The United States was founded on diversi-

>The United States was founded on diversi-

I don't think anyone has said it was founded on diversity, most people acknowledge that the natives and slaves were treated poorly for up until like 100 years, Irish were treated like shit in the 1800s, Italians were treated like shit in the early 1900s IIRC

The whole diversity thing, in the US and in general, has been a very recent thing
Also Pic related echos the same-ish sentiment as your pic OP

Chaos is founded upon diversity. The motto of the US is e pluribus unum: out of many, one.

The opposite of "diversity".

Neither are we a "nation of immigrants", as every single nation on earth is as such. The US is a nation of laws.

Nobody likes John Jay anyways. Too stupid to come up with something as brilliant as Judicial Review like Marshall, such a poor negotiator that the best he could do when trying to get British troops off of US clay was get the same fucking deal we'd already negotiated for at Paris, and had to be hard carried during the writing of the Federalist papers by Hamilton and Madison, who wrote 51 and 29 essays to his 5.

That isn't even an accurate assessment of the US at the revolution

Why was Teddy so based?

>says that the only true Murikan language is English
>English has never been an official language
>there have been presidents who didn't speak it as their first language

what did Teddy mean by this.

>there have been presidents who didn't speak it as their first language
Were there any others besides Van Buren?

He's the only confirmed one.

Why do Americans claim that America is diverse when:
>everyone speaks English and it's the official language everywhere (locally)
>everyone embraces anglo culture
>no political regional parties
>the only diversity is along racial lines

It's a segement of the population that claims that America is diverse, as to your statement about racial diversity, in America that is exactly what they mean. The nation (really the urban areas) are racially diverse. It's simply a misconstrued and overly sanitized idea of what diversity is.

Various ethnicities, and culturally different like food kek, especially were I live. It's funny how my state is "diverse," yet there are few racial tensions. It appears most tensions are in far more 'liberal' states.

>12% of the country speaks Spanish at home
>5% speak another Indo-European language
>3% speak an Asian language
>50 million people here were not born here >20% of the world's TOTAL immigrants while holding 5% of the world's TOTAL population
>formally dominant Anglo-Saxon culture has absorbed several elements from immigrant cultures
>very distinct regional cultures that are usually blends of other cultures
>has large groups of some groups that are basically extinct in most of the rest of the world like Jews

It's marxist revisionism.

the romanticized immigration era in the late 19th and early 20th century. was when we were taking in almost exclusively europeans. Even then the WASPs were still biased as fuck against them. Because they were catholic, orthodox, jew, or not lily white anglo saxons.

>like jew

Judaism is just a prank desu. It's not a real identity.

There are no objective standards to identifying as a jew.

>same
>same
>same
>same

I thought capitalists were supposed to be individualists

Ashkenazi blood is something that can and has been easily identified.

Funny, in the 1700s it was Germans flooding into the US. You don't make a country for one people and then immediately let it thousands of sausage eating rome-killers.

then let in every other ethnic groups over the course of 200 years.

So yeah, even if America wasn't founded on diversity, the founding Fathers themselves saw the united states become diverse on day fucking one.

until political correctness was thought up and entered the mainstream in the late 20th century, all immigrants did their best to assimilate into the native anglo culture.

barring some small regional pockets of french and chinese.

culture is a pretty important indicater

>Ashkenazi

European atheists to a large degree.

Here is your 'jewish woman from the middle-east who has biblical claim upon land there'.

Funny, she looks like any other European atheist to me.

Germans didn't destroy Rome, Eastern Germanics did. Germans are Western Germanic.

She does look middle eastern to me.

at least post a better jew.

Silverman could pass as a Mizrahi, if she tanned.

>bitching about political correctness.

lel

>We middle easterners nao
>despite having spent a thousand years bumming around Europe
>I'm a secular jew lol
>what does that mean?
>nothing hahaha

kek entire cities spoke German as their first language at the start of the 20th century. It was the second most spoken language in the country. This only changed after WW1 kicked anti-German sentiment into high gear.

t. Jew butthurt people don't see him as white

Look at this middle eastern man right here.

Don't you wish you were middle-eastern like he is?

Pennsyvania and the plains states.

Pennsylvania was germanic before the revolution.

George Carlin warned us. He said it would be the new tool of the fascist.

Except when people are accusing him of having white privilege of course

And the Founders had a right to worry about the Germans. If the Germans flooded this country and completely replaced the Anglos, America would be eating saurkraut and managing to destroy Europe somehow today (Oh wait...)
It's the same with Hispanics, if they become a huge portion of the USA (which they are projected to be), you bet your ass that large portions of the USA are going to convert to Latino culture. Culture is tied to a people, when the people are gone, the culture becomes nothing more than an oddity to the new inhabitants of the land. This can be seen with the Injun cultures.

>Pennsylvania was germanic before the revolution.

Germans were only 8% of the white US population and 6.4% of the overall population (~253,000 people) in the 1790 census, which was probably a larger share than they were before the Revolution.

>German and Germanic are synonyms
Leave right this second

It is ironic though, because people who criticize political correctness are often people who are getting offended at what somebody else is saying. There is a difference between criticizing political correctness, and doing so in order to enact your own political correctness code.

Talk about retards and in front of Sarah Palin, see what happens.

Why didn't OP finish his sentence?

>The United States was not founded on diversity.
>Ruled by the British. Which is consisted of 4 distinct cultures.
>And Britain's German subjects.
>And the shit they stole from France.
K.

>Quote made before the Louisiana Purchase
>Quote made before Mexican territory broke free and joined the unites states
You are basically advocating that the original 13 states should break free from the US.

Out-of-context quotes are the troll's favorite weapon.

except, you know, the fact that america's religious landscape was ridiculously diverse. then there's the fact that there were extensive settlemens of scotch irish in pennslyvania and the appalachian regions, germans in pennslyvania, dutch in upstate newyork, swedes and finns in delaware, free blacks and slaves (many free blacks in the NE being allowed to vote before the 1810s and 20s), and a handful of different ethnicities who settled in georgia and south carolina. jews weren't numerous but they were also present too. tldr you're retarded OP

this

I may look white but there's something different

>The US is a nation of laws.
Pfft, no it isn't. The US was founded on the breaking of laws and many of its heroes either skirted around the law or out and out broke it without giving a single fuck.

The US is a nation of small government.

>america's religious landscape was ridiculously diverse
>370 flavors of Christ

Sounds like a like to dupe idiots with

>The US is a nation of small government.

Tell that to the whiskey rebellion.

yes, is that not diverse?

look, it won't do any good to fray the edges of our fledgling republic, their armed protest was always a folly

Most governments would have chimped out on the rebels.

/thread

...

>Same ancestors
By this logic Dutch and English only. So fuck the French, Germans, Irish and everyone else that came after.
>same religion
Except like half of the founding father were deists
>same principles of government
What was the whole Federalist vs antifederalist argument about then? Also what happened to the articles of confederation?
>similar manners and customs
No clue what he's even getting at.