Why did Christianity stop emphasizing women's subordinate role?

*to Jewish interests

This

You talk about rationality but all you do is blow hot air

The cold, hard rational truth is that technologies which took the burden out of domestic duties lead to women spending most of their day in idle leisure, which lead to them pursuing interests, which lead to them demanding greater access to the wider economy as these interests grew into dreams and a desire for careers. Any attempt to put this cat back in the back would be to essentially sentence half of the human population to house arrest, which would probably impoverish the lot of them as conditions for a large number of working class people necessitate both parents working and making income, and what happens to women whose husbands run out on them? Are they condemned to starvation or under the table prostitution because they're unable to find work?

Yes, this is a recent development, but what's also a recent development is that 90% of the human population are no longer illiterate starving impoverished subsistence farmers. The great acceleration (which started in 1750 and continues to the present day) is unprecedented in human history, a truly profound upheaval which is producing change at a rate that is very difficult for some people to adapt to, so they fall behind and long for a simpler period when life wasn't complicated. The truth is that all societies are transitional societies in a continuous state of flux, and a golden age is a moment in history where there is nobody left to tell you how much things sucked.

Pic semi-related: in the Italian city-states period/early Republican period men and women were depicted side by side. Yes, women were subordinate to their fathers under pater familias but so were men, and women were able and expected to run their husbands business while he was at war, a dramatically different outlook from Greeks. It wasn't until Augustus (i.e. the start of their degenerate era) that the first laws specifically restricting and punishing the behavior of women were passed

We could easily go back to the 1950s-many women stayed at home but hung out with friends, read, painted etc.

The man got the house taken care of and a wife that looked up to him. The woman got taken care of and could basically have fun her whole life.

Now both parents work, the woman shits out one kid at 36 and goes to work so she can earn money to pay someone else to take care of the kid.

Progress!

Hume's Law you faggots. Rationality can only tell you what is true, not what roles you should assign to people in your society.

Because the Jews along with their lugenpresse and mass media have brainwashed western people into degeneracy and nigger culture worship.

Thus the modern western woman lusts for thick black meat and the western man is being outcasted by third world labour and filth in mass waves.

The Jew is thus continuing his eternal urge to destroy superior cultures in order to one day rule over significantly lower IQ races of mixed mud skinned savages and accrue world domination.

With domination the Jew can have unlimited shekels and also accrue interest on those shekels as well as interest on lending said shekels and also own the property of the dumbed down mud skins once they fail to pay their loans they got to buy sound systems to play degenerate jungle beats on.

I could gobon but the simple answer is - Jews.

Oy vey have a good day.

Technically, in parts of the world, it still does. I'd say, even in the south of America women have a subordinate role, let alone all those African countries we converted.

Wtf I love South America now

because feminists demonize roles as oppressive, when roles have nothing to do with equality. Actual equality would involve allowing the roles to be swapped in certain circumstances. But feminists aren't interested in equality. It's a supremacy movement.

I think they meant THE south. Like all the bible belt and stuff. Idk, I'm not American. It's probably like that in South America too though.

But you have guys with signs saying that they need it because they love getting fucked by their GF's strap on.

fun fact

the bible belt has the highest rate of divorce in america

Not really. Even the most traditional girl here still wants to work for 10 years on her career. I don't think I've met one who explicitly believes she should follow her husband etc but believe me I wish.

Like I said, I'm not American. Pure conjecture, and trying to clarify what I think someone else meant.

Divorce rates don't automatically equate to women being in control though, do they?

I was just guessing what that other guy meant. I have no idea.

Nothing wrong with wanting a career-it's probably sensible in this economic climate.

I literally despise the fact that my gf works. I'm a total penny pincher and we're on track to be millionaires by 35 but I think women irrevocably lost part of their femininity when they went to work.

>We could easily go back to the 1950s-many women stayed at home but hung out with friends, read, painted etc.

You're describing conditions immediately after the New Deal, when the tax rate on upper incomes was %90, when unions and regulations kept corporations in check and from consuming too large a portion of their industry, when productivity gains were still flowing into the pockets of the American working class, the most egalitarian society history has yet produced.

In these conditions women didn't need to work, so most didn't.

