Tfw to smart for non-keynesian economics

>tfw to smart for non-keynesian economics
Why include the capital investment on plant maintenance and equipment in 'investment' and not part of the 'user cost' in relation to aggregate supply plebs?

>you guys are too dumb to spend your own money, give me all the money i need to fix your lifes, 100% not stealing anything

>market failures don't exist

At least you get fucked by your own mistakes or just bad luck. Who the fuck thought it was a good idea to increasingly concentrate the money of already poor people in the hands of politicians?

How about some non-bias studying? Keynesian economics made a small crisis become the crash of 29.

>Keynesian economics made a small crisis become the crash of 29
>implying WW2 wasn't a form of Keynesian stimulus
>implying it didn't work wonders
>implying Japan and Germany didn't also use Keynesian economics to grow dramatically and punch above their weight against the Europeans
>implying the 30s and 40s didn't generally BTFO neoclassical economics
>implying the late 00s didn't do it again when the Chinese Keynes'd their recession to death and the Europoors were too chickenshit to pass stimulus

>Great Depression was caused by Keynesian economics
This is some of the biggest retcon anachronisms I ever heard. It's like saying Hitler lost Germany the WW1.

if Keynesian economics has been applied for a long time, why do they keep blaming liberalism(the real one) for the eventual failure?

If Keynesian economics is so good, why is Latin America, where it has been extremely influential, so bad?

>implying Japan and Germany didn't also use Keynesian economics to grow dramatically and punch above their weight against the Europeans
>implying the late 00s didn't do it again when the Chinese Keynes'd their recession to death and the Europoors were too chickenshit to pass stimulus

You just went full retarded there. Fascist economics are not Keynesian economics.

And yes, you can say the Chink government is basically fascist.

>Venezuela
>Keynesian

Venezuela annexed all Latin America?

>Hitler
>fascist
Back to revleft

depreciation and amortization

>implying it didn't work wonders

It didn't. World War II raised U.S. defense expenditures by $540 billion (1996 dollars) per year at the peak in 1943-44, amounting to 44% of real GDP. The war raised real GDP by $430 billion per year in 1943-44. Thus, the multiplier was 0.8 (430/540).

>implying the 30s and 40s didn't generally BTFO neoclassical economics

There is no such thing as "neoclassical economics"

Actually, Venezuela has been a Keynessian paradise since 1945. Check out Toro Hardy analysis on this.
t. Venezuelan

>that time when Joseph Stiglitz praised Hugo Chavez

Which is just V. It's still part of the aggregate supply curve though, not investments.

Keynesian economics, which developed its major terms, postulates, and equations in The General Theory which was published after the Great Depression somehow caused the Great Depression?

You are a fuckin twat I tell u wat m8

What are you talking about. The three main schools in the first half of the 20th century were Keynesian Austrian and Neoclassical.

What was Irving Fisher

>implying the saving can ever be over or under the investment
Irving Fisher > John Keynes for this very reason

>Keynesian economics made a small crisis become the crash of 29.
Veeky Forums

>There is no such thing as "neoclassical economics"

Dude, stop with the autism

>>Keynesian economics made a small crisis become the crash of 29

What the fuck do you mean by this nonsense bullshit?

>>Keynesian economics made a small crisis become the crash of 29

What the fuck do you mean by this nonsense bullshit?

Now project the mentality of a savage, who can grasp nothing but the concretes of the immediate moment, and who finds himself transported into the midst of a modern, industrial civilization. If he is an intelligent savage, he will acquire a smattering of knowledge, but there are two concepts he will not be able to grasp: “credit” and “market.”

He observes that people get food, clothes, and all sorts of objects simply by presenting pieces of paper called checks—and he observes that skyscrapers and gigantic factories spring out of the ground at the command of very rich men, whose bookkeepers keep switching magic figures from the ledgers of one to those of another and another and another. This seems to be done faster than he can follow, so he concludes that speed is the secret of the magic power of paper—and that everyone will work and produce and prosper, so long as those checks are passed from hand to hand fast enough. If that savage breaks into print with his discovery, he will find that he has been anticipated by John Maynard Keynes.

cause the dog ate my meta homework book

>not posting the author with the quote

God... a being whose only definition is that he is beyond man's power to conceive.

Indeed.

Man you are jealous of me

For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:

Keynes published his general theory in 36, 7 years after the crash

And you are a jealous man!

>tfw too smart for non-ecological economics
Why would you measure the artificial capital valued by supply and demand and not measure the natural capital valued by objective science that it is created from?
Why plebs, why?

I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.

>raise minimal salary and government aid to boost demand that will inevitably cause a rise in production and taxes money
>with their newfound money people buy shit they actually want, electronics made in asia
>marginal increase in national production at the cost of additional debt for the state and laying off of the unskilled workers that had their salary raised without significant rise in production
what's the next step in your master plan?