christcucks are so insecure about their bullshit religion that the only response they can give fedora memes.
If you say something thought out and reasonable they will just get emotional or say a shitty meme because of their lack of debate skills, it must be hard not having facts on yourside
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
strangenotions.com
reasons.org
crisismagazine.com
letusreason.org
edwardfeser.blogspot.ca
twitter.com
>there are people who make up and take a shit with this view
fucking rich people reeeeee
*tips*
I don't know why you'd actually want to live on a polluted pile of concrete covered in assholes.
t. r3ddit
Take your fedora and fuck off back to r2.71ddit, cunt
proving my point much.
How insecure you must be to be incapable of rationally defending your beliefs. Its kind of sad really.
>Worst Objection to Theism: Who Created God?
youtube.com
>Digital Physics Argument for God's Existence
youtube.com
>The Leibnizian Cosmological Argument
youtube.com
>Quantum Physics Debunks Materialism
youtube.com
>The Introspective Argument
youtube.com
>The Teleological Argument
youtube.com
>What Atheists Confuse
Part 1 youtube.com
Part 2 youtube.com
>Is Atheism a Delusion?
Part 1 youtube.com
Part 2 youtube.com
>Atheists Don't Exist
youtube.com
strangenotions.com
reasons.org
crisismagazine.com
letusreason.org
...
>gets called out for not having facts
>cites zero (0) facts in his defence
Hahaha you "people" really are pathetic!
pretty sure he posted mountains of facts
atheists can only shitpost, because you have no facts
>god is provable by science
go to Veeky Forums if you want to debate this trash
Meanwhile fedoras are so insecure abut their lack of religion, they apparently spend every waking moment obsessed with religion.
They're joking, you autist.
> Atheism is provable by science
Atheism is a metaphysical argument about the nature of the universe
Inb4 "it's just a lack of belief", that's agnosticism
Inb4 "ur an atheist but I go one God further!", this is a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of God.
edwardfeser.blogspot.ca
TL;dr God is not to be thought of as an anthropomorphic superhuman like Zeus or Thor, but pure actuality - the universal entity through which all things came
That's a nice notion but it still remains entirely inconsistent with reality.
>atheist
>thought out and reasonable
If that was true, you'd be a Christian
Depends on what you want to discuss about.
How so? And I challenge you to not use the term "sky-daddy" in your answer. Scientific truth isn't the same as metaphysical truth, science is a tool that answers the "how" question and metaphysics answers the "why" question
Basically what I mean is that the claim that the abrahamic god is not comparable to the deities of other previous cultures because "he" is fundamentally different and represents the essense of divine traits instead of actually displaying those traits is a meaningless exercise in theological semantics. The author doesn't provide reason for his assertion to even be true aside from his claim that prominent theologians and philosphers tend to be more comfortable with this model, which is obvious as it places the idea of god conveniently out of range of any scientific criticism and still, even fully granting him his argument, leaves his idea of god helplessly in the realm of deism and far removed from any god represented by christianity, judaism, or islam. Sorry if any of that is unclear, let me know if I can elaborate.
>in the realm of deism
Actually, the God of theologians of the Catholic Church is always and actively sustaining the world. But it is still an irrelevant God.
>there are people out there who unironically think like this
The world is a strange place