The problem was not women entering the work force, the problem has been movement away from these New Deal era policies and toward neoliberal policies which favor those who are already in possession of wealth. stagnating wages combined with rising costs of living are forcing women to stay in the labor pool longer simply to help keep food in their children's stomachs.

Restricting their ability to work isn't going to address the core problem.

Your poor girlfriend. Why don't you find someone more compatible, rather than despise the person you're going out with?

You're free to think that all you want, but you're being unfair on her.

Rationality is irrelevant.

Jews and cultural Marxism

Then that sentence, and this one, make no sense without a logical structure behind the language.

Irrelevance does not imply nonexistence.

If it's irrelevant then why are you using it?

>it's an /r9k/ thread

how can anyone be this retarded is beyond me

It's irrelevant [to Christianity]

>I literally despise the fact that my gf works

You're the worst type of person. I hope your gf cheats on you with someone who isn't some beta loser and that you will raise his children while oblivious of their origin.

As they talked and discussed these things with each other, Jesus himself came up and walked along with them; (Luke 24:15)

He answered, "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind'; and, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'" (Luke 10:27)

That's not rationality being spoken of.

That version of the 1950s never actually existed.

Sure thing schlomo

Oy vet how dare these goyim try to escape a (((career)))

>it's a FDR shill

Just lmao

>a golden age is a moment in history where there is nobody left to tell you how much things sucked.
Reminds me of something, but I don't remember what.

...

300 or so years later and people still continue to derive an ought from an is.

>Irrational
Why is it rational to make hinder societies progress in economics and academic achievement by keeping 50% of the population in bondage.

If you want to make a developing country richer and more developed, improve the status of women. It means you have a lot less economically dependant people, basically.

That's right goy send your women into work; destroy the traditional family and your birth rates for me. You'll get the new iPhone!

Now provide an actual argument.

back to your containment board

Lowering the birth rate below replacement means that a civilization is on the way out in the long run regardless of its current economic success.

Encouraging the majority of women away from being wives and mothers naturally lowers the birth rate, as does birth control. You can claim this is simply a form of progress, but the reality is that in fifty years when the overwhelming majority of the world population is made up of people from cultures which are viewed as a thousand times more patriarchal then a Mormon wet-dream, this women's liberation thing will be regarded with a bit of sick humor.

I'm all for letting women be scientists and business professionals and the like, but the unavoidable darwinian reality of demographics is not something we can ignore entirely, especially not if we're wanting to be a pseudo-democratic society.

>Lmao your civilization is literally dying but why u mad xDD???

Women aren't "encouraged" to not be wives or mothers. Thats just it, they aren't encouraged in any particular at all. Also if part of your reasoning for enforcing a patriarchal society is that you are concerned that not doing so will result in a patriarchal society, then your reasoning is circular.
Besides, the liberalization of women is convergent throughout the world. Western countries were once oppressive and patriarchal and now not so much. It's just a matter of time before different cultures acclimate to the same cultural shifts.

But the birth rate hasn't dropped below replacement in any western country, I think only Korea and Japan have this as an issue.

Fuck off shill

>muh oppression

Yeah I'm so glad we can live in this Progressive Society Free of Hate (TM)

Also the media/society shots on housewives/women in the home constantly

>media pushing strong career wymyn
>lol settle down? That's boring
>how do we get more women in X?
>Ten Reasons Why It's awesome Being Single
etc

Step it up Crew

The Nazis unironically should have won

Wow, that's a retarded map. Just post the replacement rates instead.

>Also if part of your reasoning for enforcing a patriarchal society is that you are concerned that not doing so will result in a patriarchal society, then your reasoning is circular.

No, my argument is that patriarchy is inevitable because it leads to higher reproduction and therefore a more successful civilization, and if patriarchy is going to exist anyway it should rather be a western benign patriarchy instead of a brutal muslim one.

It is still a big thing in third world countries. Not sure what it has to do with Christianity as such.

Next time I hear some slutty "Christian" roastie complain
>ugh Islam is so oppressive to women for making them wear headscarves!!!!! amirite Becky???
I'm going to snap. Modern-day """"Christians"""" literally think that the sexual revolution has always been a thing and can't be assed to read the Bible and know that Christianity has the same exact rules as Islam does

Women don't make things progress though. They had to dumb down education and employment to make it conform to the needs of women.

