Is this accurate?

Is this accurate?

Other urls found in this thread:

wh.gov/itBoG
youtube.com/watch?v=853GwPRk19M
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

No because there are numerous safeguards in place to ensure that the police do not overstep the boundaries that are set by higher powers. Criminals don't have anyone to hold them accountable (except the police)

Also, saged

muhh use of straw man fallacy and emotionally loaded words

The brilliant idea that we limit the legitimate use of force to a small group of people controlled by elected officials that follow legalistic rules, in order to prevent arbitrary use of force by an unlimited group of people.

Statism: The brilliant idea that:
>we forgo our right to murder and in exchange be promised not to be murdered.
>we forgo our right to use anything we find and in exchange be promised that others won't use our stuff
>we forgo our right to rape and in exchange be promised that others won't rape us

Of course this brilliant idea requires enforcement, easiest done by punishing those breaking the social contract.

none of those are real rights

Okay, call them freedoms.
You are free to do whatever the fuck you want, and exchange some of that freedom for protection from other people's freedoms.

A state where this is possible is not subject to statism, but lawlesness. breaking the social contract results in action in accordance to the law. Meanwhile checks and balances exist to prevent such malignent abuse of the system as OPs pic describes.

At least in a functioning democracy

wh.gov/itBoG

This petition directly prohibits the trafficking and molestation of children. It is directed at criminal and religious extremist organizations who contribute to the culture of, participate in the culture of, and perpetuate a culture where children are exposed to sexualization, kidnapping, enslavement, chemical-sexual-physical-emotional-mental and social abuse. This petition seeks to address said perpetrators as terrorists and enemies of the state, and the society the state presides over, and seeks to authorize the use of military wartime force to eliminate any culture or perpetuation of pedophilia.

>>No because there are numerous safeguards in place to ensure that the police do not overstep the boundaries that are set by higher powers.
all false

>the court of law doesn't exist because i say so
Ok

The fact that no anarchic societies exist, proves it is accurate. State was indeed a brilliant idea.

t.Mohammed Abdul Jamal, posting from Somalia

Say it with me kids: Monopoly of Force and 'Tribalism.'

You should only trust your neighbor to stab you in his back because there's no guarantee that they will follow basic morality or look out for your best interests.

More over you should trust a large group who is not your group to go after your resources and supplies.

People unsurprisingly will fuck eachother over if they can find a decent excuse and a way to profit so States are formed around the notion of a social contract. The idea being that everyone in that group follows the contract and will benefit from its shared protections. In this manner Group A is protected from Group B's inevitable treachery.

the notion of a stateless society is a pure pipedream born of people who refuse to understand basic economics or human behaviour. Or you know, just history.

Social Anarchy is impossible above a small community level and I'd much rather deal with all the bullshit that comes from having a police force than deal with a world where the best I can do is hope some band of marauders with more guns and people than my group decides to leave me alone.

Which is what happens when you don't at least TRY to enable Rule of Law and keep an armed force to maintain order. Yes they're going to have to deal with citizens in your own nation who break the law but they're there to keep the people of other nations from taking your land and murdering you.

You do not live in a vacuum and if you somehow dissolved all the government machinery that keeps society working the state next door to you would just move in and set up shop.

Name one current government that doesn't imprison, kidnap, harass, steal from, and kill people


Also name one practical government that doesn't do that.

Except the only people that can enforce those safeguards are the police, and they're not going to do shit about it if one of them does anything. They gotta look out for one another, y'know?

>the police is nice because somebody wrote in some book that the police should be nice


kys, KYS

>people unironically defending statism
Go to Hussein's torture chamber in NYC, why don't you?

Hmm well it sure wasn't cops that held up the pizza hut four times so even if cops are as bad as you're making them out I'll go with the one that at least has to go to a judge and pretend to have a reason if they want to break into my house

tl;dr

Why would you do that? A robber is a person persecuted and jailed by a judge while an officer is one allowed into your home with nothing but """probable cause"""

That was actually quite hard to read.

>>we forgo our right to murder and in exchange be promised not to be murdered.

Try to resist arrest for not paying taxes and see how long you last without getting murdered.

>>we forgo our right to use anything we find and in exchange be promised that others won't use our stuff

Any "stuff" you find, create, earn, buy, sell, or even bequeathe to your children, the state will FORCIBLY take a portion of. Again, try to resist this INITIATION OF PHYSICAL FORCE against you, and see how long you last without being murdered or kidnapped and taken to a state dungeon, where you will probably be raped after all.

Nice try, bootlicking cuck. Come back and try again after you've sucked some more state cock.

Sadly, statism is the only way that overpopulated societies can function at least decently. Anarchy can only be applied with small groups of people.
Imagine at least one week of anarchy in, say, the United States. It would be mayhem.
Hell, not even small tribes in the Amazonia have anarchic societies.

