How can one race of people so thoroughly BTFO the entire world?

How can one race of people so thoroughly BTFO the entire world?

Other urls found in this thread:

web.archive.org/web/20131029190343/http://www.ukom.gov.si/en/media_relations/background_information/culture/worlds_oldest_wheel_found_in_slovenia/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamna_culture#Physical_characteristics
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afanasevo_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelteminar_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshemys_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poltavka_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okunev_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhukaigou_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glazkov_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andronovo_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elunin_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krotov_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tazabagyab_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordos_culture
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Superior genetics

P.S. Only delusional creationists will deny this

we wuz normies t. op

We wuz (and still iz) hyperboreans.

real talk though it was domesticating horses and inventing the chariot

also the ability to digest lactose

Chariots.

>Linguistic group.
>One race.

mongoloids went further tho

in the 1500s, all of the americas, ottoman turks, siberian khanates, mughals, qajar-afsharid persians, qing china, polynesia, austronesia, etc. etc.

then smallpox happened

Except they didn't do either of those things you cretin.

yes

1. "INDOEUROPEAN" IS A LINGUONYM, NOT A RACIONYM, AN ETHNONYM, NOR A CULTURONYM; IT REFERS TO A PEOPLE THE LANGUAGE OF WHICH BELONGS TO THE INDOEUROPEAN LANGUAGE FAMILY.

"INDOEUROPEAN", AND "ARYAN", ARE NOT MUTUALLY SYNONYMOUS, AS YOU SEEM TO SUGGEST, OR ERRONEOUSLY BELIEVE.

"ARYAN" IS A RACIONYM, AND A CULTURONYM; IT REFERS TO THE ARYAN RACE, OR TO A PEOPLE DESCENDED FROM IT, AND AS A CULTURONYM, IT REFERS TO CUSTOMS, PRACTICES, VALUES, OR PRINCIPLES, THAT ORIGINATED WITH, OR THAT BEFIT, THE CULTURE OF THE ARYANS.

2. THE ARYANS DID NOT ORIGINATE IN THE CAUCASUS; THE "KURGAN HYPOTHESIS" S A JEWISH PERVERSION; ITS SOLE PURPOSE IS TO OCCLUDE THE TRUTH REGARDING THE ORIGIN OF THE ARYANS, WHILST ALSO OCCLUDING ANY KNOWLEDGE REGARDING THE KHAZARS —ORIGINAL JEWS— BY PLACING THE ARYAN URHEIMAT EXACTLY ON THE KHAZAR/JEWISH URHEIMAT.

THE NORTHERN CAUCASUS IS TURANIAN TERRITORY, NOT ARYAN TERRITORY.

>hundreds of different races came from the exact same area all speaking the same language
Ahh, now, I understand...

fuck off you wrong arab cuck

>Linguistic group = The same language.
Kek.

>the same language = the same language
SHOCKING

PAY DEBT

Not Race, but culture.

>Better adapted to environmental change that could revert to pastoralism when crop failure

>Pastoralism allowed long distance travel and commerce

>A 3rd reason that I don't know

...

bisons/buffalo went even further tho

africa, europe, asia, americas, australia etc. etc

Except they did you mongoloid.

this

>be prehistoric Central Asian
>member of heavy-bearded, aquiline-nosed Yamna, Afanasevo, Andronovo, Tocharian, Scythian, Bactrian, Sogdian
>invent the wheel and chariot
>first to domesticate the horse
>build prehistoric cities
>meet innocent looking Eskimo-like people in the periphery of your civilization, in the tundra
>teach them your ways of the horse and lifestyle, transfer your knowledge and technology
>they adopt and adapt to your Scythian ways
>they expand from their tundra, permafrost territory
>gradually take ownershership of Scythian clay
>for the next couple eons you fail against their onslaughts
>indigigenous Scythians of Asia is now replaced by Mongolids

The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World (ISBN 0-691-05887-3) is a 2007 book by David W. Anthony, The book explores the origins of Indo-European languages (now spoken by three billion people) in the context of the domestication of the horse and invention of the wheel in the Eurasian Grass-Steppe


>Indo-European invention of the wheel

>The Ljubljana Marshes Wooden Wheel, the world's oldest known wooden wheel, dating from 5,250 ± 100 BP as part of Globular Amphora Culture of Indo-European origin

web.archive.org/web/20131029190343/http://www.ukom.gov.si/en/media_relations/background_information/culture/worlds_oldest_wheel_found_in_slovenia/

Indo-Europeans domesticated the horse and invented the wheel and the chariot.

