Veeky Forums approved youtube historians

don't forget Skallagrim

>if I keep posting it long enough Veeky Forums will adopt it as true

to be fair that strategy actually works on Veeky Forums

t. buttmad frog

>Sargon of Dickwad

>don't forget Skallagrim

>furry
>tranny wife
>neo pagan
>voluntary castration

...

>Extra Credits

Prove it

I like how you added Historia Civilis at the end so it doesn't look like complete bait.

go away lindy

>>John Green
>>History Buffs
>>Shadiversity
>>Metatron
>>Sargon of Akkad

...

Lindybeige doesn't even have a history degree, he's an idiot pseud.

History Buffs started strong but he annoyed me so much with his retarded Apocalypto review.

>Lindybeige
Weapons and warfare. Meh.

>Shadiversity
Weapons and warfare. Meh.

>Metatron
Weapons and warfare. Meh.

Is this the best we can do? I also like to look at people making accurate swords and shit but come on. There's so much potential. History on youtube can be so interesting instead I always see people recommending the same type of shit.

This one is good. Interesting presentation (it isn't just one guy talking to camera), thorough, trips to historical places and so on.

>ctrl+f: Ellie Mackin
>0 of 0
ytho

>that hair
>those glasses
>that face

hmmmm, I bet I can learn a lot about the evil white male history from her

The irony is that the Bren was actually Czech.

>Sargon of Akkad
does he even do history videos? I've only heard him throw in a few anectodes of how "because this is what happened in the roman empire, it applies 100% to contemporary times". He's not very fun to watch either, he just complains constantly and always attacks the lowest hanging fruit. When he goes on his hyperbolic 15 second laughs where he goes "Y...You can
t be serious, this has to be THE, THE Dumbest, THING I've heard" it makes me want to kill myself.

youtube.com/watch?v=7EHhV-DRBSg

>voluntary castration
really?

>the great war
my nigga, I love that channel. Great idea to have it play out 100 years after the first one between 2014-2018 as well.

t. Butthurt kraut
t. Butthurt albion

He is a dance teacher
Need I say more

>History Buffs started strong but he annoyed me so much with his retarded Apocalypto review.
Same. This guy is relatively new, someone posted him earlier this week and he's uploading freqently now.
youtu.be/kievfh6x29Y

(You)

Only about under employment, note taking and research planing
youtube.com/watch?v=4ajchR4Ykpg

Seconding. They dip into some annoying myths like "DUDE WAR IS POINTLESS AND EVERY SIDE WAS BASICALLY EQUAL LMAO" and "DUDE DOUGLAS HAIG A SHIT LMAO", but overall it's good. They're also very thorough with the amount of videos they have, so it's good listening when you've got nothing better to do. Also love that they constantly throw around numbers.

>no Military History Visualized

this guys pretty good

>YouTube Historians
This was your first mistake.

Can you say if, being someone who doesn't know enough history to refute these myths extemporaneously, it is safe for me to watch this channel and come out clean?

Probably, yeah. There's nothing overtly terrible I remember about their videos, it's mostly fine. The sheer volume of content might be coloring my perception though.

Scholagladiatoria

>watermelon seller

context pls

>Military History Visualized
His attempts at refuting Lindybeige were pathetic

No one can refute LindyBeige

>Historia Civilis

everyone likes Historia Civilis

Sargon doesn't even do history videos

He actually does although most of them are in his secondary channel called "Ancient Recitations".

Hear the Gospel!
youtube.com/watch?v=H0qe45Z8wfk

It's pretty much right in the name.

Mark Blyth is an interesting fellow, if you want a historical perspective on economics and politics.

ne he is horrible he is just reading out wiki articles and animates them.

You can really detect the beta histoirans on this board, all these yt channels are horrible and for lazy cunts that are not willing to read a paper or a book.

1Day after the video you talk to your buddies and start a sentence: " Did you know that the xxxx actually xxxx" (Damn I am smart)

The great War channel ist the best out of all of these horrible beta cringe (easy history for 10yo channels).

History with Hilbert seems to be the only one who actually knows something

youtube.com/watch?v=bP1eXWIt-rE

Also:

Lindy BTFO
youtube.com/watch?v=6dPpByJuSv4&t=103s

History Buffs BTFO
youtube.com/watch?v=kievfh6x29Y

no he just got a vesectomy because he doesnt want kids

But he is not wrong.

And what is your idea of serious and difficult history?

Real Crusades History of course.

He has an arcaeology degree.

>John Green
He's a moron, gets triggered by the word warlord. Also, the human geography series on his channel shows just how reputable his videos are.

>Metatron
>Lindybeige
Clever, but also pretty autistic

>Sargon of Akkad
Knows his history and seems pretty rational overall desu

>Historia Civilis
Good, but I'd prefer it if he went into more detail, especially about the early republic and kingdom periods of Rome

>History Buffs
>Shadiversity
Never heard of em

Would propose THFE Productions was added to that list
youtube.com/user/THFEProductions

>Sargon
>rational

Haven't seen too many of his videos, going from what I've seen so far. Where has he been irrational?

>great war
>this is modern war guy
He's alright, but I'd prefer more sources and the veganess truly comes through
>franz Ferdinand was a terrible man he hunted animals
>let's just ignore him being peace keeper and wanting to make a tri-monarchy

All he does is complain about feminists.