>benefit from state services
>don't want to pay for them

Ok, what else should be in place then? I mean this has been throughout human history. We have it better than any other civilization on this planet. Our police force can be held to certain action, just because you don't hear about it on the news doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Also cops aren't your fucking friends, do everything in your power to avoid them. If you do come into contact, listen to everything. If you felt like they did anything wrong. Then you can report it, at least this way you'll be alive.
>inb4 anecdotic shit

Yeah sure, but it's a group that acts predictably and is controlled protecting you from random violent acts from random unpredictable strangers.

>politics
>2016
Let us immediately repeat what we have already said a hundred times before, since there are no ready ears for such truths.

We know all too well how offensive it still sounds when someone classifies human beings as animals, without disguises or allegory; using expressions like “herd instinct” for direct reference to people having “political opinions.” The West, along with the world it dominates, has become unanimous in all major moral judgements: people clearly know what Socrates claimed not to know, and what that famous old snake once promised to teach, – people these days “know” what is good and evil. Now it must sound harsh and strike the ear quite badly when we keep insisting on the following point: what it is that claims to know here, what glorifies itself with its praise and reproach and calls itself good is the instinct of the herd animal man. Morality these days is the morality of herd animals : – and therefore, as we understand things, it is only one type of human morality beside which, before which, and after which many other (and especially higher) moralities are or should be possible. But this morality fights tooth and nail against such a “possibility” and such a “should”: it stubbornly and ruthlessly declares “I am morality itself and nothing else is moral!” And in fact, with the aid of a religion that indulged and flattered the loftiest herd desires, things have reached the point where this morality became increasingly realised in political and social institutions: democratising movements are the heirs to Christianity.

Yet the tempo of this morality is still too slow and lethargic for those with less patience, those sick or addicted to the above-mentioned instinct. This is attested to by the increasingly frantic howling, increasingly undisguised snarling of “alt right” dogs that now wander the alleyways of Western culture, in apparent opposition to the peaceable and industrious “liberals” and ideologists of redistribution, to the ageing, ignorant and emasculated “conservatives” which they usurped, to the naïve noble savagery of “libertarians” and “anarchists”, and still more to the silly philosophasters and brotherhood enthusiasts who call themselves socialists and want a “free society.”

But, in fact, these are one and all united in thorough and instinctive hostility towards all forms of society besides that of the autonomous herd (even to the point of rejecting the concepts of “master” and “slave”); they are united in their dogged opposition to any special claims, special rights, or privileges (which means, in the last analysis, that they are opposed to any rights: since when everyone is equal, no one will need “rights” any more –); they are united in their mistrust of globalist justice (as if it were a violation of those who are weaker); but they are likewise united in the religion of pity for what they believe suffers; they are united in cries and impatience of pity, in deadly hatred against suffering in general, in the almost feminine inability to sit watching, to let suffering happen; they are united in the way they involuntarily raise the general level of sensitivity and gloom under whose spell the world seems threatened with a new Buddhism; united in faith in the morality of communal pity as morality in itself, the achieved height of humanity, sole hope for the future, solace of the present, the great redemption of all the past: – united in their faith in community as Redeemer: in the herd, in “politics”.

>benefits from lord's land
>doesn't want to pay rent

And how do you think humanity would progress in the State of Nature?

Also true

you know that progress is to have many goods and services for cheap, right? no you do not, since you are a 20 yo undergrad

It is a brilliant idea though.

"Statism" is the libertarian equivalent of a pedophile accusing somebody of being a adult fucker.

Adults are gross. Why would anyone fuck them?

>a random mob of angry people is more rational and just than cops

This is what anarchists actually believe.

I benefit very little from state services but apparently the government benefits a lot from my money and now they want more.

...

anarkiddies belong in the gulag

it's a foolish reductionism

>Try to resist arrest for not paying taxes and see how long you last without getting murdered.

Forever. You don't get murdered for not paying tax.
Refusing to pay leads to being forced to pay.

Where is the issue here?
If you use land that you don't own to produce, thus eroding and exploiting the land, you have to pay the owner.

Probably in a dystopia, yeah

>mfw crypto-anarchism will make all states that arent oppressive dystopias crumble

courts really don't do shit against police who abuse their power most of the time, indicting a cop is extremely difficult and pretty much frowned upon in the justice system.

> we
No, the impotent anclap who made this picture has no powet to give rights to anyone.

The point is to only take liberty from those who would take it indiscriminately - i.e. criminals.

Does it work perfectly? Of course not. But I'd rather live in a free society under the rule of law than some anarchist dystopia.

Yes. But it leaves out the important part, which is that we establish a whole formal system by which the first small group operates, and we call it "law".

That is why rule of law and the concept of human rights were created.

...

Welp that's it I'm moving over to Somalia now

Priest - Level 4

The Seven Levels of Kekism

youtube.com/watch?v=853GwPRk19M