Indo-Europeans have conquered the world, colonized entire continents and were the first to travel to space (Asiatics, able copy-cats, but uncreative, arrived second; Africans will never do it on their own).

About 2/3 of all spoken languages in existence is Indo-European.

The Aryan race is the flower of mankind; without it, humanity would hardly be worth anything.

Non-Aryans, are you even trying?

It was mostly thanks to the gains you get from milk in all honesty famiglia

When are you going to stop posting

The Arabic in your name isn't right btw

>domesticated the horse

Right.

>invented the wheel and the chariot

Wrong. The wheel was invented in Neolithic Mesopotamia and chariot in Neolithic Europe.

Aren't they from more east?

But i think the general consensus is that they had war and patriarchy and fighting while everyone else was peaceful egalitarian hippies.

How else do you explain the utter cultural and racial domination of the Indo-Europeans. I mean almost all men are descended from them while women have far more native genetics, which means almost all the native women got fucked and the native men got cucked.

This isn't exactly what happened. East Scythians became heavily Mongoloid admixed a very long time before Turkic languages expanded.

West Scythians in Europe had lower levels of Mongoloid admixture and may have been one vector of transmission of it to East Slavs.

www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14615

>Indo-European invention of the wheel

>The Ljubljana Marshes Wooden Wheel, the world's oldest known wooden wheel, dating from 5,250 ± 100 BP as part of Globular Amphora Culture of Indo-European origin

web.archive.org/web/20131029190343/http://www.ukom.gov.si/en/media_relations/background_information/culture/worlds_oldest_wheel_found_in_slovenia/

There's no DNA studies on GA yet.

Outdated: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel

>The invention of the wheel falls into the late Neolithic, and may be seen in conjunction with other technological advances that gave rise to the early Bronze Age. Note that this implies the passage of several wheel-less millennia even after the invention of agriculture and of pottery, during the Aceramic Neolithic (9500–6500 BCE).

>The Halaf culture of 6500–5100 BCE is sometimes credited with the earliest depiction of a wheeled vehicle, but this is doubtful as there is no evidence of Halafians using either wheeled vehicles or even pottery wheels.

>Precursors of wheels, known as "tournettes" or "slow wheels", were known in the Middle East by the 5th millennium BCE (one of the earliest examples was discovered at Tepe Pardis, Iran, and dated to 5200–4700 BCE). These were made of stone or clay and secured to the ground with a peg in the center, but required effort to turn. True (freely-spinning) potter's wheels were apparently in use in Mesopotamia by 3500 BCE and possibly as early as 4000 BCE,[4] and the oldest surviving example, which was found in Ur (modern day Iraq), dates to approximately 3100 BCE.

>dates to approximately 3100 BCE in middle east


>the world's oldest known wooden wheel, dating from 5,250 ± 100 BP as part of Globular Amphora Culture of Indo-European
> 5,250 ± 100 BP
>Slovenia

why don't they even talk about the PIE invasions in school...like at all?

>history aint near eastern biblical
das antisemitic goy

>le Aryan meme

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamna_culture#Physical_characteristics

>The genetic basis of a number of physical features of the Yamnaya people were ascertained by the ancient DNA study conducted by Haak et al. (2015), Wilde et al.(2014), Mathieson et al. (2015) : they were genetically tall (phenotypic height is determined by both genetics and environmental factors), overwhelmingly dark-eyed (brown), dark-haired and had a skin colour that was moderately light, though somewhat darker than that of the average modern European.[18][5] Surprisingly, given their pastoral lifestyle, there was little evidence of lactase persistence.

