Which country or group of peoples could be considered the main protagonists throughout history? Pic maybe related

Which country or group of peoples could be considered the main protagonists throughout history? Pic maybe related.

Western Europeans a.k.a. White people

There is only one real answer to this.

Hebrews.

/thread

This.

God knows who the protagonists are.

To recent I mean the only answer that makes sense is China just by existing for so damn long and always coming back together.

It's actually Italians.

This desu. They're the main characters in the bible, Christians and Muslims worship Jews and their Jew-god, they're involved in most major events in Western history and are extremely powerful.

Having the biggest population just makes you mooks, not protagonists.

Honestly? White people.

Delusional biblebanging dipshits detected.

>redditors don't understand Christianity

The Acheans are the original protagonists

>thinks white people are the protagonists of history because they had a few centuries of ascendancy
>calling anyone delusional

Back to your containment board, cancerous piece of shit.

>waaaahh Jews are gods chosen people you stupid meanies!!1!1!
>Anyone who says otherwise is literally hitler

>m-m-muh white power

>m-m-m muh jew power

/thread

samefag

pretty much

>one of the few Bronze age civs to survive
>survive countless genocides and diasporas
>their religion created two of the most powerful religions in the world
>owns America, the most powerful country
>Middle East conflict is center-stage of world politics and Israel is center-stage of such conflict

19th century to present yeah

but beforehand not really

Kys

African Americans

That's a mighty fine MS paint edit you got there.

I hate them, but I have to admit that Jews are the only historical agents worthy of note in the entire history of humanity.

Everyone else is just reacting to their plans and ideas.

Can you tell by the pixels?

>Romans weren't white

>Romans are the be all end all of civilization

>mediterranean sandniggers
>white

nah those are just the greek choir

in a purely eurocentric perspective they were the antagonists

>Achaemenid Empire vs. Greece
>Parthians vs. Romans
>Sassanids vs. Byzantians
>Caliphate vs. Medieval Europe
>Ottoman (they were a part of them) vs. Europe
>Iran vs. America

if by region the protags of the west, center, and east would be Rome, Persia, and China respectively

Middle eastern people. There is always something important happening there.

Delusion. Irrelevant as fuck for most history.
Delusion. Irrelevant as fuck 2500 years ago.

But you see, this is how you can tell when it's a true protagonist. There is a beginning/rise, a fall and an eventual comeback. We have just yet to witness Italys comeback.

Australians

pic related is the main protagonist for war and bigotry.

Unironically this. I'm not even religious and it's hardly even debatable. They're pound for pound the most widely distributed ethnic group across history that are still relevant to this day. No other still standing people have a track record as both long and eventful as the Jews.

>throughout history
sorry nigel

USA could never be, they have only been involved in world affairs for 100 years

the real answer is UK or Italy of course.

Either France or England, desu.

Whether you like it or not, "world history" is just a synonym for "Anglo-French rivalry"

America is unironically the most important nation to ever exist. Everything America does is scrutinized by the entire world, the fate of the United States is tied to the fates of the entire world. If we go down we're taking civilization with us. Nobody else matters like we do.

>Mention the USA can't be a candidate due to only being relevant for 100 years
>Suggests a country that's hasn't been relevant for more than 700 instead
Is this the kind of mental gymnastics anglos go through in every waking moment?

I don't know, but Americans are the comic relief sidekick.

and in turn you're just the frankenstein's monster of franco-anglo colonial competition

ITT: People who think history started in the 17th century

spotted the greekboo

>acknowledging the majority of human history makes me a greekboo
Why are you people even on this board?

anyone trying to shift the debate away from USA/UK/France ITT is inevitably a "muh aristotle" cosplayer

>USA/UK/France
>all countries that have't been relevant prior to the modern era
Not even Napoleon himself would have acted like France was the main character of history.

>>he cares about the filler back story centuries

>But wutabout da JOOOOOS

Nobody said said anything about kikes. The fact that you immediately started bitching about them when someone disagreed with you means that that Hitler comparison wasn't completely wrong.

Jews, Chinese, Indians, or Italians/Romans.

I swear to god Veeky Forums is getting more retarded by the day.

this thread again

but burger you are the anglos!

really there wasn't really an "Indian" people until the Raj

Must be Germans
>bring down Roman Empire
>show continuity with the HRE
>invent printing press and make transfer of knowledge possible
>show the bigotry of catholicism
>be talk of the town ever since.
This board would literally have nothing totalk about without Germany

there are various players that come to prominence

on the whole, it's european peoples and their offshoots

Cockroaches

No, not the shity meme, the actual insects.
Mammals and vertebrates as a whole are overrated.

This tbqhwy

>Ottoman (they were a part of them) vs. Europe

The Ottoman empire never included more than a very small part of Iran.

The holy trinity of the anglo

betrayal
sodomy
genocide

Not pretending we dindu nuffin, but we were still better than any other major power. The wogs will miss us when it's the chinks lording it over them

>english
>doing anything useful

lol

Sorry Jock, but it's only because of the English (Turing, Berners-Lee) that you're able to vent your buttrage

They took a face/heel turn with the whole cross thing, though.

Not sure, OP. Jews do make for a strong contender. To mix things up a bit: If we're assigning character roles, I suggest that athiests would be the overly self-important village idiot who comes along on the ride to "advise" everyone else in the vein of Brainy Smurf. Whenever they inevitably try to show why they should be the main character, it backfires horrendously.

You know I'm right.

This, like them or not, they have an incredible story

>athiests would be the overly self-important village idiot who comes along on the ride to "advise" everyone else in the vein of Brainy Smurf
So... atheists?