>brahim, was the first to give an idea to the medieval bloodbath that was India during Muslim rule, when he declared that over 400 million Hindus got slaughtered during Muslim invasion and occupation of India. Survivors got enslaved and castrated. India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion.
themuslimissue.wordpress.com
Thoughts Veeky Forums ?
It was a war of self defense. Jihad is holy war in self defense.
PS make sure you your jizya
>India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion.
Amusing, considering that's more than the estimated world population at the time.
This and another point proving that this is bullshit is that only 15% of the Indians are actually Muslims.
Closer to 20 and you're leaving out Pakistan and Bangladesh. Add their populations and it's closer to 50-50.
What a shoah.
Because most went to Pakistan or Bangladesh
15 according to Wiki. And Bangladesh + Pakistan have about 400 million people together.
the muslims ruled over delhi, as their capital, for 800 years. if what you scum claim was true, then that whole city and all of its surrounding areas would be 100% muslim. infact islam would reach highest concentration in delhi and then lower in concentration in proportion to the distance from delhi. the reality is the exact opposite. in this imaginary line on a map, called india, the farthest east and the farthest west from delhi is where the largest concentration of muslims.
and there was no such thing as "india" to invade for the muslims. the nation state is a western european created entity. why would it exist 8000 miles away in south of asian landmas. india is as much a nation as the equator.
Poo in Loo History student here and this article is bullshit.
This article is a result of historic appropriation by the current Indian Political state.
Indians were never slaughtered by Muslims in Medieval ages. I mean there were wars, Indian hindu kings lost, army men died. But that's all.
Mughals came here as rulers. Not as destroyers. They developed India and stayed here as it was their own land. Trust me on this as I am not even muslim.
The more destruction is caused by the people who came after Muslims and before the British.
Our own people, hindu rulers such as Peshwas.
They reintroduced Caste systems. Killed our own people. Killed a lot of men in the invasion of Bengal. Denied Education to the 80% of population.
These things you won't find on 'websites'.
Read some books.
Nice madrassa education, muzzies.
Go read an actual history book instead of beleiving in your madrassa propaganda.
Great arguments
>400 million Hindus got slaughtered during Muslim invasion and occupation of India
ok, pajeet, whatever you say
I'm genuinely asking, i'm curious
400 million people would be the entire population of the world at the time of the Mughal conquests
I don't know about the population numbers but there's no way in hell you can deny India was a complete bloodbath.
Have you seen how hard Muslims wage war against Muslims of other denominations? How they wage war against Christians, and Jews? They might hate them, but they consider them as misguided believers.
Do you really think they would have ANY mercy for the very litteral "Idol Worshippers"?
Stop being racist against Islam, you Islamaphobe.
>400 million
OY VEY IT'S ANUDDA SHOAH
en.wikipedia.org
>1,000 AD - 400 million estimated WORLD POPULATION
t. JNU Marxist "Historian"
The funny thing is that your whitewashing of Muslim rule in India is the same as those who whitewash Western colonialism in Americas and Africa, but Indian Muslims vote for the Congress, so whitewashing their crimes is progressive. Hypocrites.
>Muslim medieval chroniclers: "We entered the infidel city, slaughtered them all them robbed their temples".
>Indian Marxist "Historian": "Here we see the chronicler using poetic license, actually they were openly received by the peoples of the city as proto-socialist from the evils of right-wing Hindu nationalist rule, then the property of the temple was expropriated and distributed according to the bureaucracy in a taste of what later would come under the rule of the great enlightened Nehru, peace be upon him"
That's all that crapworthy """"history post"""" deserved.
It implies there were no ghaznis, no gjiris, no Ahmad shah abdalis, no Timur lanes, no aurangazebs, no baburs and this is just from the top of the head. Pretty sure there were dozens of other mudslime barbarians who came here and destroyed shit.
>themuslimissue
Clearly an objective, unbiased source.
>when /pol/ makes attempts at learning history
wew
It is better to be looted by the Gazani than being looted and destroyed by your own people.
Well you people won't know this because this isn't taught in your RSS/ISIS Shakhas.
>It is better to be looted by the Gazani than being looted and destroyed by your own people.
t.cucked mudslime who thinks he is the progeny of Ghazni
>Well you people won't know this because this isn't taught in your RSS Shakhas.
No what is not taught in indian history curriculum is the absolute bloodbath by the muslim invaders for the fear of offending the muslims. Guess "it's better to be plundered by Ghazni" is what they teach in those madarsahs. Fucking shit. If its so bad in India why the hell do these people not fuck off to pakistan which was created for them especially. BAKA.
Aurangazeb accoring to Mughal Records
The second sounds like a sensible position that's been exaggerated beyond its intent. It's the same kind of reading we do for studying the Crusades, for example when it was claimed the Latins waded in blood up to their ankles despite a large number of refugees and civilians still alive long after the conquest.