It's not Hitler or the Tudors

Swedish and German homonauts been marketing themselves as Aryans for too long.

you can't have a language family unless it was at one point a single language.

Afanasevo early Indo-Europeans, metal-use, horses and wheeled vehicles, and cultural relations with Kurgan steppe cultures, the Afanasevans were IE-speaking.[7] Afanasevo were genetically indistinguishable from Yamnaya people. Afanasevo were responsible for the introduction of metallurgy to China.

Afanasevo culture was replaced by second wave of Indo-European migrations from Andronovo culture during late Bronze Age and early Iron Age, to dramatically influence Elunin/Krotov/Tashkov culture as well as Persia, India, Caucasus, and most of Eurasia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afanasevo_culture

Kelteminar culture (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan 5500BC) (Mongoloid)
The Kelteminar people practised a mobile hunting, gathering and fishing subsistence system.
The Kelteminar people lived in huge houses (size 24m x 17m and height 10m), which housed the whole tribal community of about 100-120 people.
The Kelteminar economy was based on sedentary fishing and hunting.

Scientists hold that Kelteminar culture is related to the Pit–Comb Ware culture and belongs to the Finno-Ugric peoples.
The Kelteminar culture was replaced by the IE Tazabagyab culture

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelteminar_culture

Bolshemys culture (Altai) (4000 BCE) (Mongoloid)

The Bolshemys foot hunter economy engaged in hunting of hoofed animals—roe deer, musk deer, red deer, and Siberian ibex, and mouflon
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshemys_culture

Poltavka culture (Volga 2700BC) (Caucasoid)
Poltavka culture, 2700—2100 BC, culture of the middle Volga from about where the Don-Volga canal begins up to the Samara bend, with an easterly extension north of present Kazakhstan along the Samara River valley to somewhat west of Orenburg.

Continuation of the Yamna, but the only real things that distinguish it from the Yamna culture are changes in pottery and an increase in metal objects. It is presumptively early Indo-Iranian (Proto-Indo-Iranian).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poltavka_culture

Okunev culture (Siberia) (2500 BCE) (Mongoloid)
Glazkov culture (Baikal 18th BCE) (Mongoloid)
Zhukaigou culture (Mongolia, China 2000 BC) (Mongoloid)
Karakol culture (Altai 2nd millennium BC) (Mongoloid)
The chief occupation of the Okunev population was stock raising (cattle, sheep, and goats), supplemented by hunting and fishing.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okunev_culture

The Zhukaigou culture (Inner Mongolia, China) appears to have begun as one of hunter-gatherers,
maternal genetic evidence showing that they were related to the remains from Yinniugou, as well as modern populations like Daurs and Evenks
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhukaigou_culture

Glazkov culture is archaeological culture of ancient Tungus racially Mongoloid tribes in the Bronze Age (18th-13th centuries BCE), spread in the Baikal area, who engaged in Hunting, fishery and gathering. The Glazkov Tunguses came to Siberia from the south, displacing Yukagir tribes
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glazkov_culture
Andronovo culture (Ural, Siberia, Mongolia, China 2100BC) (Caucasoid)

Andronovo culture in western Siberia, west Asiatic steppe, Urals, Kazakhstan, emerged from proto-Iranian Poltavka culture in the Volga. The Andronovo were Scythian/Aryan. The Andronovo culture is notable for advanced metallurgy, horse chariots, wheeled vehicles, invention of the spoke-wheeled chariot, animal husbandry. The Andronovo have been described by archaeologists as exhibiting pronounced Europoid features.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andronovo_culture

Elunin/Krotov/Tashkov culture (Siberia 2000 BCE) (new Caucasoid (Andronovo) migrants leading older Mongol-Caucasoid (Afanasevo) hybrids)

Suyarganovo culture (Aral 2000BC) (Caucasoid)


