>we must free europe from nazi oppression
>yeah lets give half of europe to the soviets
We must free europe from nazi oppression
Asher Ward
Other urls found in this thread:
independent.co.uk
bbc.com
bigbrowser.blog.lemonde.fr
en.wikipedia.org
20minutes.fr
spire.sciencespo.fr
twitter.com
Jonathan Harris
The soviets did the vast majority of dying against Nazis so they deserved the lands they got.
Ian Scott
>we suck at war and deserve to be rewarded for it
Logan Wilson
The Soviets deserved it having fought the hardest and killing the vast majority of the Wehrmacht.
Mason Phillips
>give half of europe to the soviets
What do you mean 'give'?
The Soviet's armies already occupied that territory and they weren't amenable to giving it up just because the West asked. The only way the Soviets would have given it up was for them to be violently removed through total-war, a war that would have undoubtedly cost more lives than the entirely European campaign the US/UK had just completed and had uncertain prospects for success.
Your question is essentially: why did the US not throw itself into a war more terrible than the one they had just finished for the sake of several Eastern European countries whose importance to the US & its interests was slight.
Jeremiah Rogers
So in other words, the allies were on the wrong side.
Jacob Phillips
the soviets knew how to kill nazi scum
Lincoln Ramirez
The Nazis would have been worse and a more dangerous threat in the long run, with control over all of Europe and Russia
Both morally and pragmatically we picked the correct side. Sacrificing Eastern Europe to the bolshevik for 50 years was the price we had to pay.
James Miller
On the other hand, the KGB did a pretty bang-up job at rotting away western civilization from the inside out and the world lived in constant fear of a nuclear exchange for almost fifty years.
Daniel Ortiz
Many communist militias got power after the war
Colton Richardson
>the soviets knew how to kill nazi scum
Jordan Kelly
>alt right acts tough on the internet
>get stomped by so-called cucks and pacifist lefties in real life
lol stop posturing you alt white shitstain
Logan Taylor
>the KGB did a pretty bang-up job at rotting away western civilization
[citation needed]
Tyler Bailey
Nazis watch out
Brandon Howard
They conquered those lands at the cost of millions of lives. They weren't "given" to them.
Adrian Brown
>germany and russia ally to grab a bunch of land in europe
>germany and russia plot to backstab eachother simultaneously to take even more than they agreed
>russia comes out on top
Oh yeah, they totally deserved it
Alexander Robinson
>don't you see we're fighting the soviets
>why aren't you helping?
>how could our brilliant diplomacy have led to this
>it's all a conspiracy! fucking jews! japan pls help
Carter Bell
>KBG rotted western civilization
No need to fear, the CIA did it for us with promoting modern art.
independent.co.uk
The KGB's ability to influence the US was always laughably small outside of /pol/ memes.
>Constant fear of a nuclear exchange
And you think the same wouldn't have happened if the Nazis won?
Nathaniel Thompson
>citing clickbait site owned by russian oligarchs talking about cia in order to defend the kgb
comrade, i...
Oliver Cook
>Give
The Soviets steamrolled Eastern Europe and took it themselves as they chased Fritz back to Berlin.
Jayden Garcia
Aiden Thomas
>germany starts grabbing land in europe
>soviets make a deal to keep german agression away from them
>germans later break the agreement
Thomas Morgan
At least use webarchive if you want to dump 10 weblinks at once like a retard.
Carson Green
The soviets knew how to kill themselves more than anything else to be honest. If they put half their ferocity and cold detachment to the value of human life into building a productive industrial economy later on maybe marxist-leninism today wouldn't be seen as a niche ideology followed exclusively by imbeciles.
Aiden Sanchez
Ally with lesser evil against bigger evil and once bigger evil is destroyed, destroy the lesser evil.
Not a very complicated strategy
Luis Gutierrez
Why do anti white cucks think their tough?
Daniel Adams
Not an argument.
James Collins
A war would have been too costly.
Although it would have resulted in a better world today, but at a high cost.
>deserved it
Idiot detected. Did Nazi Germany "deserve" France, Denmark and Norway? The EXACT SAME THING happened in Eastern Europe. The Soviets were just as bad as the nazis, and for the average person, they were MUCH worser. Nobody saw the jews or roma being killed. But you do see your friends and family being killed and violently deported. You do see your farm being taken away. You do see economic stagnation and loss of freedom.
Idiotic US teens that know nothing about WW2 shouldn't say anything about it.
Ryan Gutierrez
Of course not retard, it was a suggestion. A wasted one, but that's my fault not yours. Pearls to pigs.
