Are they the most important nation in Western history, Veeky Forums?

Are they the most important nation in Western history, Veeky Forums?

>Charlemagne
>Gave us modern England through William
>Responsible for most architectural and artistic innovations throughout history
>Absolutism and later French Revolution changed politics tremendously in their respective times
>Napoleon

Many will reply "muh Britain" but Britain wouldn't exist in its current state were it not for its French ruler, William the Conqueror. It would have been a warring collective of German tribes just like >H>R>E.

France was clearly the premier nation in Western history

for all the ouaibooism the frog i am can have it's the mix of all the nation in europe and their conflict that have made wetern europe what it is

By that logic Germany is the greatest country in Europe

almost always getting raped by Germany though

>Italian wars
>Seven Years wars
>Franco-Prussian wars
>WWII

Probably yes, although its really the interaction between britain and france that is important rathe than either of them in isolation

France wouldnt wouldnt exist in its modern state if it werent for british intervention either

France was the most important nation until 1815.

Then it was Britain until 1900

Then it was Germany until 1945

Then it was the US

China is next

>Germany
>Germany
>Germany
>Germany
No.

>Charlemagne
Connecting Charlemagne and the French nation is retarded.
>Responsible for most architectural and artistic innovations throughout history
No, just no.
>Absolutism and later French Revolution changed politics tremendously in their respective times
The French Revolution was cancer.

charlemagne was german.

last one was Germany though

>Italian wars
Not Germany.

>Seven Years wars
Not Germany and in Europe it was basically a draw

Also conveniently leaves out all the other wars where France was making the various German states their bitch: 30 Years War, Napoleonic Wars, etc.

>The French Revolution was cancer.
It still changed politics tremendously and is the foundation of modern political life, for better or for worse

>frenc7h revolution
>take away the rulers of merchants and nobles
>revoluciooon
>rulers noiw merchants and nobles

daily reminder peasants were royalists.

>Pre-revolutionary France.
>Nation.
It didn't even speak one language at the time qeq.

I count the Seven years war as a German war

So France before the revolution is a nation

damage control

>and in Europe it was basically a draw
Status quo means defense won.

>charlemagne
TBF Germany can lay a roughly equal claim.

>China is next
They're nuking their soil with nitrites, there'll be an amazingly huge famine inside this half of the century.

>Charlemagne
>French

The Kingdom of England was created 100 years before William was born.

>Ordinance of Villers-CotterĂȘts

Just because some faggots spoke Bretagne or Occitaine at home doesn't mean that they didn't also speak french.

Normans were a separate nation, them speaking a langue d'oil doesn't change that.

Also, the Anglo-Saxons had one of the best administrative systems in Western-Europe, they wouldn't have needed the Normans.

They had the best, unless you count Al-Andalus as Western Europe.

>ouaibooism
It's called ouiaboux

Charlemagne was born in France but died in Germany and a good chunk of his legacy was the Holy Roman Empire, encompassing most of Germany so I'd say he's equally French and German.
William the Conqueror was only a couple generations removed from Rollo, a Viking who took Normandy by force from the French. The fact that William spoke French doesn't mean he was French, just like you wouldn't call an American a Brit just because they speak English.
What did the French even do that they didn't take directly from Rome (in the form of Neo-Classicism) or some other source other than the Gothic style, which is now obsolete?
The French Revolution just sucked. It's basically a really ugly, unsuccessful version of the American Revolution, which it sought to imitate (so I guess modern France is a legacy of America, huh?)
Napoleon only really affected Europe in that he brought all of Europe to bear against the threat of French Universal Monarchy under a Napoleonic Empire. The long term affect of this was that Britain ended up usurping France as Europe's dominant power once and for all, and began France's long and painful decline.

France made Europe better because the whole country sucked.

>Responsible for most architectural and artistic innovations throughout history

Literally what? You base that on what exactly?

>Gave us modern England through William the Conqueror

Right as if you could consider Normandy "French".

>peasants were royalists.
False. Some were, many weren't. It varied greatly by region.

>Right as if you could consider Normandy "French"
They considered themselves French, see pic

okay but lets be real here, thats Old French, which is basically latin, so the translation could just as soon mean "franks" as it does "french". or william's army could've been made up of actual frenchmen. or the weaver could just be an actual frenchman.

It is believed that the tapestry wasn't made by a Norman artist, but by an Anglo-Saxon. It doesn't tell us conclusively how the Normans percieved themselves.

Oh fuck off. If foreign nations perceived a group as French who gives a fuck what the group itself thinks. Deadset contrarians like you are the lowest of the low.

Are you serious?

bruh you need to take a chill pill. how a group defines itself is the best way to define that group, rather than by the misnomers and generalizations assigned it by outsiders.

It was made by an Anglo-Saxon, yes, but clearly for a Norman patron

he probably didn't ask his patron about every word he should use so the point still stands

Nope it is Russia.
White christians are the chosen people of God after all, not the yellow midgets.

Nope it is Poland.
White christians and jews are the chosen people of God after all, not the yellow midgets.

>Poland
>White

>Normans
>French
Pick one

One can trace all the most tumultuous shifts, stratospheric achievements, and worst evils of the modern world back to Paris.

>russia
Russia is a shithole and not at all white or Christian as you /pol/tards somehow believe.

Culturally french
Spoke french
Lived in France
Duchy located was a vassal of the french king
Ethnically french from his mother and paternal grandmother

"Muh he wasn't french he was a normand" Yeah, at the time differences didn't existed anymore. Normandy was already completely absorbed by France

>generated their own unique culture in attempt to break vassalage with French king
>conquered England, Italy and CS in attempt to become powerful enough to break from France
>successive kings do go to war with France but lose
But remember guys they're totes French

what are you smoking? Fascism was Italian, Communism was German, Representative Democracy was American (Parliament didn't represent the people), Monarchical Absolutism has existed for as long as there have been kings, and the Industrial Revolution was British. The modern world was built on the backs of every nation in Europe but France.

t. Englishman

Wewuzism from France of all countries. You frogs already have your own history, there's no need to steal from others

Friendly reminder that "English" "language" is 75% derived from French

pic related are russian citizens

and a human shares about 75% of their dna with a mouse, but nobody's calling us rodents, are they?

T. Rule maker

Western European history is just French history, nothing else matters

They must vie with the Spanish, and the English.

But yes, they are the first really significant Western power.

The Mongol Empire is rising again.

No, the most important country in world history is Britain.

And William wasn't French he was Norman.

but the chinks will be the next God's choosen people in a few decades more

T. William Brockshire

t. Lindybiege

You're just jealous of the might and greatness of the British people.

Well

If that happen, the Chinese will be the next World's leaders, but first Russia must collapse, in the whole history, only one (true) Christian empire was ever allowed to exist, not two at the same time.

>If that happen, the Chinese will be the next World's leaders, but first Russia must collapse, in the whole history, only one (true) Christian empire was ever allowed to exist, not two at the same time.

Byzantine and the Franks under Charlemagne & co existed at the same time

>napoleon was corsican or italian but certainly not french
>except at trafalgar and waterloo