Agree or disagree?

>Racism is tool used by capitalists and fascists to attain their goal of power and protection for the capitalist class.

Marx was a racist. Racism is natural

Racism is perpetuated by the left to further their narrative

I do believe that identity politics need to fuck off and die. They get a wholly disproportionate amount of attention, while they real issues like the economy, the environment and social policy get forgotten.

I see far more racism emanating from the extreme right than from the left, honestly, just look at /pol/ who would gladly genocide 3/4th's of the world.

But all the capitalists seem to be doing is pushing multiculturalism and pro miscegenation propaganda. Yeah the whole "racism is used by rich industrialists to divide the poor" may have been true in the 19th century but is completely the opposite today.

>Racism is tool used by socialists and marxists to increase tension between ethnicities by everchanging the definition what racist behaviour is and using those tensions to divide and conquer the different populations in a civilization.

Yesterday: openly hating other ethnicities
Today: not showing that you accept other ethnicities as your own
Tomorrow: not going out of your way to show how much better other ethnicities are then your own

Disagree.

/pol/ has gone completely off the deep end in recent times. It's more about being contrarian and combative, rather than actually trying to be objective about issues.

Yes and no. There is no socialism without nationalism, and "international" socialism is just Jewish nationalism, because that's the only group who ultimately benefits. Either you're for your own race, ir you're for tge Jews.

/pol/ stopped being white supremacist sometime in 2015 and has gone full blown "civic nationalism" with strong anti Muslim sentiment.

...

dissagree, a form racism was being used all through history do define a right of conquest or exploitation

in societies existing long before capitalism or fascism existed in the first place

the coining of the word is attributed to Trotsky and aimed to further dissolve the enemy capitalist societies

Isn't conquest and exploitation essentially capitalistic in nature, to acquire more capital/labor?

/pol/ is pretty much blind leading the blind with people subscribing to whatever the majority says. Civic nationalism is the hot thing now because it sounds friendlier then NS. This doesn't mean they are in fact NS, or even civic nat for that matter. They use nationalism because they see the lack of it in their own countries and the world as a result for everything that they do not see fit with modern day, pro-immigration, de-churching of society yet warming up to islam etc.

Things that do stick in the /pol/ zeitgeist is anti-communist/marxist views, what they believe are the core part in undermining nationalist views in the first place. Hence distaste for jews.

t. poltard since '12

Yes it is used as a divide and conquer strategy, wouldn't say by the rich per say as they make use of the global market, but by right wing politicians. But that doesn't invalidate it

capitalism is a modern concept, arrived from the dissolvement of the traditional medieval societal division with the merchant and manufacturing classes amassing resources

before that time, although some capitalistic practices existed, the economy in general was concentrated in the hands of the aristocracy

and the values the said aristocracy adhered to did not necessary purely aligned with the accumulation of wealth

>since '12
Newfag

>and the values the said aristocracy adhered to did not necessary purely aligned with the accumulation of wealth

Maybe not all the time but like 90% of the time they tended to though.

>genocide 3/4th's of the world.
Literally nothing wrong with that. In most cases you wouldn't even have to actively harm anyone, one would just have to cease to perpetuate ridiculous unsustainable life practices.

/pol/ is a bunch of meme spouting retards

I liked them better when they spammed Ron Paul macros. Now they're literally /b/ 2.0 and with their cancerous proselytizing i.e. "redpilling" they're attracting untold retards who think this place is some fucking gathering ground for reactionary traditionalists and frog worshippers.

Having a hard time seeing as to why that would be bad?

Eventually Human kind will kill itself unintentionally and far more will die.

Think about it like this.

Kill 75% of the world pop today, or kill 75% of the world pop in anywhere from 500-1000 years from now.

No doubt the world pop will grow if uncontrollable. But of course population control is "wrong"

It's called distributing birth control you fascist retard. Global population is set to stabilize and even decline in recent projections.

Racism is an excuse used by fucktards to explain the shittiness of their existence.

Then why do you leftists attack white people and destroy your own cities?

There is literally nothing wrong with eugenics.

>Global population is set to stabilize and even decline in recent projections.
lol

>Global population is set to stabilize and even decline in recent projections.
lmao

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>Global population is set to stabilize and even decline in recent projections.
kek

>Implying niggers won't by and large shrink in population due to structural government failure by 2050

Where do you think they're all going?

Sweden. 2025 will make 2015 look like a drop in the bucket.

>due to structural government failure
They have had that since the 50's of last century.

It's like they say, whitey will pay.

It may have been at one point. Now antiracism is used to open up labour and other markets.
Also almost all high ranking communists pre Doctor's plot were Jews. Maybe their Loxism was the problem.

Race is a biological reality. It can be used or not used for whatever. It doesn't change the fact anymore than using oxen for plowing puts into question the reality of oxen. OP is an imbecile.

The moderate left is far more racist than the moderate right. I don't think anyone can look at a leftist going to businesses and saying "don't hire him, he's not diverse enough" and not logically conclude that this is racism. By contrast the moderate right seems to want to treat everyone as individuals and look at other ways to solve disparities that don't involve gross violations of people's rights.

I admit Trump's recent election puts a spanner in the works of this theory of mine. It was definitely true just a few years ago however.

Well Trotsky used it to shame the ukrainians into joining the USSR