Ordos culture (Mongolia, China 600 BC) (Caucasoid)


The Elunin culture was formed by interaction of Caucasoid (Andronovo) migrants, who brought with them tradition of bronze metallurgy and advanced animal husbandry. Interaction between migrant Caucasoid ethnic groups and indigenous Mongoloid-Caucasoid mixed populations in the frontier, periphery foothills and plains area of the Altai's Upper Ob at the end of the 3rd millennium BCE

The frontier Tashkov culture people were in regular cultural contact with the Andronovo population of the Southern Urals, and they also learned metalworking from Andronovo

Krotov culture is an indigenous 2nd millennium BCE Bronze Age culture of animal breeders in the steppe and forest-steppe area of the Western Siberia Altai mountainous

The tribes of the Elunin/Krotov/Tashkov circle cultures were located in the Altai area steppes, forest-steppes and foothills; the Caucasoids were metallurgists and pastoral animal breeders. They developed entirely new designs of socketed weapons, and art images that included horses, oxen, sheep, camels, and more. The other Mongoloid component was located in the area of the Sayan highlands, where lived populations of the southern zone of East Siberian taiga hunters and fishermen. They belonged to the Glazkov, Shiver, and other cultures around the Baikal and Angara River basin, who mastered bronze casting and the manufacture of flint, jade and bone implements, and produced twin blade knives, scraper knives, and saws; their imagery had snakes, elk, bear, and more. The organic fusion of the Altai (Caucasoid) and Sayan (Mongoloid) components into a single culture is thought to have occurred in the steppe foothills between the Ob and Irtysh rivers.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elunin_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krotov_culture

The Tazabagyab culture - archaeological culture of the Bronze Age (1500 BC), Located on the territory of Aral Sea. Formed from a result of migration tribes of Andronovo culture. It is assumed that the carriers of this culture were the Indo-European herdsmen, who gradually change it on irrigated farming, initiating the agricultural culture of Khwarezm.[1] The population of Tazabagyab culture have an traces of the cult of fire

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tazabagyab_culture
The Ordos culture is known for significant finds of Scythian art and is thought to represent the easternmost extension of Indo-European Eurasian nomads, such as the Scythians

during the Bronze and early Iron Age from the 6th to 2nd centuries BCE.


the art of the Ordos culture appears to have influenced that of the Donghu people (Chinese: 東胡), a Mongolic-speaking nomadic tribe located to the east

The weapons found in tombs throughout the steppes of the Ordos are very close to those of the Scythians, who known on the Asian Steppes as the Saka.[9]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordos_culture

Okunevos were related to Native Americans btw, no one else.
Basically, a bunch of people almost identical to Amerindians fucked over a group of Indo-Europeans and ended up contributing to East Scythians.

Mongolids lived in the periphery of Scythian civilization and learned/adopted the Scythian lifestyle and gradually advanced westwards until they erased Scythians/Tocharians


Mongolids invasion resulted in the rape and genocide of Indo-European peoples living throughout all of central asia and the middle east. Central Asia is now full of mixed race Elliot Rodgers thanks to them.

Why are you refuting genetic studies with archaeology?
East Scythians soaked up Mongoloid admixture like a sponge long before the Turkic language expansion.
Later on there was indeed a switch from Indo-Iranian to Turkic brought forth by conquest but this didn't result in extermination.
Scythians are still ancestral to Turkic people.

eastern scythians were the leaders of various mongoloids. they taught them the scythian way. the mongoloids then usurped them...

if it was the way you say, then scythian whites would be dominant phentotype/genotype throughout east asia

sure scythians fucked a few mongoioid slags, but scythians could not dominate over the mongols for too long and got khan'd by their little students

Problem with your theory is that there's large scale continuity in paternal lines in Central Asia.
It's more like the Khans also had a use for the Scythian males as fighters so they could continue existing and breeding but just had to start speaking Turk.

