If the Axis won WW2, which parts of the world would be better than they are now? Which parts would be worse?
If the Axis won WW2, which parts of the world would be better than they are now? Which parts would be worse?
Angel King
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Daniel Bell
>Better
Eastern Europe
>Worse
Everywhere else
Easton Morgan
Better: Germany (rules a giant empire), Japan (same reason) Eastern Europe (no communism), maybe Africa (European countries still in control, less war and desease)
Worse: America (no post-war boom, no global hegemony), Maybe China
About the same: Western Europe, South America
Owen Ramirez
Germany, Japan.
Most of Eastern Europe, in the sense that it would be a part of Germany, however that doesn't apply to the people who lived there before the war, but to the German colonizers. So, the place would be better off because of no communism, but the people would be killed/displaced/enslaved
Brayden Torres
Like hell would Eastern Europe be better. I am speaking it as a Pole. Communism might not be the best thing overall but Poles were the next group after Jews to make room for the lebensraum.
Aaron Myers
/thread
Turning E. Europe into lebensraum would have interesting
Adrian Morales
>The people of eastern europe would all be killed or displaced
Why does this myth never die?
The German colonist ought to live on handsome, spacious farms. The German services will be lodged in marvellous buildings, the governors in palaces. Beneath the shelter of the administrative services, we shall gradually organise all that is indispensable to the maintenance of a certain standard of living. Around the city, to a depth of thirty to forty kilometres, we shall have a belt of handsome villages connected by the best roads. What exists beyond that will be another world, in which we mean to let the Russians live as they like. It is merely necessary that we should rule them. In the event of a revolution, we shall only have to drop a few bombs on their cities, and the affair will be liquidated. Once a year we shall lead a troop of Kirghizes through the capital of the Reich, in order to strike their imaginations with the size of our monuments. What India was for England, the territories of Russia will be for us.
Hitler's Table Talk 1941
Gavin Jenkins
>no communism
So being murdered by nazis is better than living under communism?
Lucas Powell
see
Nolan Nelson
Nazi's allied with plenty of Eastern Europeans.
Brody Murphy
That's not even close to being the truth. Generalplan Ost included:
>The plan entailed the enslavement, expulsion, and mass murder of most Slavic peoples in Europe along with planned destruction of their nations, whom the 'Aryan' Nazis viewed as racially inferior.
>Himmler stated openly: "It is a question of existence, thus it will be a racial struggle of pitiless severity, in the course of which 20 to 30 million Slavs and Jews will perish through military actions and crises of food supply."
>As of June 1941, the policy envisaged the deportation of 31 million Slavs to Siberia
All links and more info are in the Wiki article
Jose Baker
Generalplan Ost was about as realistic as the Morgenthau Plan. Actually trying to implement something like that would be retarded.
Dylan Rivera
Yes, it was retarded. Most of the Reich's plans were, in fact, pretty fucking retarded.
Nicholas Smith
>Actually trying to implement something like that would be retarded
That about sums up the 3rd Reich.
Blake Martinez
>All these people saying Eastern Europe would be better
I guess there are a lot of autistic people who can ignore the massive genocide
Kevin Gray
Most, if not all of warring nations had Plans like that and none of them decided to go through with it. Why would the Reich be any different?
Zachary Phillips
Because they were already liquidating Jews, Romani, political dissidents, and Slavic POWs, and continued to make this a top priority even when losing on all fronts in '44. Fascism in the entropy stage is a hell of a drug.
Jeremiah Peterson
>If the Axis won WW2, which parts of the world would be better than they are now?
I can't really think of anywhere.
>Which parts would be worse?
Most especially Europe, centered around Germany itself, which would almost certainly be repeatedly nuked before the Western Allies give it up as a bad job.
Ryan Brown
All parts would be worse, because the axis had terribly unscientific ideas about agriculture. Everyone would be hungry right now.
Carter Martin
Wouldn't China just be a Japanese colony most likely
Lucas Rodriguez
if by Eastern Europe you are also saying Balkan region then yeah for sure. If not then probably Balkan region would be a booming metropolis.
Adrian Collins
south America might be even better considering the years of Communism setting them back a decade and a half or so.
Brody Murphy
Australia would presumably have fallen to the imperial Japanese army (major cities at least). Anglo-Australians would have become slaves and comfort women to the new Japanese overlords, unless Hitler relented and allowed them safe passage and resettlement in UK/Europe (doubtful)
Wyatt Myers
"no".