What country is the worst at war?

What country is the worst at war?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War
youtube.com/watch?v=sggJWiqdICA
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Germans seem to keep getting BTFO

How long ago had the last thread fallen off the board before you made this one?

The correct answer is any 20th-21st century Arab country.

I nominate Libya.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War

The Amerindians were completely rekt.

*pic unrelated*

Italy post Roman Empire.

Italians in WW2

liberland

France is actually really good, Louis XIV, Napoleon, WW1 were they held off a massive and populous Germany. WW2 is a blemish, but it by no means invalidates a strong military tradition.

I nominate Italy, fucking weaklings

not a real country

not even real people

In the past 30 years or so it must be either the US or UK. Militarily powerful & reasonably adept on the field but consistently defeated and humiliated in terms of achievement.

pretty sure germany is the only country to have lost all the wars it's fought so probably them

italy was also an embarassement

Get out.

The UK.

>mfw Americans and British would've surrendered even faster if they were in France's position during WWII
>mfw Americans think they're known for being tough guys
>mfw Americans think they were super soldiers during WWII

I name Argentina

Depends on if you count the Franco-Prussian war as Germany or not.

Regardless, Italy is the bigger embarrassment no matter what

Italy won WWI and the second half of WWII

>and the second half of WWII
Sorry mate but you don't win half a war

Americans and Brits wouldn't have been dumb enough to forget that Belguim would be unable to stop or slow down a German armored push.

italian diplomacy

Austria

youtube.com/watch?v=sggJWiqdICA

when stacking up wins/losses for major wars between the European powers, France and Italy sit at a 60-61% win rate, while Austria sits at an even 50%

WW1- won by being backstabbing assholes
WW2- did jack shit and lost

You guys all want to talk like the obvious but spwhy not look at RUSSIA?

I mean we are talking about having its influence spread across the globe now only reduced to one of its smallest sizes in the past 300 years. Sure they are fuckin badass. But...

>look at their involvement in afgan
>loss of every satilite nation they had
>look at Russian Empire under Zhar
>look at fall of Berlin Wall
>look at poverty stricken Russia
>look closet homosexual President Putin

The countries that don't exist anymore.

This seems like a weird way of calculating a win rate, because it weighs every single war the same. The French-Tahiti War is equally as great a victory as the Battle of France is a defeat by his logic. Furthermore how would you do this for e.g. the USA? Count every single Indian War as a separate war and weight them the same as World War II?

Well in factual matters, the BEF (brits) certainly did forget it. And the Americans always wait until everything is settled to engage to avoid surprises.

>>mfw Americans think they were super soldiers during WWII

The number don't lie Ouiboo. We absolutely wrecked the Germans under an enormous barrage of artillery and bombers.

[spoiler]Granted we had a lot more time to prepare than the French and a lot of examples to learn from.[/spoiler]

>cropping the result

German/Anglo detected

no space on phone screenshot mang

war of the league of cambrai

don't trust italians is the moral of the story

ofc the french won though

Australia?
>Gallipoli
>Emus
>Rabbits
>Cane Toads

How do the French even make this list considering overall historical context?
>Invading Normans defeat and subjugate Brits
>Napoloeon's massive campaigns and victories in Egypt and all over Europe
>Knights of St. john at Malta Siege were mostly French and commanded by Frechman Jean de Valette
>Brutal fighting in WW 1 Trenches
>Brutal fighting in Algeria, which the De Gaulle pulled out from under the army and resulted in an attempted coup and then the disbanding of the Foreign Legion Parachute Regiment

for a number of reasons, the French were not reading for WW 2 and the Maginot Line was a disaster that never even considered the idea of Blitzkrieg. Should that then taint their entire military history since Charles Martel, tours and the battle that saved European Christendom?

>reading
*ready. I should probably quite writing, up all night working on something and now too tired to fall asleep but you get the idea.

>Kokoda
>Buna-Gona
>Borneo
>Tobruk
>El Alamein
>Kapyong
>Long Tan

Nah.

Italy was actually much worse.

they won nonetheless

tell me a nigger that got more btfo'd then the australian australoids to engg

the answer seems to be japan, more specifically the jomons

America is young, so american like to pretend the two millenias before didn't matter.
Of course their degenerate hollywoodian mass-"culture" doesn't help

> "What country is the worst at war?"
> Post the flag of France
> Logic

autism level: Veeky Forums

ITT : OP (who is secretly french) says France sucks at war so he can feel better when everyone gives proof of the contrary.

kys

t.french

The Vatican

You're underestimating the butthurt of anglos senpai

It is funny, the thing I thing the US was best at in the past was picking their spots. Swoop in at the right time. Now, there is 0 restraint, too long being a virtually unopposed power, no more finesse.

>>Knights of St. john at Malta Siege were mostly French and commanded by Frechman Jean de Valette

source

What source do you need cretin?
Just look at the commanders in the Great Siege of Malta, they're all French
The Order of Malta itself is a branch of the Hospitallers, a French crusading order

Italy

Germany and Austria.