Why was civilization basically invented by middle easterners? Why have the mayority of europeans near eastern DNA...

This

What?

Because Noah's ark landed in Ararat, modern-day Turkey.

The first urban settlements was in Mesopotamia, Babylon.

I was expecting /his to be made up of scholarly and well mediated debate since /pol exists for all these edgy politically incorrect posts, but /his seems more like what /pol should be desu.

Epic.

>Why was civilization basically invented by middle easterners?
the fertile crescent was one of the most ideal locations in the entire world to start agriculture and civilization
>Why have the mayority of europeans near eastern DNA?
because your unsourced picture says so
>Why is the latin and greek alphabet ultimately derived from the phoenician one?
because the phoenicians were onto something good with a nice, standardized alphabet
>Why do europeans use middle eastern time measurements?
because their system was a good idea to begin with
>Why was agriculture introduced to europe from the middle east?
because the soil and climate was better for farming
>Why did the latins and greeks feel closer to MENA than to other europeans?
they were actually frequently in contact and traded with the remnants of said civilizations while the bulk of europe was far away behind mountains and thick forests
>Why is Aviccena, a Persian, considered the father of modern medicine?
he had access to a lot of preserved greek texts

That map isn't accurate, copper was extracted and worked in Sardinia since the early 4th millenium bc

why not?

MENA is white it was all an exchange between similiar people

China in the Bronze Age had developed a civilization administered by a powerful bureaucracy through the use of writing independent of the Middle Eastern civilizations.

Middle Easterners have more neurotic personalities.
Neuroticism drives progress but only under certain conditions.

If you think about all the constructor cultures whether in Egypt or Stonehenge, what they did wasn't logical at all. They were putting massive amounts of resources in something useless.
If it was one person doing it, it could be dismissed as autism but it was entire ethnicities working together to create useless monuments.

It seems that way becuse the roman empire s well as catholicism wiped out most of native civilizations on 3 continents. Middle East barely contains any traces of civilization these days.

You must be new.

Im under the impression tha modern euros basically derive their entire heritage from the middle east/anatolia and the russian steppes region, ie theyre hardly actual europeans

people have always been moving in and out so im not sure european even means anything other than you just livw live on that peninsula. my only interest in this is that fact that im from spain where the original modern western euros lived, but meh

Russian steppe folks still had Euro DNA of an eastern type, as they were descendants native Eastern European males who intermarried with Caucasus women(who themselves had some genetic components related to Europeans).

It doesn't matter that the old mesolithic natives of Western Europe didn't contribute much since they were weaklings who couldn't get anything done by themselves.
They didn't deserve Europe so the betters took it and thus deserve it.

That makes no sense what so ever

Pretty much this

Whites love to crow about how they invented everythig, when in reality they just stole everything from the Middle East.

"middle easterners" is about as precise term as "asians".

Most of the shit you mention comes from ancient Mesopotamia, which has nothing to do with the later sandnigges that nigged the region up with their moon religion.

>Why is Aviccena, a Persian, considered the father of modern medicine?
thats not how you write pascal or semmelweiss.
>What about modern historiography and sociology?
marx, weber, durkheim.

t. shitskin

t. skincancer

Because the Middle East was settled much earlier and had a much more favourable climate than Europe.
Also ancient civilizations constantly copied each others advances and since the first great civilizations appered in the middle eastern area a lot can be traced back to them.

Isn't it amazing how environment as a huge factor in civilization always gets denied in Africa in order to say that sub-Saharans are dumb, but somehow this same logic is never applied to Middle-easterners and their European cousins. Why couldn't Europeans build civilizations and societies without Middle-Eastern farmers immigrating and subjugating them? All because of environment somehow, despite the fact that Europe is far more fertile and suitable to agriculture. Why couldn't the Europeans domesticate sheep, goats, and cows and start pastoralism, but Middle-Eastern people did? All environment and totally not intelligence related! Why is it, that not one blue eyed, blonde haired European is named or recorded by 1000 BCE, yet thousands of people from modern-day Iraq alone are. How come Mesopotamia, Levant, Egypt, Iran, Indus Valley were all peopled and founded by Middle-eastern people and were the only civilizations for much of their time period? Even the earliest "European" civilizations, were founded by Middle-easterners: Nuragic, Minoan, Etruscan, etc.

