21st century - Century of China

21st century - Century of China
20th century - Century of USA
19th century - Century of Britain
18th century - Century of France
17th century - Century of Spain
16th century - Century of Habsbourgs
15th century - Century of Italy

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tunmen
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Xicaowan
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Calais_(1558)
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>17th century - Century of Spain
wat

Shit no fuck i fucked it up

well fuck me

century of Germany when?

>16th century - Century of Habsbourgs
>17th century - Century of Spain
abloooblloobllluurrffpt

16th century was the ottoman century.

>century of france
They got btfo during the entire latter half

To the point where they imploded, beheaded their monarch and nobility, and created a state that's batshit even by our modern sensibilities, with innocent civilians and clergy being mass executed

Their accomplishment being they didn't totally fragment or get partitioned

13th and 14th century is Mongol?

Monarchist detected

le mongols xd +1

>21st - Century of China
meme

The 17th Century was the Dutch century. Spain was in decline already. The British got so arseblasted by the Dutch successes that they allied with FRANCE AND SPAIN to destroy them.

21st century - Century of China
20th century - Century of USA
19th century - Century of Britain
18th century - Century of Europe
17th century - Century of Evangelism
16th century - Century of Habsbourgs
15th century - Century of Italy
14th century - ???
13th century - Century of Mongols

>ethnic group, countries, continent, idea all on the same list
uh?

>Century of Evangelism

He's completely right and you're blasé calling him a monarchist thinking that's in any way an insult. Retard.

this desu senpai

>anyone but China/India relevant till 18th century

>GDP in a time with virtually no exchanges where wealth was not used in a productive way
wow man you sure showed those europeans

>was the Dutch century
t.Williem Van Bommel
The Dutch were never a dominant power

>GDP before globalism and industrial warfare
>Any relevance
Even Portugal was a bigger power than China in the XV century

>implying
china's growth is already slowing down and India's growth is even more unsustainable.

>Establish the biggest monopoly the world has ever seen
>Spain, France and England declare war, but never manage to destroy the country
>Fuck up the Anglo fleet by sailing up their most important river without any resistance
>Replace their king by a Dutch prince
>Finalize Spain's decline

17th century was the Mughals' century unless we're only counting countries that still exist.

>21st century - Century of China
fuck off, liu kang

Fucking cuckold never produced an heir though

>tfw the house of orange-nassau could've been sitting on the English throne for centuries to come

17th century was the Mughals' century when you count territorial expansion

>>Spain, France and England declare war, but never manage to destroy the country
Spain was slapping their dick on the Dutch until the French intervened.And then France in a couple of years destroyed all the Dutch influence
>>Fuck up the Anglo fleet by sailing up their most important river without any resistance
Still not their century
>>Replace their king by a Dutch prince
>>Finalize Spain's decline
The Dutch barely won any battle against Spain.Appart from Downs you can't claim that they finalized Spain's decline specially when they were about to get rolled if France hadn't intervened after Nördlingen

>talking about gdp
>not per capita

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tunmen
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Xicaowan

Yeah some skirmishes of a miniscule Portuguese fleet in the other side of the world against a huge Chinese fleet on their waters.Are you serious or just a butthurt chink canadian?

>>century of china
Not really likely.

Colonial naval powers were mainly few troops/ships conquests against native naked barbarians with spears.

It wasn't until the industrial era edge did they become powerful enough to push the Qingz and that was after the Qingz had been decadent after the widespread Opium epidemic problems of Qingz.

The statement "Portugal was a bigger power than China in XV century" bears no merit. Portugese didn't even have a standing army till late 16th century totaling no more than 8,000.

10th century: Century of the Eastern Roman Empire

Dunno m8
Pic related seems pretty impressive to me
More than anything Britain ever accomplished at least

>Replace their king by a Dutch prince
t-t-that was voluntarily, i swear. It was a revolution

they had Denmark on their side, its not really that impressive.

>19th century - Century of Britain
>18th century - Century of France
>17th century - Century of Spain
>16th century - Century of Habsbourgs
>15th century - Century of Italy
Shit opinions. Those entities exited in eras where powers equal & greater than them existed.

