ITT: memes that need to die

ITT: memes that need to die

>the civil war was about states rights
>hitler would've won if he had listened to his generals
>france always surrender lel
>in 1776, britain was the most powerful nation on earth, with the best army on the planet
>everyone in the middle ages thought the world was flat
>mussolini was an evil racist
>britain and france started ww2
>germany started ww1

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7qV-BGF4
civil-war.net/pages/southcarolina_declaration.asp
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>the tsar deserved it

>byzantine was the sucessor of rome

>holy
>roman
>empire

It wasn't the sucessor of rome

it WAS rome

>Christian heritage is European tradition and must never be destroyed
>when Christians themselves completely destroyed the pagan heritage of Europe

>Charles De Gaulle wasn't one of the best statesmen in history

Varg go fuck your autistic wife so she can pump out some more aryan benefits babies

kill yourself neo pagan

>americans do everything for him while he hides like a pussy
>in his speech he takes responsibility for france's liberation

...

We're not arguing with you, we just think you're autistic.

...

>Crusaders was a self-defense

>the civil war was about states rights
It was, or is this gonna be >muh slavery thread
>in 1776, britain was the most powerful nation on earth, with the best army on the planet
Name more powerful one

>It was, or is this gonna be >muh slavery thread
Yeah I agree, OP is a faggot.

>Name more powerful one
France

Unless you think revolutionary france's ability to conquer europe came out of ideological magic

Well you could try and dispute the
>best army
part, but in reality no matter how powerful they were and how good their navy was they weren't capable of effectively projecting that power across an entire ocean back in the age of sail.

It was about slavery faggot.

>Name more powerful one
France
Spain
Austria

>the american war of independence was fought by americans
>the americans won militarily

>hitler would've won if he had listened to his generals

probably true though desu

>Spain
>Late 18th century
>Austria ever
You don't belong here.

>france always surrender lel


THE LIES HAVE TO STOP

>It was about slavery faggot.

What about the fact that the Southerners were living in poverty and basically second class citizens?

Spain had a larger colonial empire and a larger standing army.

Wouldn't argue about France tbqh.
Wouldn't dispute Spain as an answer, I don't know enough about its history to do so.

But
>Austria
My sides.

And no, acw wasn't about slavery. The fact that south's economy was reliant on it doesn't mean that it was the cause of the war. Your statement is the myth senpai, that's the shit children around the globe are taught in high school.

Only if they'd advice him not to start the war with the rest of the world.

They were tricked by wealthy land owners into fighting to retain slavery.

If it was about state rights, the state's right to what exactly?

Impossibru. Germany couldn't win against US, USSR and GB together, and any notion of possibility of taking out GB early on and preventing US from joining in are meme-tier since Germany had neither the ships nor the planes for it. Even fighting USSR one-on-one would've had bad odds, and US is out of reach of any meaningful counterattack.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7qV-BGF4

>If it was about state rights, the state's right to what exactly?
Not be second class citizens in their own country?

Please tell me all about how they were second class citizens.

Fun Fact: Davis himself literally said the CSA was founded on the philosophy the negro was not equal to the white man

>If it was about state rights, the state's right to what exactly?
The right to secede)))

'Our new government is founded upon exactly [this] idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.[1]'

Hitler could have prevented Dunkirk which would have resulted in Churchill never becoming prime minister. Instead he wanted to signalize the UK that he was willing to end the war with Britain. Pretty much every British politian wanted to negotiate with Hitler. If he would continue listening to his generals at this point, he would invade the UdSSR and the war would be over in his favor.

>Hitler could have prevented Dunkirk
No. There are no historical sources backing up this myth.

The real reason the Germans stopped was to refuel and resupply, to prevent another battle of the marne. Guderian himself said this.

t. Jean Claude le Grenouille

Everyone please read.

civil-war.net/pages/southcarolina_declaration.asp

...

Confederate apologisist BTFO

>All these christfags triggered as fuck

>desert death cult
>neo-""""""pagan"""""" LARPers
Different flavours of same shit.

>Any form of authoritarianism I don't like is automatically fascism

...

>implying that is true
>Recognizing that paganism, Faustian spirit and Greek culture is Europe's true heritage and not Christianity makes you a neo-pagan

Churchill was already PM.

>saying "true heritage" with a stirner pic

>implying it can't be a spook and 'true heritage' at the same time

>hahaha morality doesn't exist so i'll post Nietzsche and stirner i'm so well read
>who cares that paganism is also a system of arbitrary morals and Nietzsche stated religion itself existed to hold people back from achieving their potential

>linbybeige is a historian

He's a dance techer

t. cucked by lindy

He has a bach degree. In archeology of all things. At least a quarter of posters here probably has more formal education in history than him.

Spain still had a bigger empire than Britain in the late 18th century
Britain was really just a 2nd rate european nation
The meme of it being a superpower during the US Revolution was created by Americans who purpotedly (for the most intelligent of them) confuse 1776 Britain with the late 19th century one (the one that ruled 1/3rd of the world) to make their victory seem more impressive

>> Children around the globe being taught about the american civil war

Lmao delusional as fuck
Not even in the states its correctly taught

>The muslims fear the crusaders
>When almost every crusade ended in failure
Deus vultards are a special kind of stupid.