Leo White
>Did Nazi Germany "deserve" France, Denmark and Norway?
Nice Strawman. The soviets deserved it in the sense they were entitled to most of the spoils as they damaged the Nazis the most. Morality isn't part of the question.
Jeremiah Moore
These are Slavs, don't put yourself into their glory.
John Davis
>The Soviets were just as bad as the nazis, and for the average person, they were MUCH worser
>Call other people idiots
"Worser" is just cherry on the top of your ignorance.
Blake Martinez
How so? Refute that first point, please.
What fucking spoils?
Benjamin Wright
To add to that 2nd point: The soviets only ""deserved"" East Prussia and the parts of Germany now in Poland. This was fair game. The rest, no. Just an imperialistic power conquering territory from another imperialistic power.
Henry Barnes
>What fucking spoils?
Land.
We're not discussing morality. Stop trying to move the topic to whether the Soviets 'Morally' deserved that land. They deserved it because they fought the hardest. it's that simple.
Asher Sullivan
Why shouldn't you discuss morality though?
The word "deserve" implies morality.
The people who lived there deserved that land.
And the Soviets did not fight the hardest to defend e.g Estonia. Estonians did.
Michael Powell
>Why shouldn't you discuss morality though?
Because your OP discusses it from the point of view of the allies. The allies had no choice but to give the soviets Eastern Europe as the USSR had fought the hardest.
How retarded would Churchill and Roosevelt have looked at Yalta if they said 'We WOULD give you your fair share but communism is evil!!!!'
Nathaniel Mitchell
Sure.
But the allies did think about attacking the soviets and freeing Europe. But it would have been too costly, and they didn't have enough nukes.
Carson Russell
>But the allies did think about attacking the soviets and freeing Europe. But it would have been too costly, and they didn't have enough nukes.
You've just answered your own question in the OP.
Jackson James
It's called the Western betrayal of Eastern Europe.
I doubt the US and France/UK had the support of their people to go on another war to actually liberate Eastern Europe from the Soviets.
The alternative was allowing Germany to control the whole continent (inb4 the USSR would have won the war even without the help of the Brits and Americans).
Jace Phillips
That wasn't my question, but yes.
David Hughes
>yeah lets give half of europe to the soviets
>But the allies did think about attacking the soviets and freeing Europe. But it would have been too costly, and they didn't have enough nukes.
Literally the question and answer
Wyatt Anderson
Yes, but I didn't ask the question.
Parker Fisher
>not opening the second front on the Balkans instead of Italy in 1943
>not cutting off the Soviet advance and the ability to claim the Balkans and Central Europe
Just my 20 armchair general cents
William Morgan
>TRASHCANS WATCH OUT
Julian Sanchez
>leftists actually believe this
antifag detected.
did you know.
that the fasces is a faggot?
Homophobe. Literally defending gaybashing, how pathetic.
Wyatt Sanders
>Refute that first point, please.
I didn't talked about first point. I just pointed out you've claimed that for average person economic stagnation and nationalization were somehow worse than genocide.
Michael Turner
Yes.
Normal people didn't notice the genocide at all. Jews and Gypsies were small minorities.
Benjamin Collins
The west didn't have a say in the matter, Soviets would have kicked them out of the continent within the year, allied forces in Europe were outnumbered 4:1 and had half as many
Isaiah Campbell
>Jews and Gypsies were small minorities.
What about Slavs (Bela/Malo/Russians, Poles, Czechs, Serbs) though, were they minorities too?
Leo Clark
>get stomped by so-called cucks and pacifist lefties in real life
LMAO
Ryan Foster
>allied forces in Europe were outnumbered 4:1
>muh tanks
irrelevant, Soviet supply lines were completely fucked. Western powers would have had completely uncontested naval and air superiority, not to mention the atom bomb. Patton was right.
What the West didn't have was popular support, their civilians were war weary af. That doesn't matter to Soviets.
Aiden Mitchell
*blocks your path*
Ryder Evans
>14 million minorities dying is less noticeable than 14 million whites dying
Autistic people should not be raised by racists
Julian Reed
Krauts are losers.
Chase Scott
Great job putting things that didn't happen in greentext.
The non-aggression pact pre-dated the war and included plans to carve up eastern europe between them. Sorry slavboo, they were right cunts and instrumental in the starting of ww2.
They also both entered planning phases for backstabbing eachother the same exact month, set to go off on a similar timeframe. Germans ultimately moved first, they were also right cunts, but the treaty was going in the dumpster either way.
James Roberts
But they treated the people in those territories worse than the Nazis, unless you were Jewish, being under Nazi control was better than under the Soviet Iron Fist.