Did he do nothing wrong?

Did he do nothing wrong?

>an Imperial Grand Admiral
>nothing wrong

Iran was the ninth richest country in the world under him, with a dwelling middle class and rights with women in line with or even beyond contemporary western nations.

Compare that to now.

his father was better

Did nothing wrong? He let a bunch of towel heads over throw him instead of killing them all!

Seriously, he ran away like a fucking dog.

He was just another US puppet tyrant.

Most Iranians were poor and but conservative (and still are). The pictures you see on Iranian women in the 1970s, were the urban elite who don't represent the majority.

I'm drawing a pretty strong parallel between Khomeini and Trump to tell you the truth lads

Really made me think

Trump doesn't want to start a religious dictatorship.

Does /pol/ support this guy?

>expanded rights to women and minorities
>expanded trade
>liberalized economy
>sensible economic policy

Nah

No, because the Ayatollah is typically credited as the forefront of anti-Zionism so anything he opposes is naturally bad, although /pol/'s views of these sorts of things are beginning to shift.

this. his father was extremely based. would've made iran into a secular country if not for the (((eternal anglo))) ousting him from power for wanting to remain neutral in ww2

/pol/ is typically pro-Iran (past and present) from what I've seen

Yes, he is basically sandnigger Pinochet.

The regressive left has a short memory. The Shah was hated by leftist "intellectuals", and when he was deposed leftists worldwide rejoiced and celebrated the Ayatollah as some kind of muslim socialist.

Replace religion with nationalism and it's the same thing.

Replace nationalism with rye bread and parmesan and you have a sandwich.

rye bread and parmesan aren't ideologies.

Now I need a sandwich.

>Expanded rights to Minorities
>by Shitting on Anyone who wasn't persian

Shooting and torturing people,maybe?

Literally did nothing wrong. The Assad of the 1970s