We all know that the eastern front has the majority of fighting in WW2...

We all know that the eastern front has the majority of fighting in WW2, but which theatre had the most aesthetic feel to it?

Has to be Normandy right?

>WW2 thread No.2464726
saged

Eastern front was the most aesthetic for sure

>but which theatre had the most aesthetic feel to it?

Eastern front desu.

Only Kursk

>Mememandy
No, either Eastern Front or North Africa.

i'd say the whole front was pretty aesthetic not only kursk

Never knew Russia looked like Kansas

>fields....tanks...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

kansas has steppes?
lol are you 15?

zzzzzzzzzzzzz

Now the German invasion of Crete is AESTHETIC

>kansas has steppes?
What the fuck do you think the prairies are?

why do you keep replying with autism?
oh right, i thought kansas specifically had landscape similar to russia not just like 1/3rd of north america

...

Leningrad Front+ Siege

Italy was the most aesthetic front.

The eastern front. That's where the Germans were sending all their big tanks which while maybe not the most versatile, were definitely aesthetic

t.luigi

>marshall
>of
>italy

>Normandy
>Krauts having combinations of their 1900s aesthetic dress uniforms and modern camouflage uniforms
>Krauts using old bolt action rifles and modern assault rifles
>Huge beasts of a tanks designed in desperation
>Krauts trying desperately throw their remaining missiles at London
>Some of the biggest 'merica fuck yeah moments in history

Tiger looks like a retarded metal box

>Has to be Normandy right?
tired of normany desu. i think its shilled to hard so that ive become deadened to it. i also don't like how the whole western front invasion has been made into a hagiography. eastern front meanwhile will never be understood by the plebs as having been the most bloody front, adding up to more casualties than the other fronts combined cause anti-russian or anti-soviet idiocy

wrong war senpai

name a more aesthetic weapon
you can't

Pak 44 is four paks better