>muh oppression
>muh patriarchy
Do you people still believe in that shit?

And yes, having children before age 30 is seen as weird in Western society. And God forbid a girl in her prime reproductive age (16-21) gets pregnant, that means her life is ruined forever and the baby MUST be aborted.

What gave you the idea that religion has anything to do with religious texts?

Women graduate from college more than men do. Also they wouldn't have dumbed down employment because that doesn't make economic sense.

College is demonstrably less rigorous than it was in the past. And women tend to "succeed" because of affirmative action.

More men should pass if it is easier.

Demonstrate it then

It didn't the west just stopped being Christian.

Yeah, you can start by living by example by making enough money to support an entire family by yourself while your wife does''t work and spends your money.

Don't blame women if the "men" are inadequate.

It's almost like there was a societal event that halved the value of a mans labor and doubled the pool...

>all these butthurt ledditors are shocked that someone thinks women shouldn't waste their life in schlomo's company

thats fucking retarded

>tfw /pol/ will NEVER be a successful containment board

The labor pool didn't get doubled as women were already working (in formal employment) before the 60s, just not to the same extent.

fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300002

It climbed from around 35-40% in 1960 to 55-60% today.

That's only an increase of 20-25% to its peak and 15-20% to the present.

Men declined in their participation rate from ~85% in 1960 to 70% today, or around 15%.

fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300001

Therefor the increase in the female participation rate was roughly matched by the decrease in the male participation rate.

The idea that women didn't work at all before the 1960s is a myth.

Not to mention women generally had harder lives regarding household care with less of the amenities of the present available, so their non-formal employment was more taxing (although the double-burden of regular work and housework does continue to exist today ofc).

Men go into harder fields.

>50's
>women are traditional housewives
>be happy and fulfilled

>now
>women have more "rights" and "opportunities" than ever
>they are unhappy and depressed

Daily reminder that Feminism goes against nature and biology.

The woman is naturally a caretaker of the kids and housewife.

The man is naturally a builder and laborer.

Increased female employment actually corresponds to higher fertility nowadays (ie. post 1970s) so ironically they might have done something to raise US fertility...

This is a shit map as others have said, TFR is a much better way to look at it since a 2.1 TFR is replacement rates.

It is true that the other user is wrong though, TFR generally is below replacement in most western countries.

But those countries which are below replacement rate also tend to be the most conservative with the lowest female employment rates and the least assistance for them when they work (such as Germany for the latter), so it doesn't really prove you point.

>human nature
Spooky also

Feminism is just another symptom of a mentally ill godless society.

You can thank atheism for the normalization of:
>Homosexuality
>Transvestites
>Gay """""""Marriage"""""""
>LGBQTBBCABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP movement
>Social "Justice" Warriors
>Abortion (murder of innocent babies)
>Moral Relativism (bro just do whatever u want, it's all relative ;^)
>dude baphomet, man is girl, girl is man, lmao

C.S. Lewis and Albert Mohler have warned us about this. As Bible-believing Christians we have to stand steadfast against the hordes of irrational God-hating leftists.

Women are not equal to man, this is just retarded. There are biological differences. Women are weaker and this is why they gravitate towards care-taking jobs like nurses, as
said.

Liberals like to demonize and pretend the traditional housewife is something to be ashamed of, when it's not. It's the same reason they also demonize masculinity and fatherhood.

Liberals (let's be honest, Communists) want to destroy the Family fabric because that is where the building block of a nation is. Once you destroy the family, it's all about the state. That's what Commies want, big government intruding in our life, telling us how to live and what to think.

Here is an excellent philosophical video on the topic of Sexual Morality and house roles by C.S. Lewis:
youtube.com/watch?v=-RkZXZx6HCI

Not an argument.

So what you're saying is that STEM classes are still hard which means women attending college doesn't even matter because you just have to choose the right field.

>Daily reminder that Feminism goes against nature and biology.
Daily reminder that humans prefer freedom over a gilded cage.