It gets even better with ideas of the Middle-East, North Africa, and Central Asia all being white. Yes, somehow white people simultaneously built and conquered those civilizations, but somehow still lived in mudhuts and dysentery in their indigenous land.

This is only true in terms of Y-DNA from Central Asian pastoralists and Mesopotamian/Levant agriculturists. Majority of European DNA, especially mtDNA, is native Mesolithic stock, hence blonde hair and blue eyes.

European neolithic farmers trace their heritage only from Anatolian ones, Who were genetically very different from the Levantine ones, Who were in turn different from the Mesopotamian ones

The Near East became very similar genetically during the Copper Age. Mesopotamians cucked everyone with their superior technology.

>Mesopotamians

More like Semitic and Caucasus tribes

It was mostly their aggressive genetics responsible for the homogenization. Copper is shit anyway and very easy to adopt.

Srebrenica was just gene expression by Middle Eastern Serbs.

Caucasus is quite distant from the Near East. Copper Age Anatolians cluster close to the Near East and South Europe. There was a massive genetic shift there.

Yes, shift towards the Caucasus and also maybe Bedouins a bit.
You can see it yourself by drawing a line.

Civilized Mesopotamians didn't do anything. It was all barbarian tribes looking for villages to destroy. These barbarians themselves would get smashed by the Hittites changing the genetic pool of Anatolia even further.

the only area where muslims hold innovative command is mass scale rape and barbarity

>Civilized Mesopotamians

*Ahem*

Have you ever read anything about Assyria? You can be civilized and warlike at the same time.

Assyrians were a Semitic people and thus unrelated to the CHG at least originally originally. Modern day Semites are shifted towards CHG although to a lesser degree than more eastern and northern ME people.

Ethiopians don't carry CHG type of DNA, only ENF. Sardinians are a working proxy for their Afro-Asiatic ancestry.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hattians

These guys weren't Semitic or Mesopotamian.

How do you explain modern people from the Caucasus being distant from the Copper Age Anatolians?

Only that that matters that the copper age Anatolian is on a line from EN Anatolian and CHG.
Modern day Caucasians are irrelevant. Most of them have Indo-European or Turkic admixture which causes a shift away from the original CHG.

The fuck happened during the copper age in Anatolia?

The farmers from there that served as a vector to bring agriculture into Europe earlier on seem to have gotten genocided by someone.

>The Hattians spoke Hattic, a non-Indo-European language of uncertain affiliation. Hattic is now believed by some scholars to be related to the Northwest Caucasian language group.

Of course it wasn't just them. Probably numerous tribes all looking for easier targets when things were getting too rough back at the Caucasus.

So they got cucked by the Hattics who got cucked by the Hittites?

Hittites didn't alter their genepool very much. They just brought a different language. What happened during the Copper Age was a fucking full-scale genocide.

What the fuck... I wonder how it went down

>not putting the highest percentages on the top

why tho?

Not really. Turks still have high haplotype sharing with ENF(but low state similarity because of mixing with CHG, Turco-Mongols etc).

Anatolian women always spread their legs to the new invaders so there's still some genetic continuity there.

I see Turks clustering right next to Near Easterners right there, not anywhere Sardinians. What's your point? Sardinians are the closest people to the early farmers from Anatolia.

It's not a genetic map. There's no clustering.
It's about overall genetic similarity vs. shared haplotypes which signify relatedness.

Clustering with them in the sense that they share roughly the same amount of ENF ancestry with Near Easterners, i.e not much.

Nope. They have East Asian admixture from their Turco-Mongol ancestors and without it their IBS(and haplotype sharing to a much lesser extent) would be higher.

Trying to argue that CHG replaced ANF completely is absurd since Copper age clusters halfway between CHG and ANF.
Anatolian women spread their legs to invaders.

Well, it still clusters pretty far away from the original farmers. There was still a genocide.