Perfect historians don't exi

>Perfect historians don't exi

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0LsrkWDCvxg
youtube.com/watch?v=MRYzW3BSj0I[/spoiler]
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I'm afraid I have to contest that claim

>5 bait threads on the first page

He's a fucking socialist with a clear bias/agenda.

But considering Veeky Forums is full of commie retards, doesn't surprise me that the guy is liked.

if you seriously think he is well liked on this board then you obviously never post here

John "Muhammad's PBH favorite color" Green

Everyone hates him here, even the commies

never been tried

I thought Veeky Forums was full of national """socialists"""

Oww come on! Your own words indicate that you might have your own bias.
Green is of course nowhere near perfect. Agreed. But he isn't all too bad as people make it out to be.

Everyone has biases, it just so happens that John Green's biases don't fit your own worldview. You know, you could still watch his show and disagree with some of his viewpoints.

>learning history through 5 minute YouTube pophistory snippets

Is it normal that I feel the need to punch the wall everytime I see that stupid smug face

I don't care about how wrong he is, his early vids are comfy as fuck.

He's an Identitarian leftist and a liberal, not a real socialist. He's rich af thanks to his stupid books.

>never addresses biblical material properly

why bother listening to him?

This
Pop History is a meme

Not that guy but Green is meant to be an educator, he shouldn't have any bias desu.

>Not that guy but Green is meant to be an educator, he shouldn't have any bias desu.
True, but is such a thing even possible?

>THIS MACHINE KILLS FASCISTS

Seriously what kind of faggot puts a sticker like that on his laptop

I don't know but I can't watch a single one of his videos without looking at that dumb sticker.

Yeah, you just give pure information.

When you get to a part in history where there are two stories to what happened you tell both, then explain why each side took those points of view they did. Taking into account personal bias of the authors in the source material to try and reach a conclusion as to what happened.

Even better you find multiple sources of information. Primary sources can be just as biased as secondary ones.

youtube.com/watch?v=0LsrkWDCvxg
>ALEXANDER
>THE
>GREAT

[spoiler]Is he /our guy/? He uses the voltaire quote youtube.com/watch?v=MRYzW3BSj0I[/spoiler]

>Yeah, you just give pure information.
Sounds like common sense, but you still have to interpret information, right? Or are you saying that ain't so?

I explained how to do that in the rest of my post.

>I explained how to do that in the rest of my post.
Well, you still have to make a choice between multiple authors.
I am not stating you can't be "maximal objective", just skeptical that one can be "fully objective".

Though back on topic, everyone assumes here that Green is not at his most objective. So your point matters more as mine.

lurk more, or better yet go home you newfag /pol/ack lmao. It's a meme

>It's a meme
Don't you see what you are doing!? Just by turning him into a meme he is getting more and more famous, and more and more sheeple will fall for his devilish tricks.
It is not funny, this guy is getting a platform he shouldn't get!

This guy reached his zenith years before Veeky Forums even existed.

His takes on Mongols, Russians, French and Poles are disastrous .

post more kstew.

>This guy reached his zenith years before Veeky Forums even existed.
I guess, but you know this way it is only getting worse.

John, you have to go back.

>I like my cereal with multiple dicks.

probably gotta wait for robot overlords. but this dude isn't so bad, he's good for the masses.