We've been fighting what is "natural" since we first started building fires and painting on cave walls.

And if you're an obese, socially inept, psychologically arrested manbaby, demanding that society provide you with a qt3.14 wife like what you see in all that porn you waste your life masturbating too is the height of an entitlement complex.

>t.cleetus buttblasted because he can't use his bible to beat his wife when she complains about him spending his paycheck on beer and video games instead of diapers

>prefer freedom over a gilded cage
Can I have the freedom to rape your daughter and slit her throat?

Do you know how the world would look like if everybody just acted on their impulses and instincts without self-control?

>we first started building fires and painting on cave walls
Oh, you're an evolutionist. Credibility lost.

Go back a little bit further to around 1900.

Anyways women didn't have careers or higher ed for the most part-they worked an odd job, got knocked up and then stayed home. Employers used to not hire women because they would get jobs looking for men to marry.

Thanks brothers

Just proves once again that most atheists are really just rebelling against the idea of a code of conduct

>Can I have the freedom to rape your daughter and slit her throat?
That's not freedom, that's the opposite of freedom: that's demanding that somebody else sacrifice their freedom just because you lack the impulse control to function properly in civil society.

>Do you know how the world would look like if everybody just acted on their impulses and instincts without self-control?
You mean like the impulse to suppress the self-agency of women in a mad rush to justify why you're still a fat, kissless loser with no social skills?

>Oh, you're an evolutionist. Credibility lost.
Oh, I see facts and data doesn't work on you. Thanks for clarifying, cletus.

>It's a fact in my mind!

lol

Catholic, actually. Nature is something we are in the process of overcoming.

And the ones rebelling against the idea of a code of conduct are all the Nazi-wannabes who can't handle a society where we let women have jobs and take care of themselves if that's the life they wish to lead.

All of those hoaxes were exposed and discredited by scientists and journalists, not bible-thumpers and brown-shirts

Creationist scientists and journalists.

The 1950s is widely viewed as the golden age of men working and women staying at home. I showed this was wrong, there is no need to go back to 1900 as every comparison every done assumes 1950 as the baseline. You're simply raising points which are irrelevant concerning objections to this, this is the labor participation rate, this demonstrates how much women worked in the formal economy. It can be factually proven that women's participation was already extensive long before the 1960s.

lol Jesus you're a fucking idiot
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man#Exposure
>In November 1953, Time magazine published evidence gathered variously by Kenneth Page Oakley, Sir Wilfrid Edward Le Gros Clark and Joseph Weiner proving that the Piltdown Man was a forgery
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Oakley
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilfrid_Le_Gros_Clark
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Weiner

Look at all those legitimate scientists doing real research with not a Bible in sight!

Scientists alive today who accept the biblical account of creation:

Dr Paul Ackerman, Psychologist
Dr E. Theo Agard, Medical Physics
Dr James Allan, Geneticist
Dr Steve Austin, Geologist
Dr S.E. Aw, Biochemist
Dr Thomas Barnes, Physicist
Dr Geoff Barnard, Immunologist
Dr Don Batten, Plant physiologist, tropical fruit expert
Dr John Baumgardner, Electrical Engineering, Space Physicist, Geophysicist, expert in supercomputer modeling of plate tectonics
Dr Jerry Bergman, Psychologist
Dr Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology
Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology
Dr Raymond G. Bohlin, Biologist
Dr Markus Blietz, Astrophysicist
Dr Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology
Edward A. Boudreaux, Theoretical Chemistry
Dr David R. Boylan, Chemical Engineer
Prof. Linn E. Carothers, Associate Professor of Statistics
Dr Robert W. Carter, Zoology (Marine Biology and Genetics)
Dr David Catchpoole, Plant Physiologist (read his testimony)
Prof. Sung-Do Cha, Physics
Dr Eugene F. Chaffin, Professor of Physics
Dr Choong-Kuk Chang, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Jeun-Sik Chang, Aeronautical Engineering
Dr Donald Chittick, Physical Chemist
Prof. Chung-Il Cho, Biology Education
Dr John M. Cimbala, Mechanical Engineering

