ITT: Post your country's villains using this template

ITT: Post your country's villains using this template

>Mexico

Fox did nothing wrong esé.

>Ordaz that high
Fucker killed a shit ton of students. Yeah, maybe they were commies but the kind of shit he did would only happen on China.

Also Fox was only a retard, not really a villain.

But the history marked him as a villain or a retard.
He was ut [s4s] personified

He had no choice but to do it, America would have marked us like commies and started to fuck us even more

He could've targeted them one by one instead of getting civilian supporters killed and making a massacre. He felt highly pressured because of the Olympics, he wasn't really forced.

Exactly, he did evil because of the situation he found himself in

OP's the kind of Mexican that likes Pena Nieto, thinks narco-mafias running roughshod over the people is ok, and begs USA "Oh yes, please Ameri-fats and Fucking Leafs! Take all our petroleum and beaches and mineral resources. We happily swallow your benis, Ameri-fats!"

No, i want an isolationist government with a free market based on our own products.Fuck Americans and Centroamericans too.

Porfirio was killed because USA felt threatened and they used Madero as a puppet. The same happened to Iturbide

>being this delusional

LMAO, fresa!

Porfirio literally a US puppet.

Get that cock out of your mouth.

The US corporations were making billions off of Mexico's land, petroleum and mineral wealth during the entirety of the Porfiriato.

>Porfirio was killed because USA felt threatened and they used Madero as a puppet.

> Huerta did not play a major role in the early stages of the Revolution, although he commanded the military escort which gave Díaz safe conduct into exile, he initially pledged allegiance to the new administration of Francisco Madero, and he was retained by the Madero administration to crush anti-Madero revolts by rebel generals such as Pascual Orozco. However, Huerta secretly plotted with United States Ambassador to Mexico Henry Lane Wilson,[7] cashiered General Bernardo Reyes, and Félix Díaz, Porfirio Díaz's nephew, to overthrow Madero. This episode in Mexican history is known as La decena trágica (Ten Tragic Days). Following a confused few days of fighting in Mexico City between loyalist and rebel factions of the Army, Huerta had Madero and vice-president José María Pino Suárez seized and briefly imprisoned on 18 February 1913 in the National Palace. The conspirators then met at the U.S. Embassy to sign El Pacto de la Embajada (The Embassy Pact), which provided for the exile of Madero and Pino Suárez, and Huerta's takeover of the Mexican government.[8]

Posting some content instead of arguing about spic stuff.

So who was right in the revolution?

Nobody. Villa was a bandit, Zapata was only protecting his property, Carranza and Obregon were only concerned with getting more power and Carranza was already part of the elite in Diaz dictatorship. The best one was Madero but the guy was too idealistic for his own good.

>Bettino
>Bad

I was named after I obregon...

At least he was a good statesman. He seemed to have more of a talent for it than others
Also got any details on villa? There's a lot of misinformation about him

>Czechoslovakia
From top:
Radola Gajda
Czechoslovak general, one of the commanders of our Legions in Russian Civil war, later fascist politician. Famous for his proposition that being "Honorary Aryan" is licking Jewish hands and that NSDAP is Judeo-Masonic organization.

Josef Urválek
Procurator and judge, sentenced 15 people to death.

Klement Gottwald
First Czechoslovak socialist president, did nothing wrong.

Emil Hácha
Puppet president of Nazis, bealived that people arent bad, did not deserved his fate.

Emanuel Moravec
Czechoslovak general, at first supporter of resistence against German demands in 1938, but got brainwashed by German propaganda and became "Minister of Education and National Enlightenment"

Václav "The Cuck" Havel
Overrated, nobody outside of Prague and Plzeň gives a shit about him.

Villains of your country or from your country?

From your own country

But then villains according to whom? The heros of your own country are often the villain of another one.

USA

How was Bush in any way or form great?

From your country's perspective and yours i guess

>only did evil things because of the situation they find themselves in

Sounds about right.

Details about his life? He was literally a criminal but a charismatic one. The guy was a shit tier military leader, though. He was better at guerilla tactics, something of course he knew because he was a bandit.

Good post.

Why is he worshipped then? Did he do good? Was he protecting the interests of commoners?

Also, how was Alvaro obregon? Since I have his first name, it would be kinda shitty for him to have been shit tier

Turkey

I made this one.If anyone doesn't know who is who in each picture just ask me
>Spain

Who's the first one?

Who are they?
t.ignorant person

List is missing Cheney.

Conde duque de Olivares
Spanish valido during Phillip's the IV reign.All the court hated him because he was plotting against everyone all the time.For example sending people to Flandes to get them away from the court and when they were there they were arrested even when the king didn't know about it.He also tried to centralize Spain as a measure to erradicate protestantism which caused a lot of hate in Catalonia and Portugal.At the end he was a good man in a snake nest that tried to safe his country from collapsing and this caused lots of anger

He kept Spain catholic and made Catalanes mad, so he is okay in my book

>MLK
Wouldn't Malcolm X be more appropriate? Did MLK really cause any overall negative effects by his own actions?

...

...

>not putting killery at the bottom
Realy boggles my noggle

What did he mean by this?

Some Fresh OC, regarding the Sengoku period

Worshipped by commies and anarchists because he was the only big Revolution leader without a privileged background. As for Obregon, he was fairly educated but treacherous. He was opportunistic but a fairly good leader that was smart and humble enough to delegate in the areas he wasn't versed enough. His biggest mistake was that he thought possible to revive a dictatorship

From top to bottom:

Turgut Özal
Founder of the Fatherland Party. He democritized turkey after the 1980 coup. Many people hate him becase they think he was either too capitalist or too secular.

