Let's have a thread for these. Non-ancap ones also welcome, im just starting off the thread with some

Let's have a thread for these. Non-ancap ones also welcome, im just starting off the thread with some.

...

...

...

...

...

.

gif

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

>personal freedoms are being overtaken by government!
>wishes to infringe on the personal freedoms of minorities and such

i don't get alt-right sometimes

i don't even get the fucking word because it's such a buzzword

...

What are you talking about, you dweeb.

Nice double dubs

...

what is, memery aside, the alt-right in an american definition?

a loose coalition of white/civic nationalists, paleocons, reactionaries, anti-sjws, who hate multiculturalism and globalism

The "Alt-Right" is a catch-all term invented to categorize all people who despise the modern political Establishment [especially the Left Wing of it] and view the modern Right Wing as weak and compromising if not outright controlled opposition.

The term has no dogma, no set of agreed political goals, no leaders, and mostly serves as a public front for /pol/ on one hand and a honey pot for Jews trying to subvert the opposition on the other.

Common trends who include nationalism [both ethnic and civic], more libertarian social policies [more free speech, guns, etc], etc.

Also they worship frogs and perform black magic to try and kill celebrities.

I feel like this is how it started, but not what it's become. The modern "alt right" has been corrupted just like the "progressive left" became the "regressive left".

Corrupted by what?

schizophrenic basement dwellers mostly

I would say that the movement has been corrupted by neo nazism. Pay attention to alt righters on Twitter or /pol/, and you will notice extreme similarities with them and BLM + third wave feminists. Even popular figures that associate with the alt right, often firmly claim that they are not one of them. Milo Yiannopolous is one example.

how can they be corrupted by what they've always been?
le rightwing homo will say literally anything if it'll get him attention.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

fixed version

...

Why is Anarcho___ such a meme ideology?

...

i dunno but here's some antran

>unironically using "le"

>>>>>>>>>>plebbit

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

what ideology is this

...

anarcho transhumanism

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

that's all fucks

but that guy was forced by his backers to shoot himself.

>Pay attention to alt righters on Twitter or /pol/, and you will notice extreme similarities with them and BLM + third wave feminists.

that's how you do politics on social media

...

...

...

>more libertarian social policies

no, it's right-wing social policies.

More like grammatical-anarchism...

>the state is immoral
>immoral
You are not being the egoist Mr. Stirner knew you could be.

Anarchism, beyond what Stirner proposed - he didn't condone or condemned the state at all, he just shared his way of seeing the world, is moral stance on statehood foremost. Any practical considerations are balanced precariously on that moral axis.

>oligarchic planet state
>not a social media global consortium

...

alt-right is like porn its hard to define but you know it when you see it

here's a template
what is the grey one by the way?

Kek

Anarcho-nihilism I assume.

...

fuck yes. would like to see more of this in my lifetime.

>more libertarian social policies

Not according to any generally accepted definition of the terms 'libertarian' or 'social policies,' no. Even the 'free speech' platform plank is less about the actual legal concept of freedom of speech, i.e. protections against government retaliation, and is more about imposing speech on others by depriving private entities of their property rights, forcing them to let you say whatever you want, wherever you want, with no consequences. Not to mention that the rest of the alt-right social agenda could be summed up as "fuck minorities and fuck immigrants" stances that would charitably be described as "not at all in the slightest libertarian."

children don't get pregnant and are even less likely to menstruate if they are constantly preforming heavy labour

>allow entry
>invading property
the NAP would say that this isn't a violation if you allowed it

The fees to enforce the phrase would far outweigh any royalties gained in this scenario so it would never happen

actually good

Hillary clinton is still alive

two fallacies do not make an argument

Real socialism/communism requires slow process and not revolution. Furthermore, "dialectical inevitability" isn't really a solid argument

This is barely half-true

It's not within your egoist self-interest to die, so you'd necessarily avoid doing actions that would cause that outcome

He can't legally create a state with someone else's property AND it would be a huge waste of resources to fire a tomahawk missile so this wouldn't happen.

Birds eat and shit seeds, but they don't create agriculture. The definition of beginning agriculture is definitely not this.

Sad but true

Hitler doesn't represent the whole of the right wing, and nobody ganged up on germany just because they were right wing.

They weren't all slavs and they weren't massively united under some "slav" banner by any means. Furthermore, what's wrong with hiring strong forces?

They didn't invent sunglasses

this is just false. it's not like the eastern ones stopped. it's not like the western ones were invited

Spooks are ideas that are served to your detriment. If the nap is not to your detriment, it's not a spook.

the people forming pol weren't an outside raid

soundwaves aren't necessarily a form of aggression

You can't just build a refrigerator, electricity, stoves(electrical) out of nowhere. It takes a fully functioning society. If your surroundings are an-prim, you can't accomplish this.

...

Holy mother of autism

autism

Holy fuck do you even know what a joke is. Have you ever told a joke in your whole life? When somebody tells you a joke do you say "Well that wouldn't actually happen!"?

primitive cultures deduce as well

Having access to bronze-making isn't necessarily non-primitive.

Fire isn't non-primitive

Footwear isn't non-primitive.

Cooking meat isn't non-primitive

Using salt isn't non-primitive

Written communication isn't non-primitive

How can you begin to live a primitive lifestyle if you haven't been taught to survive?

Possible

Movies aren't real life, plus the human body isn't a good source of fuel

Brothels being illegal doesn't mean the people operating them have to necessarily die.

Having a harder rock doesn't mean you can out-fight a group of people

Sharpening rocks isn't non-primitive.

Castration doesn't put an end to the oppressive power structures of the cis-white patriarchy

ten million hours is 1141 years, and even in a transhumanist society, childhood would still be defined by the early biological development.

There is nothing anarchic about running for election

Nobody will live the 228 years necessary to do so.

Real life isn't videogames. Also, if you're having an office with your mind, you don't need to necessarily be at the physical location.

Everyone doesn't necessarily have to follow a particular ideology for it to be valid

mud huts aren't non primitive.

communication isn't non-primitive. Birds squak to each other, but they don't form civilizations

that would violate the NAP

"Society is crumbling" is a meme itself

Violation of the NAP

The host population isn't overthrown because it gave the people the right to move in.

Communists understand that they have to work

The "necessary failure" of the collectively run farms is referring to a non-anarchic real world example

lower classes can be fascists too.

...

...

...

...

There's an important distinction between personal and private property

An exchanged of intellectual contributions doesn't necessitate a product of higher quality

Thanks. Enjoy your (You)s

This isn't even coherent

fair enough

That kind of education doesn't necessarily lead to right wing politics, seeing as how the majority of former US students aren't /pol/

Jokes should be at least mildly consistent or aware of the things they're criticizing. As you can see, I enjoyed and agreed with a few of the posts

Neck yourself.