Oversaw explosive rise in Iraqi economy in the 80s

>taking what I said as declraring war

but, yes, they should take every murderous dictator out

Irrelevant to the fact he deserved what he got.

Middle-East countries seem to be either

> Fascist rule by force, police abductions, corruption and limited freedoms

Or

> Islamist rule of force, less corruption, extremely limited freedoms, jihadi abductions, continous civil war

I think most would prefer the first. Iraqis, Libyans and Egyptians are crying for the days of their dictators who held an iron grip and kept the peace

>>secular
>>fought Jihad against Shia heretics
How are these compatible?

Egypt is a secular nation now.

They had a legit revolution and threw the fascist "Muslim Brotherhood" out. Morsi is in jail. Ofcourse the western media spinned this as a "military coup" and did not show you the millions of Egyptians cheering in the streets.

>killed thousands of his own people
>"b-b-but kurds aren't iraqis, WE WAZ KURDISTAN"

lol fucking k*rds

>secular

no its anti-islamist

Egypt will never be secular, its official state religion is islam and it has sharia courts and a bunch of other bullshit religious rules for muslims and christians. Not necessarily thats a bad thing if it keeps the balance and keeps things from falling apart, but no arab country will be "secular" in the western sense, the best we can hope for is that it will be anti-islamist and provide a degree of religious freedom to its religious minorities.

Also, my dad told me that Morsi was planning to give the Sinai to israel so that israel will transport all its palestinians to the sinai and the sinai will be the new "palestinian state". not sure how true this is.

>secular
Yeah, "secularists" commission a Koran written in human blood; and continue a brutal socio-religious regime where the Sunni minority rules over the Shia majority through violence and disenfranchisement.

Talk about a 'blood libel'.

That'll never happen. Politicians only like to start wars if it benefits them or their buddies in Wall Street.

Morsi was democratically elected.

That's kinda the point was making. Arab countries are either non-democratic, in which case they can sometimes function, or they're democratic, in which case they turn into theocratic shitholes

>egypt is crippled by severe food and fuel shortages
>military overthrows muslim brotherhood
>the shortages magically stop the very next day
hmmm

Libya, Egypt and Syria all suffered from the same CIA destabilization techniques during the "Arab Spring".

It's the same way the CIA operated in Latin America, except this time with social media and mass propaganda. The outcome of the destabilization campaign was different for each country however.

>Libya
Operation succesful. Turned into a complete shithole, once one of the greatest African nations with good living conditions. Now ruled by militant gangs, a failed state.

>Egypt
Operation backfired. The west got their puppet Morsi, but the Egyptians became aware of what had happened and had a second (real this time, not orchestrated) revolution to overthrow the western puppet and have a legit leader that represents the interests of the country.

>Syria
Operation failed. The Syrian people were well aware of the agenda conspired against them. The state did not fall, and people resist terrorism and death squads. Even though the country is technically destabilized through a brutal war, the people refuse to bend over to NATO and the Saudi/Qatar.

One worked, one worked for a little while, the other failed.

The good news is that the Syrian army and Hezbollah has gotten alot of combat experience, which is bad news for Pissrael.

t. sandnigger

Assad sure took down Obama by having him serve out the maximum amount of terms he possibly could have

Obama's boys (Al-Qaeda and IS) are getting slaughtered aswell, so that's extra insult to injury.

>Anti-Shia

If he were Anti-Sunni he'd have been a top tier lad.

At least he kept those apes in check.

>K*rds and Sh*as
>his own people

looks like an economist cartoon

Didn't know scatman john was an Iraqi

go to bed Dahnald.

during the 90's, there was a massive rise in (((political islam))) throughout the middle east in the aftermath of the gulf war and fall of the soviet union. Iraqi Baathist movements and the PLO became overshadowed by Hamas and Saudi wahhabism, which continues into the present day. Saddam was well aware of the increasing islamic trend so he made some cosmetic changes like placing "allahu ackbar" on the flag, building a bunch of new mosques, and the qoran thing, like you mentioned.

Its funny though, when people say he persecuted shia, what they really meant is he persecuted pro-iranian shi'ite islamist parties. For ordinary shi'ite iraqis, saddam was the best leader.

All the Shi'ite politicians you see nowadays, the only reason they were able to attend a university in the first place was thanks to saddam's education system. He gave them economic opportunities that allowed shitbrained marsh arabs to become literate for the first time in their history and attend college for the first times. For the first time Baghdad had a significant shi'ite population under his rule thanks to all the work opportunities he created for poorer arabs from the south to immigrate to baghdad and work.

Saddam educated the poor shi'ites and gave them economic opportunities for the first time in their history, and they thanked him by licking irans boots and trying to overthrow him to get "muh wilayat al faqih"

>>secular
>>fought Jihad
Okaaaay...

What if they are murderous democratically elected liberals?

>Egyptians are crying for the days of their dictators who held an iron grip

you mean like the one they have right now?

>Egypt is a secular nation now.
Kek

>Morsi was democratically elected.
Kekkkkkkkk

>wasn't a military coup
HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

if he wasn't anti assad he would have made a coup d'état. Same thing with Harper and Sarkozy.

t. trumpet

t. alex jones

Are you sure that there's less corruption in clero-fascist ME countries than in secular fascist ME countries?
Or is it just harder to see?

Shias are objectively better than S*nnis though

It's the opposite.

Literally every country on the planet with a substantial Shiite population has experienced some form of chimpening directly related to them.

Oman is a peaceful benevolent dictatorship. Jordan has a similar government and has remarkably managed to stay relatively peaceful despite being a 1/3 refugee and surrounded by Iraq, Syria and Israel.

Tunisia and Israel are proper democracies.

>Shia heretics

Said the filthy sunni

>secular
>fought Jihad
Uhhh...

>Iran has more culture in the tip of its pinky than the rest of the Sunni world combined

really makes you think

Shia >>>>>>>> Sunni
Shia Batiniyya > Shia
Alevi > Shia Batiniyya
t. Alevi shill

p.s. won't Mr. Trump direct some of his love to Erdogan?

He's like Gadaffi or Assad or any other leader of a shit hole nation in that he's the best of a bad lot because the other options are infinitely worse.

I think you got it mixed up. How many Shia country attacked the West after 2000? How many terrorists are Sunni? As a European its easy to decide, the one that isn't try to kill me

this does not reduce the validity of their statements shill

Is there literally a less successful ideology than pan-arabism?

Why?

youtube.com/watch?v=KC7-Q1dPa_c

bump

It's literally the opposite

it is, its from a few years ago

That never happened

>Egypt is a secular nation now.

Egypt is literally ruled by the army. It is in defacto red alert mode for years.

It's pretty obvious that ha was a murderous tyrant.