Upon his death Prasutagus left his kingdom to be shared by his two daughters and the new Roman emperor, Nero...

>Upon his death Prasutagus left his kingdom to be shared by his two daughters and the new Roman emperor, Nero, believing that this would ensure tranquility for his family and kingdom. Roman law, however, did not allow royal inheritance to be passed to daughters, and co-ownership of a kingdom with a woman was unacceptable according to Roman standards. Kinsmen of the royal house were enslaved. Boudicca was flogged and then forced to witness the public rape and torture of her two daughters, who were believed to have been roughly 12 years old at the time of the rebellion.

Were Romans completely fucking evil?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=M8reIa71Bpw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

the weak should fear the strong

So strong, gang-raping defenseless twelve year old girls.

>ally with the Romans
>the second you die they steal your land and rape your daughters

Spartacus, the Gauls, the Iceni, Zealots and Barbarians did nothing wrong.

>"But Jesus Christ wasn't important as people say he was guys...."

More like
>Leave kingdom to two daughters and insane emperor of rome
>wtf why is he doing this

What are you trying to say?

The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.

should we remind people what Constantine did to his family? people are just wierd

That is how we should treat modern feminism and strong womyn supporters

rape their children? I mean xer children

I'm saying that "Western" morality, as modern academia calls it originates and is based upon Christian metaphysics, and that women rights and minority/weak groups would be abused, like they were in the rest of the world, without it as its foundation.

youtube.com/watch?v=M8reIa71Bpw

Nero treated Barbarians better than Romans
>throws a massive party for the King of Armenia he decided to crown
>gives "freedom" and tax immunity to the Greeks
>beloved by the Persians, so much so that Romans were waiting for him to return with their aid after his "death"

Where was the Roman's swift karmic justice?

That post needs its own fedora.

Great post xD

Yeah, because raping little girls is a sign of strength. Fucking psychopath

>Were Romans completely fucking evil?
Romans were the ottomans of their era, the only difference is that they asimilated their subjects, so the sons and daughters of the people they raped/enslaved/butchered worship them now.

When women speak up, it is custom to silence them, sending a clear-cut message is of vital importance, or the woman will abuse that weakness and rebel.

If you're not being ironic then you should be locked up.

All people are evil.
The Romans were people.

Therefore the Romans were evil.

>Were Romans completely fucking evil?
Yes

>Spartacus
Killing romans isn't wrong we have already established they were completely fucking evil.

I assume that user meant "When speak up, it is custom to silence them."

Probably Syrian Romans

I generally don't see that as a justification for child rape though

This thread is proof that "alt-right" is not real conservative, just bunch of sad angry faggots
What happen to chivalry? honour? faith?
Pathetic

There are a million atrocities and misdeeds that have been committed on a daily basis since the dawn of humanity, child rape is one of the tamer things, nothing worth flipping a tit over.

>There are a million atrocities and misdeeds that have been committed on a daily basis since the dawn of humanity
This. Even right now ISIS is probably doing similar things to civilians and enemies.

>There are a million atrocities and misdeeds that have been committed on a daily basis since the dawn of humanity

I imagine you classify your mum throwing your jizzrag out yesterday as one of them

Yes.

It ended up biting them in the arse eventually though.

>officials under the command of Lupicinus, simply sold off much of the food before it reached the hands of the Goths. Desperate, Gothic families sold many of their children into slavery to Romans for dog meat at the price of one child per one dog. This treatment caused the Therving Goths to grow rebellious and Lupicinus decided to move them south to Marcianople, his regional headquarters. To guard the march south, Lupicinus was forced to pull out the Roman troops guarding the Danube, which allowed the Greuthungi promptly to cross into Roman territory. The Thervings then deliberately slowed their march to allow the Greuthungi to catch up. As the Thervings neared Marcianople, Lupicinus invited Fritigern, Alavivus and a small group of their attendants to dine with him inside the city. The bulk of the Goths were encamped some distance outside, with Roman troops between them and the city. Due to the persistent refusal of the Roman soldiers to allow the Goths to buy supplies in the town's market, fighting broke out and several Roman soldiers were killed and robbed. Lupicinus, having received the news as he sat at the banquet with the Gothic leaders, responded by ordering the executions of Fritgern's and Alavivus' attendants and holding the leaders hostage. This was done in secret but news of the killings came to the Goths outside and they prepared to assault Marcianople.

>the Gothic War changed the way the Roman Empire dealt with barbarian peoples, both without and within. The Therving Goths would now be able to negotiate their position with Rome, with force if necessary, as a unified people inside the borders of the Empire and would transform themselves into the Visigoths. At times they would act as friends and allies to the Romans, at other times as enemies. This change in Rome's relationship with barbarians would lead to the sack of Rome in 410.