Adnan Menderes
Tried to liberalise the economy. It backfired really hard. He got hanged.

Kenan Evren
The general who organised the 1980 coup. He was legit power-hungry but this probably wasn't his main intention.

Abdullah Öcalan
Kurdish separatist. Nobody except the kurds like him.

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
Was doing really good before the 2012 election. Then he went insane and fucked the country.

Fetullah Gülen
Was probably running the country until the recent coup attempt. Think recent events at South Korea but more islamic and bad.

Haha yes, this is a good post my friend, I like this post so much I am going to tell you I enjoyed it, thank you for making this funny meme, good day sir :)

Low quality bait

France

Thanks

You can tell the edgy contrarian stance in the coming years is to say you didn't vote for either or them.

t.neocuck

>Jackson
>plunged the country into an economic and constitutional crisis because of his ego
>opened the door to disgusting plebs voting
>good

...

Nah it's the current "enlightened centrist" position. Contrarianism is a meme in and of itself. People will only pretend to be contrarian if it gives them some social status.

>an obnoxious, shrill, but harmless feminist
>somehow worse than the absolute fucking moron that is trump

Literally just switch Gulen and Erdogan.

>Fernando VII.

Poor guy, he just wanted to rule as an absolutist and be left alone, but not the liberals had to say no, and then the carlists had to say no, and then the republicans had to say no...

If only everyone would have just shut up about it...

>because ego

lmaoing @your historical illiteracy

Letting plebs vote is better than having usurious fucks burn everything to the ground.

He was plain stupid and evil.Couping aginst his father,dishing the constituion,sending armies against civilians,asked foreign countries to invade Spain,spending all the resources in conquering Mexico again and then flip floping with his inheritance which caused 3 civil wars in 70 years

The bank was literally the thing that made the US have a currency, you insane little fuck. And taking it out destroyed the economy.

Lemme guess, you think "le Fed Jooz are ebil and destroying the world", too?

Gotta give credit to the bastard, the man actually achieved his ultimate objective(absolutist rule) even though everyone started despising him after he started opening his big borbonic mouth, he fought to his last breath to achieve his dream, and unlike other people who try too hard and fail he actually had the balls to win.

I mean, he is a walking example of why a monarchy is not a good idea; because they might achieve what THEY want.

Here ya go

He achieved to have absolute power in exchange of losing an entire empire an putting the life of her wife and daughter at risk.His only real virtue was his huge dick which is pretty much pointless for a ruler

Switch Bernie and Trump. Bernie just wants free shit but Trump can be sporadic at times like tweeting about the next watergate done by Obama but 30 minutes latter insulting the guy who took spot on tv and quite.

>you have to make a bank private to print currency
>speculation and inflation is "the economy"
>implying crash wasn't caused by English interest rates and Biddle being an obstructionist kike with bank credits

Ok Shlomo

>an entire empire

Welp, after Napoleon... there wasn't that much of an empire left to defend, the damn colonies sure knew how to take an oportunity.

I only recognize Mussolini and Berlusconi. Who are the others?

>there wasn't that much of an empire left to defend
Mexico to begin with offered him to be their king.He refused.And Perú was still loyal to him.If he hadn't destroyed the constitution and would just take a secundary rol he could have been the king of Spain,Mexico and Perú.And from there Colombia and Argentina couldn't do much to fight back

>Mexico to begin with offered him to be their king

I'm gonna need some sauces on that...

>the Joooooooz did it!
>the Joooooooooooooooooooz!

This is why no one will ever take you morons seriously.

The 4th guy was the one who just changed the constitution because he wanted to, right?

The top is Giolitti

'sup neocuck

>/co/ meme

>he has no response
>Proceededs to sperg out
>I said it was kikes because I called Biddle a kike

That's a YUGE logical leap there Chaim.

t. JIDF

...

'sup JIDF

>torquemada
>Alba
>Enrique de Trastamara?
>Pizarro
>Franco
>Fernando VII

Eternal Anglo checking in

Move Franco to High or Great tier, the guy was just responding to a failing goverment at a moment when shit was about to hit the fan for everyone that was considered of the oposing party.

USA

Top should be Richard III, Cromwell is clearly the bottom bracket. He rebelled against the kings and then became a king and pretended he wasn't.

...

USA.

France

Who's the dude above Nixon?

Why is there a Frenchman listed in there (below Churchill)?

George Lincoln Rockwell

Is that a fedora doubting Based Richard III or denying that Cromwell was a hypocrite and a piece of shit who was wrong about nearly everything and really just wanted to be King.

Norman but an English king so... Also very much fits the type. Betrayed by Edward and Harold, but became the real villain.

>Based Nappy
>Villain

'no'

About Cromwell

>Wilson
>Better motives

Wew lad

Oh it's the /pol/ list, should've known from the other placements.

>Unironically was right about everything he said at the time
>Not having better motives than everyone else

...

That's why Iturbide became Emperor; they offered the title to Ferdinand but he flatly rejected any compromise and forbade any other European Royal to accept instead of him.

t. Filthy Legitimist

Genuinely good post.

>any of those but Petain and Robespierre
>villains

That being said, Petain and Robespierre really do belong in their respective tiers.

>All this americans that just know about the history of America + some memes about Napoleon