Dr Harold Coffin, Palaeontologist
Dr Bob Compton, DVM
Dr Ken Cumming, Biologist
Dr Jack W. Cuozzo, Dentist
Dr William M. Curtis III, Th.D., Th.M., M.S., Aeronautics & Nuclear Physics
Dr Malcolm Cutchins, Aerospace Engineering
Dr Lionel Dahmer, Analytical Chemist
Dr Raymond V. Damadian, M.D., Pioneer of magnetic resonance imaging
Dr Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist
Dr Nancy M. Darrall, Botany
Dr Bryan Dawson, Mathematics
Dr Douglas Dean, Biological Chemistry
Prof. Stephen W. Deckard, Assistant Professor of Education
Dr David A. DeWitt, Biology, Biochemistry, Neuroscience
Dr Don DeYoung, Astronomy, atmospheric physics, M.Div
Dr Geoff Downes, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr Ted Driggers, Operations research
Robert H. Eckel, Medical Research
Dr André Eggen, Geneticist
Dr Edward Elmer, Orthopedic surgery specialist (Harvard Medical School graduate)
Prof. Dennis L. Englin, Professor of Geophysics
Prof. Danny Faulkner, Astronomy
Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology
Prof. Dwain L. Ford, Organic Chemistry
Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology

Dr Alan Galbraith, Watershed Science
Dr Paul Giem, Medical Research
Dr Maciej Giertych, Geneticist
Dr Tim Gilmour, Electrical Engineer
Dr Duane Gish, Biochemist
Dr Werner Gitt, Information Scientist
Dr D.B. Gower, Biochemistry
Dr Dianne Grocott, Psychiatrist
Dr Stephen Grocott, Industrial Chemist
Dr Donald Hamann, Food Scientist
Dr Barry Harker, Philosopher
Dr Charles W. Harrison, Applied Physicist, Electromagnetics
Dr John Hartnett, Physicist and Cosmologist
Dr Mark Harwood, Satellite Communications
Dr Joe Havel, Botanist, Silviculturist, Ecophysiologist
Dr George Hawke, Environmental Scientist
Dr Margaret Helder, Science Editor, Botanist
Dr Harold R. Henry, Engineer
Dr Jonathan Henry, Astronomy
Dr Joseph Henson, Entomologist
Dr Robert A. Herrmann, Professor of Mathematics, US Naval Academy
Dr Andrew Hodge, Head of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Service
Dr Kelly Hollowell, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacologist
Dr Ed Holroyd, III, Atmospheric Science

Dr Bob Hosken, Biochemistry
Dr George F. Howe, Botany
Dr Neil Huber, Physical Anthropologist
Dr Russell Humphreys, Physicist
Dr James A. Huggins, Professor and Chair, Department of Biology
Evan Jamieson, Hydrometallurgy
George T. Javor, Biochemistry
Dr Pierre Jerlström, Creationist Molecular Biologist
Dr Arthur Jones, Biology
Dr Jonathan W. Jones, Plastic Surgeon
Dr Raymond Jones, Agricultural Scientist
Dr Felix Konotey-Ahulu, Physician, leading expert on sickle-cell anemia
Prof. Leonid Korochkin, Molecular Biology
Dr Valery Karpounin, Mathematical Sciences, Logics, Formal Logics
Dr Dean Kenyon, Biologist
Prof. Gi-Tai Kim, Biology
Prof. Harriet Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jong-Bai Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jung-Han Kim, Biochemistry
Prof. Jung-Wook Kim, Environmental Science
Prof. Kyoung-Rai Kim, Analytical Chemistry
Prof. Kyoung-Tai Kim, Genetic Engineering
Prof. Young-Gil Kim, Materials Science
Prof. Young In Kim, Engineering
Dr John W. Klotz, Biologist
Dr Vladimir F. Kondalenko, Cytology/Cell Pathology
Dr Leonid Korochkin, M.D., Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology
Dr John K.G. Kramer, Biochemistry