I'm speaking about his historical stuff. His video on slavery was great, and he also has some decent vids on ancient Greek and Mesopotamian people iirc

>Knows his history
Correct
>and seems pretty rational overall desu
He isn't though, he's actually pretty awful and a hypocrite as well. He keeps complaining about progressives using "muh feels" instead of arguments yet he does the same in debates. Speaking of, lately he's been been in debates with libertarians but for some reason only anarcho-capitalists and yet he speaks with such an authority on libertarianism as if he himself is a libertarian.

>SARGON of Akkad
>SARGON of cuckkad
>quadroon of cuckkad
>quadroon of 'you don't know what it's like being poor so stop making laws on it' fame
>sargon of 'give me child porn to piss of the alt right' fame
>sargon 'i have racist fans WTF do I do, oh yeah post interracial gay porn' of Akkad
>sargon 'gamergate is dead gamergate doesn't have to be your audience' of Akkad
>sargon of Semitic king
>sargon 'I'm gonna fuck with everyone google search for 20 years' of Akkad
>Sargon of 'ethics in gaming journalism but not for my kickstarter' Akkad
>sargon 'ruiner of the British accent' of Akkad
>sargon 'diablo 3 ripped off me' of Akkad
>sargon of 'I'll use sargon's wife's grandson mask as my pp' of Akkad
>sargon 'raising your wife's son doesn't make you a cuck' of Akkad
>sargon 'I'm cucking him' of Akkad
You may say it's ad hominems but I shall not be talked down by such a pleb who doesn't know how to live on minimum wage when the death rate for the poor is lower than ever

>Knows his history and seems pretty rational overall desu
>you don't know what it's like being poor if you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth

Sargon used to make historical videos but calling SJWs on Tumblr pays his bills.

Varg Vikernes, he's 100% historically accurate

Also Sargon spent his youth as a degenerate stoner leeching off government welfare and wasting his time playing video games and smoking pot. I guess he's better now since he has a family (even though he's a cuck) and manages to make his own money.

Real Crusades History produces many videos with sources that are from the era. My only problem is his unapolegetic defence of the sack of Constantinople.

I'm sorry Varg, I was watching porn

>captcha is CIVIC

>Lindybeige
Why is he a Veeky Forums meme?

>unapolegetic defence of the sack of Constantinople.
What is his justification? The massacre of the Latins some years ago? I saw some of his videos and he says it was a horrible event but at the point the Angeloi had already fucked up the Empire.

He's a meme outside Veeky Forums?

He views the Byzantines as tricksters and cowards unlike his brave, noble and strong crusaders that Anna Komnenus would totally have fucked. But I'm just writing hyperbole.

Where he reads ancient texts.

rather than actually demonstrating any knowledge of history

>Veeky Forums approved youtube historians

>"""historians"""

Thats close enough i'd say,considering you can just read up about the topic you are interested in.its not STEM.

b-but he has a master in history,how can he be worse than lindy who doesnt even have a degre in that field?!

It's pretty disappointing how shit Veeky Forums is, even though I wasn't expecting much better.

It's just filled with faggots who've never read a book and think they're experts because they watched a youtube video or played Victoria 2. The amount of nationalistic wankery is also horrible if at times hilarious.

reminder that Lindybeige claims:

>no one used swords, axes
>no one used horses
>no one used throwing knives
>no one used double strap arm shields
>no one used scythes
>no one used mail coifs
>no one used torches
>Pikemen didn't fight each other
>no one spoke French during the French revolution
>no one spoke Latin during the Roman Republic
>battle of Zama didn't happen
>Romans carried one pilum
>Vikings weren't real
>berserkers weren't real
>climate change isn't real
>stagnant social mobility isn't real
>castles were defended by three soldiers
>butted mail is better than riveted mail
>operation market garden was a success
>Napoleon was literally Hitler
>The Churchill was the best tank in WWII

>>climate change isn't real
he's right

You should add
>The English won the Hundreds Years' War

our lad

bahahahahahahahah BAHAHAHAHAHAHAH BAAAAHAAHAHHAHAHAHA

holy shit

what video?

Holy fuck I had no idea he was behind the meme.

Real Crusades History is actually the best history channel about an specific period out there.

Meme? What meme are you talking about?

reminder that Lindybeige claims:

>no one used swords, axes
>no one used horses
>no one used throwing knives
>no one used double strap arm shields
>no one used scythes
>no one used mail coifs
>no one used torches
>Pikemen didn't fight each other
>no one spoke French during the French revolution
>no one spoke Latin during the Roman Republic
>battle of Zama didn't happen
>Romans carried one pilum
>Vikings weren't real
>berserkers weren't real
>climate change isn't real
>stagnant social mobility isn't real
>castles were defended by three soldiers
>butted mail is better than riveted mail
>operation market garden was a success
>Napoleon was literally Hitler
>The Churchill was the best tank in WWII
>The English won the Hundreds Years' War

No one cares about your stale pasta.

now we have 2 sources
that's 2x the proof
if we assume this claim had a 50/50 chance of being true (it is either true or false), then now it's 100/50
100/50 = 2
2 = 200%

this post is 200% correct

not an argument

This pasta is actually starting to represent Lindybeige more accurately as they add more claims. A few months ago when it started only a few of them were true and the rest were over exaggerations and lies. Now the last four claims as well as some others are actually correct Lloyd totally believes said claims

what surprises me the most is that some retards here are still defending that clown

That he gets this many le upboats while being objectively wrong about a well known fact is what disturbs me the most