Problem with your theory is that there's genocidal scale genetic disruption in Central Asia.

the Khans were white Scythian before the Mongoloids took over and destroyed the whites
>The ruler of the Xiongnu was called the Chanyu later refined by Rouran as "Khan"
>The Yenisei Kirghiz Khagans claimed descent from Xiongnu (Chinese Li Ling + daughter of the Xiongnu Khan)
>Xiongnu are Mongoloids
>Xiongnu used Chanyu/Khanyu title synonymous with Khan
>it is suggested that Indo-European Wusun used the royal title "Kunmi"
>Beckwith specifically suggests an Indo-Aryan etymology of the title Kunmi
>IE word Kunmi possibly the root for Khan
>Hun = Khan = Hunnu = Xiongnu = Hunya = Chanyu = Kunmi (similar shit)

>Huns were in fact descendants of the Northern Xiongnu who migrated westward

>the title “Khan“ was original to the Rourans
>The region experienced a Mongolification and was eventually occupied predominantly by peoples showing Mongoloid features, known from their skeletal remains and artifacts

tl;dr Scythians transferred their technology/skills/culture to Mongoloids and then got erased by them
chilll w/ that turanid revisionist crap

this

Xiongnu inhabited the Asian Steppe from the 3rd century BC to the late 1st century AD

Scythians, also known as Scyth, Saka, Sakae, Sacae, Sai, Iskuzai, or Askuzai, were a large group of Iranian[1][2][3][4] Eurasian nomads who were mentioned by the literate peoples surrounding them as inhabiting large areas in the central Eurasian steppes from about the 9th century BC until about the 4th century AD (Sarmatians)
Alans survive to this day
the Xiongnu name could be a cognate of Scythian, Saka and Sogdia, corresponding to a name for Northern Iranians.[24][71] According to Beckwith the Xiongnu could have contained a leading Iranian component when they started out, but more likely they had earlier been subjects of an Iranian people and learned from them the Iranian nomadic model.[24]

In the UNESCO-published History of Civilizations of Central Asia, its editor János Harmatta concludes that the royal tribes and kings of the Xiongnu bore Iranian names, that all Xiongnu words noted by the Chinese can be explained from a Scythian language, and that it is therefore clear that the majority of Hsiung-nu tribes spoke an Eastern Iranian language

Doesn't that make them little bitches who can't fight? The R1a branch of Indo-Europeans always seemed to be a bunch of weak cucks to me. Only the R1b ones achieved anything worth of note.

Look at the nature paper. Pazyryk and other East Scythians were 50% Mongoloid.

Not much of a genocide to turn that into 70% Mongoloid.

weaker, less ruthless, less sadistic, less everything

what dominant group would teach inferiors and uplift them from their primitive ways only to then be replaced by them?

modern r1b not learning from ancient r1a mistakes?

>mixed race Elliot Rodgers thanks to them
More like Turkic Elliot Rodgers replaced Iranic and Yenesian Elliot Rodgers.

More like earlier cultures(Okunev,Karasuk) were already a mix of West(Yamna related) and East Eurasian lineages(Ket/Nganasan related).

Pazyrk Sycthians got their East Eurasian component from a distinct Evenk like population.

>Scythians are still ancestral to Turkic people.
While there's some population continuity Turkic speakers have additional East Eurasian autosomal components related to Buryats.

again you are jumping to conclusions without comprehending the history

repeat the eastern scythians led groups of inferior mongoloids, in the beginning the scythians were the dominant majority, they were later fucked up royally by mongoloids

so yes later on they become primarily mongoloid

if scythians retained dominance it would be the other way and mongoloids would become bleached

instead entire asia become khan'd

what dont you understand?

read the entire thread over very carefully til it makes sense

You're not making any fucking sense.
East Scythians interacted with some obscure groups of Siberian and Altai tribes, not Asians in general.
They mixed with these tribes for whatever reason and became a bunch of Elliots.
It's like Jews in Europe acquiring European admixture while retaining their culture.

He's a stormnigger that spams the same quotations from Wikipedia whenever there's a thread on Central Asia.