Celt vs Samurai

Who would win?

Which kind of samurai and Celt? Assuming you mean Gallic Campaign-era Celtic Warrior vs a Sengoku era Samurai, the samurai would most likely wipe the floor with your random warrior through superior equipment and training, though it is worth noting Japs were ultra manlets at this period, so if the Celt manages to get him in a grapple he can probably rip his head off.

The Jews

>Who would win.
The world.

Obviously the Celt


Celt doesn't fear death and would assufuck the little chink manlet

he would first run towards him, then block the saber with his world, and once it reach close-combat it would literally dismember him with his bar hand.

>with his world
with his sword
>with his bar hand.
ith his bare hands

I liked world better

Considering the Samurai had guns at their peak, going to go with them.

ZA WOARLDU!

Considering that by 1600ad the bio were using Celt levels of metal working I don't know man...

Which Celts? The Gauls and Galatians were Roman-tier in terms of advancement while the Picts were basically cavemen.

>The picts were cavemen

Hooom... no

Celtiberian? Falcatas, iron chainmail, javelin scutarii shield ?

Let's assume we've got a Gallic nobleman from around 100BC and a Sengoku-period Samurai, both on foot and equipped for melee combat only.

Celt:
-Sword
-Oval shield
-Spear
-Mail shirt
-Agen helmet
-Some sort of dagger
(basically the left guy in this image)

Samurai:
-Regular armour for the period
-Katana
-Wakizashi
-Yari
-Some sort of dagger

Both are said to have been extremely skilled fighters. The obvious advantage for the Samurai is that his armour has far greater coverage, although the oval shield is large and effective. While of course hard, it wouldn't be impossible for the Celt to thrust into the weak points of the Samurai's armour.

I think the Samurai would have an overall advantage, but credit where it's due, the Celt wouldn't be fully fucked either. If a weapon gets stuck in his shield, he'll gain temporary control over it and get a good opportunity to hit the Samurai. Their spears would give them roughly equal reach, although the Samurai's two-handed one would be more agile.
One possible solution for the Celt would be to throw his spear and rely on his sword instead, trying to use the shield to get close up where he'd have a considerable advantage, at least until the Samurai draws his sword.

>plays dead for 7seconds
pfft nothing personnel kid

200 bc japanese warrior VS 200 BC gallic warrior
who would win

They were still in the stone age then so I would give it to the celts

t. Angus MacDonald

>Chinks invent martial arts
>No chink is a mixed martial arts world champion and will ever be
Really makes you think.

mixed martial arts is actually pretty big in japan. of course the Chinese have sanda which is mixed martial arts with slightly different rules

And a samurai trained to lay his life down for his master fears death?

A samurai who fears dishonor more than death, that's the samurai your talking about?

Celt would get fucked

Are we debating fantasy warriors or things that actually existed?

Celts have no master beside themselves while Samurais are born-slaves which must follow their masters even in death

And Celt fear nothing , while Samurai fear

Celts are superior to slaves

>chink
>Japanese

Pick one

Celts were expert 1on1 fighters. He would mop the floor with the jap.

chink gook nip same shit same smell

Why does his have such a hate boner for samurai?

They are memes

Samurai, and im a huge Celtboo.

But you must distinguish between naked celt or mailed celt, because the mailed one would do much better.