>Spain is BIG
>BIG means STRONG
BIG means your forces are more spread out and it's harder to defend yourself.

>the civil war was about states rights

true

and the lynchpin issue was slavery

if it had been over something minor it wouldn't have caused a secession

>Austria
>My sides.

You're laughing but Austria was easily the 2nd most powerful country in Europe (after France) during the late 18th century
They didnt have any projection so they're irrelevant in the scope of colonial wars, but in Europe they were tough shit
Austria itself was quite huge, but in addition to that they also owned current Germany, Italy, Belgium and Prussia was their vassal under the HRE
Pic related, everything in yellow was basically Austria's possession

The spanish Empire was strong though. They had an incredibly powerful trade network and access to huge amounts of resources, an insanely large population with their colonies and an impressive army and navy.

The war of independence wasn't very impressive.

I wasn't mocking morality and pointing out that Christianity is not a native European culture but something that was imported into Europe

> They had an incredibly powerful trade network and access to huge amounts of resources
All of that benefitted the Dutch and English more than it ever did the Spanish since 17th century
>an insanely large population with their colonies
That was never used for anything significant
>impressive navy
kek

>That was never used for anything significant
That's not what we're debating. We're debating if they were more powerful than England.
>kek
Great argument

>That's not what we're debating
It is though. All that population is dead weight, Spanish didn't use them in anything because they couldn't, because of logistics alone.
>Great argument
Your statement demanded such a response.

>Rome fell because of [one single reason that perfectly supports my political views]

No one's saying that 18th century Spain was an ebin superpower
We're just saying that England was even weaker

>It is though. All that population is dead weight, Spanish didn't use them in anything because they couldn't, because of logistics alone.
Except for taxation and industry. Militarily useless, but economically powerful.

>Your statement demanded such a response.
The Spanish Navy was strong as fuck. Maybe not as powerful as the British or French, but still a powerful fleet. Due to Spain's more or less good relationship with France, they used their navy more than their army.

It was lead used in the tableware.

>not Christianity
>not mass immigration
>not an out of control bourgeois class
>not the rise of feudalism

why are you seriously responding to a joke post you fucking autist

>expanding on the joke he derived from my original post is serious

t. lead in aquaducts

He's not me though. But for real, I saw the lead theory pushed a couple times on History Channel back before their ancient aliens era. It wasn't the sole theory proposed, but to this day I think this is the most retarded explanation in history of anything.

I am from a slavic country and slavery has always been presented as the reason for ACW to begin.

Also,
>ever using American education as an argument

This.

Every single state (except for Texas) in their secession statements specifically referred to their rights as slave-owning states. Even Kansas, who's population initially didn't want to be a slave-owning state.

Actually I'm a bit wrong. It was actually Florida, not Texas.

Fucking This

...

Shit wrong pic

>Islamic golden age

>Britain ever won a war

yeah dude and the fucking anglo-saxons aren't "native" to britain either and no one says they aren't a native culture to the british isles in this day and age

unless i'm accidentally about to start a hot new meme of "romano-britain revivalism"

And yet hes probably more successful than half of this board.

>2nd most powerful country in Europe
That wpuld be Russia. Also Austria's army was garbage

>>in 1776, britain was the most powerful nation on earth, with the best army on the planet
If the British Army landed in Europe, I'd get the Belgian police to arrest them.

#utterdecimation

This. The british army was small and poorly equipped.

What?

It's disturbing to me that so little amount of people know about the truth of WW1

>the civil war wasn't about states rights
The civil war was caused by a variety of factors including and not limited to: States rights, slave ownership, sectionalism, taxes and tarrifs, and a prominate southern aristocracy.

"I have no intention to bring political or economic equality between the negro and the white man"
-Abraham Lincoln

This.

>Nazi Germany was a utopia if you were 'Aryan'

It was actually hella used in the f*ckin'epic, reddit

Slavery was the overwhelming factor.

Obviously not, but the war was to end slavery, not racial equality.

>slavery was the overwhelming factor
It was caused by a large combination of factors, none explicitly dominate than the others by any matter other than opinion.

varg vikerness

Pretty sure France lost that war to the British mate. The British didn't have the strongest army at the time but they did have the strongest military

>all Christianity is bad and there are no exceptions

So much Christian hate in this thread. Atleast we had managed to reform,unlike the jews and mudslimes. Why even bother hating us,we are your friends. I understand you not liking catholics though.fuck the new socialist pretender pope. He is a poor exscuse of a pope and he will burn in hell with the rest of the sinners he is exscusing and protecting.

>France lost the revolutionary wars

And if you mean the napoleonic wars
>lost to the British

>not to the huge coalition

>we

Stopped reading there.

Kill yourself, christcuck.

That is not an arguement and you know it

>all these neo-pagans implying that paganism is any different from the abrahamic religions
It's all a bunch of stupid "traditions" and "moral" ideas that only have emotional use and delay man's evolution. One should rely on reason and logic, not arbritrary stories from cavemen who barely knew how to survive

>the civil war was about states rights
But it is true, it just so happens that the main right in question was the right to own slaves.