Prof. Jin-Hyouk Kwon, Physics
Prof. Myung-Sang Kwon, Immunology
Dr John G. Leslie, biochemistry, molecular biology, medicine, biblical archaeology
Prof. Lane P. Lester, Biologist, Genetics
Dr Jason Lisle, Astrophysicist
Dr Alan Love, Chemist
Dr Ian Macreadie, molecular biologist and microbiologist:
Dr John Marcus, Molecular Biologist
Dr George Marshall, Eye Disease Researcher
Dr Ralph Matthews, Radiation Chemist
Dr John McEwan, Chemist
Prof. Andy McIntosh, Combustion theory, aerodynamics
Dr David Menton, Anatomist
Dr Angela Meyer, Creationist Plant Physiologist
Dr John Meyer, Physiologist
Dr Albert Mills, Reproductive Physiologist, Embryologist
Colin W. Mitchell, Geography
Dr John N. Moore, Science Educator
Dr John W. Moreland, Mechanical engineer and Dentist
Dr Henry M. Morris, Hydrologist
Dr John D. Morris, Geologist
Dr Len Morris, Physiologist
Dr Graeme Mortimer, Geologist
Stanley A. Mumma, Architectural Engineering
Prof. Hee-Choon No, Nuclear Engineering
Dr Eric Norman, Biomedical researcher
Dr David Oderberg, Philosopher

Prof. John Oller, Linguistics
Prof. Chris D. Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biology
Dr John Osgood, Medical Practitioner
Dr David Pace, Organic Chemistry
Dr Charles Pallaghy, Botanist
Dr Gary E. Parker, Biologist, Cognate in Geology (Paleontology)
Dr David Pennington, Plastic Surgeon
Prof. Richard Porter
Dr Georgia Purdom, Molecular Genetics
Dr Albert E. Pye, invertebrate zoology, biotechnology, biological control (1945–2012)
Dr John Rankin, Cosmologist
Dr A.S. Reece, M.D.
Prof. J. Rendle-Short, Pediatrics
Dr Jung-Goo Roe, Biology
Dr David Rosevear, Chemist
Dr Ariel A. Roth, Biology
Dr John Sanford, Geneticist
Dr Jonathan D. Sarfati, Physical chemist / spectroscopist
Dr Joachim Scheven Palaeontologist:
Dr Ian Scott, Educator

Dr Saami Shaibani, Forensic physicist
Dr Young-Gi Shim, Chemistry
Prof. Hyun-Kil Shin, Food Science
Dr Mikhail Shulgin, Physics
Dr Emil Silvestru, Geologist/karstologist
Dr Roger Simpson, Engineer
Dr Harold Slusher, Geophysicist
Dr E. Norbert Smith, Zoologist
Dr Andrew Snelling, Geologist
Prof. Man-Suk Song, Computer Science
Dr Timothy G. Standish, Biology
Prof. James Stark, Assistant Professor of Science Education
Prof. Brian Stone, Engineer
Dr Esther Su, Biochemistry
Dr Charles Taylor, Linguistics
Dr Stephen Taylor, Electrical Engineering
Dr Ker C. Thomson, Geophysics
Dr Michael Todhunter, Forest Genetics
Dr Lyudmila Tonkonog, Chemistry/Biochemistry
Dr Royal Truman, Organic Chemist:
Dr Larry Vardiman, Atmospheric Science
Prof. Walter Veith, Zoologist
Dr Joachim Vetter, Biologist
Dr Tas Walker, Mechanical Engineer and Geologist
Dr Jeremy Walter, Mechanical Engineer
Dr Keith Wanser, Physicist
Dr Noel Weeks, Ancient Historian (also has B.Sc. in Zoology)
Dr A.J. Monty White, Chemistry/Gas Kinetics
Dr John Whitmore, Geologist/Paleontologist
Dr Carl Wieland, Medical doctor
Dr Lara Wieland, Medical doctor
Dr Clifford Wilson, Psycholinguist and archaeologist (1923–2012)
Dr Kurt Wise, Palaeontologist
Dr Bryant Wood, Creationist Archaeologist
Prof. Seoung-Hoon Yang, Physics
Dr Thomas (Tong Y.) Yi, Ph.D., Creationist Aerospace & Mechanical Engineer
Dr Ick-Dong Yoo, Genetics
Dr Sung-Hee Yoon, Biology
Dr Patrick Young, Chemist and Materials Scientist
Prof. Keun Bae Yu, Geography
Dr Henry Zuill, Biology