I know of

>Stalinism
>Communist

That explains your faggotry