If guns beat swords and nukes beat guns, then what beats nukes?

If guns beat swords and nukes beat guns, then what beats nukes?

Other urls found in this thread:

masteroforion.gamepedia.com/Ship_weapons
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Hydrogen bombs

By AOE logic, it would be swords

Missile interception systems

memes

KRAKATIT

Are still nuclear bombs

Orbital bombardment

so far nothing,natural disasters would beat them but they arent controlled weapons.

Niggers.

dank memes

katanas

You really thought this thread out and put an amazing amount of effort into it. Thanks. I enjoyed reading it. Really great stuff.

Guns > Swords
Nukes > Guns
In a proper RPS, every option must defeat only one (1) other option, so:
Swords > Nukes

Moar Nukes

This post.

Social and demographic warfare

Mustafa Kamal

>what beats nukes?

METAL GEAR!!!

Pommel.

Cockroaches

Refugees

Satelite ray guns.

>Can shoot out nukes
>Can destroy nuke launch platforms

...

and whats a weapon to surpass the metal gear?

ABM Sprint

still the most impressive rocket ever built

Fusion bombs, then anti-matter bombs, then neutronium bomb. For further details please check out: masteroforion.gamepedia.com/Ship_weapons

The humble house hammer

anti-ballistic missiles, railguns, directed energy weapons, maybe EMP?

>metal gear beats nukes
>mfw there is a weapon to surpass metal gear
im scraed

It only takes one man.

diplomacy, or rather you could say nukes beat themselves since nobody is prepared to actually use them

the development of nuclear weapons has given us an unprecedented era of (relative) global peace

Yet

[spoiler]love[/spoiler]

Empathy

gotta go fast

The Evangelion

The Kwisatz Haderach

time travel

Nuclear disarmament

subversive weather and tectonic equipment

Relativistic Kinetic Kill Vehicles (RKKV)

Its just a fast space ship you throw at people.

They are the interstellar MAD weapons.

nothing can beat a nuke?

>maybe 2 nukes?

>memes.com

Is nuclear winter a legit thing?

I've heard some people say that it would happen and fuck over pretty much everyone, but I've heard some people say there wouldn't be enough firestorms and plenty of people would have a chance of survival.

This is assuming a large scale nuclear war.

I seriously doubt it would be mutual destruction. The Russians might get a few nukes off but we'd take them out before they could respond with their completely overmatched intelligence and logistics and utterly inferior armed forces in both resources and technology. Billions would die, but not everyone.

The Jewish diaspora

Kinetic impact weapons dropped from space

Same destruction
No radiation
Able to easily penetrate nuclear silos

Read up on Krakatoa and the Year Without Summer.

Both the USA and Russia would cease to exist.

hahah are you serious?