USA is the only correct one. And is only true since the 90s.

Not to mention Mysore

>DUDE, KILLING OFF ALL OUR ELITE, RICH, RULERS AND MONARCHS LMAO
>DUDE, BECOMING REPUBLIC RUN BY CRONY WEASELS WHO USED TO SUCK THE KING'S COCK, LMAO
Tyranny of populism

1350-1790 - The Chinese Centuries

>Posting a picture of České Budějovice
Btw i'm going there this month

21st century - Century of China
20th century - Century of USA
19th century - Century of Britain
18th century - Century of France
17th century - Century of Habsburgs
16th century - Century of France
15th century - Century of France

11th century: Century of the Normans
12th century: Century of the Crusaders

What's with the Europoors and their WE WUZ shit?

Face it, Europe was irrelevant before 15th century. The highlights are 15th century onward and 4th century backwards.

In between those are the Islamic Golden age and multiple Chinese Golden age.

>16th century - Century of France
>15th century - Century of France
*Loses Italian war*
*Goes bankrupt*
*Loses another Italian war*
*Loses against the English*
*King gets captured*
*Allies with the Ottomans*
*Allies with the protestants*
*Loses Italian war*
Wow those centuries must have certainly being pathetic if France was the dominant power.
Now fixing your shit list
>16th century - Century of Castille
>15th century - Century of Castille

>12th century: Century of the Crusaders
no
12th Century: Century of the HRE
11th Century: Century of the Byzantines
10th Century: Century of the Cordoba Caliphate
9th Century: Century of the Vikings

>Century of the Cordoba Caliphate
They were weak as fuck.

>*Loses against the English*

Only one that's wrong in your list
France was pretty bad in that era, but they still won all their wars against the English

>but they still won all their wars against the English
Didn't Henry cucked Francis out Of Calais?

they were economically and culturally powerful though. if were talking military i guess hre or byzantines

What is this

On the contrary
England had been allowed to retain Calais in the treaty ending the HYW, but they lost it soon after

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Calais_(1558)

>they were economically and culturally powerful
Yeah but certainly not economically and culturally more powerfull than Byzantium or the Abasies

>byzantines
Manzikert happened

I meant the battle of the spurs though

till the 1060s tho they were ok

L E P A N T O
E
P
A
N
T
O

>16th century - Century of Habsbourgs
Change for Spain, and we are good.

The first half was still the spanish golden age, i will give you that the second half of the 17th everything went to shit.

>tfw Westerners think China wants to be like the US

We just want to unify China and be at peace without foreigners trying to invade us. Is that too much to ask? America always tries to get the angry yapping Jap and Taiwan dogs to get at us. No more!

When did Alexios show up? 1100's?

Spain didn't ally with France and/or England vs the Dutch one single time.

It was either neutral or with the Dutch, depending on the specific war.

>no Mongols
>no Ottomans
>no Portugal

>no Portugal
>Portugal ever ever being an hegemon.
>When their standing army was smaller than the army of some Castillian nobles
t. Alberto Barbosa

They controlled the entire Indian Ocean.

That doesn't make them an hegemon when the duke of Cadiz almost conquered all the south of Portugal by himself

>21st century - Century of China
>Not India

5th, 6th century

I must agree with you about the Ottomans. Few centuries they were only super power in Europe

You're an idiot.

>China
>ruling anything

>15th century - Century of Italy
Pffft, they were a bunch of city-states. Replace them with Ottomans and it'd be a better list.

>what is cultural relevance

ottomans were literally the superpower in late 15th century and early 16th century.

the france-ottoman alliance was the NATO of their time

>China
Nice meme

21th century - China
20th century - USA
19th century - Britain
18th century - France
17th century - Sweden
16th century - Portugal/Spain
15th century - Ottomans
13th and 14th centuries - Mongols
12th century - Crusaders
11th century - Normans
10th century - Byzantines
9th century - Franks and Vikings
7th and 8th centuries - Arabs
6th century - Byzantines
5th century - Huns
1st to 4th centuries - Rome

