Was he right?

Was he right?

Yes

No

Maybe

Could you repeat the question?

Did he really say that?

Way to fuck it up, man.

It was meant to be.

fucking redditors are raping the corpse of this board man

He certainly was.

Adultery makes men and women paranoid to start a marriage.

The immorality involved with pornography descends our society into hedonism.

It's all playing out too accurately.

most of these sources are cited from books without even a proper citation, just a link to the amazon page, how am I supposed to check the validity of that claim?

Pastor says that kids will be kids and its best to let them grow into adultery on their own

wtf? I hate fags now!

>men have bigger libidos
>surprised when you remove women from the equation you end up with more sexual partners and sex in general because guys just want to fuck

Mind boggling stuff.

Thanks for the pic. Bless you user.

>men have bigger libidos
Nice stand-up comedy meme. The reason gay men have more sex is there a sexual deviants to begin with

*they are
speak-to-text

You can't be this delusional. It's a biological fact, promiscuity in males is an innate instinct, you fucking retard.

>a biological fact
Did you pour over the data yourself or are you just parroting bullshit from a community of "scientists" who change 90% of their world view on a yearly basis

Ah yes, those gosh darn (((scientists))), amrite?

Those one's in particular, yes. at least they know they don't have all the answers, but for some reason you think they do.

Except the fact that 99% of mammalian males, primates included, ensure that their genes get passed on by having as many mates as it is possible, and in some cases they even fight with other males in order to secure a greater amount of females for themselves. This isn't some fringe science theory that's up for debate, it's something that people were aware since the fucking dawn of time by simple observation.

Your pastor is probably a closeted fag.

My pastor got kicked out of our church for decrying homosexuality and promiscuity.

Yes

No he wasn't. All sorts of decadent behavior has occured in every civilization you can name from the very beginning of human civilizations. His assertions are the prejudices of his time, place and religion and are no more worthy of serious consideration then the rants of tiresome religious zealots on this board.

dips bedora :---DDDD

>Does Hedonism lead a civilization to its grave

Yes.

then explain rome, they didn't fall when they were ultra hedonists

they only fell after they reined that shit in

Especially if your rival or neighbour is a hungry wolf.

>they were ultra hedonists

You're referring to the Patricians. the Plebs (including the low ranking soldiers) were always on the tips of their fingers. And even the hedonist patricians knew when playtime was over (see Caesar, Augustus, Marcus antonius, Pompey, etc)

tips of their toes* not fingers. Stupid me.

What? a prostitute in Rome costed about as much as a cheap glass of wine

> a prostitute in Rome costed about as much as a cheap glass of wine?

Gonna need a citation for that.

Plus, you know what hedonism is? It's devoting the entirety of your life to quelling your desires, especially the bodily ones. Getting fucked by a prostitute isn't that harmful unless you literally devote the entirety of your time to it. So far I don't know anything of any civilization that entered hedonism in its textbook definition form, but if any culture ends up doing it then their demise is only a matter of someone else deciding that they're weak enough to be enslaved.

>who change 90% of their world view on a yearly basis
"When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"

These are true statements

Overtime the plebs got more religious and over time the government got more socially repressive. The "degeneracy" comes from the idle children of aristocrats who never worked a day in their lives and have the money, power, and influence to wallow in jaded excess.

yes, there were extremely desperate $2 hookers trying to keep their children from starving, if she hadn't already been in chains and sold to the brothel.

>"When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"

He uses Alternative Facts anyway so it doesn't matter.

It's an internet quote, what do you think? Ofcourse he did

>no specific mention of female-to-male transsexuals
It feels good to have your fetish justified

>Muslim right
>Ever

is that you ken?

Do you know a nation that ever had nudity or adultery being common?

>between 24% and 90%

Stopped reading there. People take this seriously? kek

Sharia law when?

>haruhi
>a tranny

>nation
B-BUT NATIONS ARE A 20TH CENTURY CONSTRUCT!

Seriously, anybody knows if there was an arabic word for nation at that time?

>thinking tamaki's love did anything but make her want a flat chest and a testosterone injected clit

>43% of gay men have over 500 partners

how the fuck am i still a single lonely virg

SALADIN WAS TURKISH YOU FUCK

No he's a kurd

If the quote is real my guess would be he used the word "ummah".