>17th century - Sweden
t.Sven

>sweden
This delusion

17th century = Spain for the first half and France for the second half

>people trying to call the 21st century not even a quarter of a way through it

that's awesome, fuck off moralfag

Is this ironic

ow, the edge

Lmfao when a monarchist gets butthurt over freedom of speech

Get guillotiné, fuckboi

>21st century - Century of USA
>20th century - Century of USA
>19th century - Century of Britain
>18th century - Century of France
>17th century - Century of Spain
>16th century - Century of Habsbourgs
>15th century - Century of Italy

FTFY, bud

>17th century - Century of Spain

It was still Spain in the beginning, but then it was France. The turning point is generally considered to be the battle of Rocroi in 1643.

...

>21st century: The century of the Multicontinental arabic caliphate
Or
>21st century: Century of worldwide civil wars

21st century - Century of Jews

what is this based off? rising powers? in that case, Spain should be 16th, France 15th, and Dutch 17th

21st century - Century of USA (and Britain)
20th century - Century of USA (and Britain, no mostly Britain, really. you know what never mind, the century of Britain)
19th century - Century of Britain
18th century - Century of Britain
17th century - Century of Britain
16th century - Century of the feudal states in Britain
15th century - Century of the feudal states īn Britain

>17th century - Century of Britain
wrong. absolutely wrong.
answer, like the other guy said before, was officially Spain in the beginning and France at the end. But in reality France was the only country to "win" the thirty years' war. Richelieu's war effort was well funded and well fought. On the other hand, it became increasingly clear in the first decade of the 17th century that Spain was bankrupted. iirc it defaulted one or two times in this span of time alone. Perhaps, though, we can call the early half of the century the period of Dutch mercantile and naval supremacy which only got displaced by the anglo-dutch war of the 1550s and Louis XIV's near-successful invasion on the Netherlands in 1660 or so. Britain did not become a power until the 9 years' war in the 1690s, when the Glorious Revolution (i.e. ascension of a Dutch king to the throne) forced it to participate in European affairs seriously for the first time in nearly a century. As for the 18th century, for all those who say its was the French century are wrong. It's fair to say that Britain and France shared the century duking it out on the continent and around the world. France (though this has been contested by some) was the cultural center of Europe. But people looked even more admiringly at the productiveness of the anglos, their prosperous agricultural and mercantile pursuits, their seeming lack of rigid social hierarchy and stable constitutional monarchy. Britain was the one that withstood the huge financial burdens of 18th century warfare. France, as one poster here already explained, couldn't; France's imminent fiscal insolvency in the 1780s was probably the powder keg that exploded into the French Revolution. Britain financed its wars more effectively with a better tax system paid into by willing subjects (though there was plenty of grumbling about it) and with superior financial institutions and therefore leading to way lower interest on its debt than the continental powers.

woops meant for this guy

China is over due for a massive civil war.

The US is more likely to have one

>there will never be second taiping uprising where someone claims to be hong xiuquan and jesus' brother and the han must overthrow godless western educated barbarians

5th century - Century of France (obvious)
6th century - Century of France (obvious)
7th century - Century of France (obvious)
8th century - Century of France (obvious)
9th century - Century of France (Charlemagne, obvious)
10th century - Century of France (Cluny and feudalism)
11th century - Century of France (Norman Conquest and Crusades)
12th century - Century of France (Gothic)
13th century - Century of France (obvious)
14th century - Century of France (obvious)
15th century - Century of France (Joan of Arc to Italian Wars)
16th century - Century of France (crushing Habsburgs and making Renaissance less shit)
17th century - Century of France (obvious)
18th century - Century of France (obvious)
19th century - Century of France (Napoleon to Belle Epoque)
20th century - Century of France (Postmodernism)
21th century - Century of France (France will rise again)

in my fair and balanced opinion.

>there will never be

Hmm

>12th century - Crusaders

>only successful crusade was in 1097, all the others (in the 12th century) were complete failures

jesus dude

11th century it's normans and turks

>only successful crusade was in 1097, all the others (in the 12th century) were complete failures
Wrong. Stop lying.

How?

>It's fair to say that Britain and France shared the century
t.John Smith