The one person who could've stopped the eternal anglo

>the one person who could've stopped the eternal anglo

Another petit caporal will rise eventually. It's a question of time.

I'm pleased to remain so high in your esteem as to dominate your imagination without effort.

...

He got the last laugh by having intercourse with a British teen on st helens

>Implying anyone can stop the Anglo

they're welcome to try! many have!

from 1066 on, back to back never invaded champs!

dude you got invaded by tulip farmers lmao

I was expecting this mistaken belief to promptly rear itself.

I was hoping you people had done a little bit of homework since the last time you were told why this wasn't the case.

England was colonized by the dutch.

the anglo is eternal BECAUSE they raped him.

>i-i-it wasn't an invasion c-c-cuz we INVITED DEM IN, yeah t-that's it fucking ameriscum

so you're saying that the french created their own worst enemy?

fancy that!

And I was hoping you would promptly rear an argument.

lol

So we could have eternal frencho instead? No thanks

none of that comment chain was a proper argument, just brainless banter, so don't bitch.

>posts an anglo
Oh wew

He lost, but I gotta hand it to him, he did better than Hitler.

Aight man

Thats not Sultan Erdogan

Kill yourself

>looks at picture of modern london

yeah id say you got invaded

stop being racist

If he had won then withou a doubt the french would become the "eternal frog" of europe

Eternal Anglo is by far the most benevolent though. Frenchies spread communism and socialism. Germans spread genocidal autism. Italians/Spanish/Portuguese spread lazy halfbreeds.

Napoleon at one point in his youth wanted to work for the English navy because he believed they had a better chance of granting Corsica independence

>winner of an anglo civil war
>creates the biggest anglo power in the current age
ayy lmao

Anglos just spread greed and capitalism. It's almost charming in its simplicity and lack of strong ideology.

>Eternal Anglo is by far the most benevolent though.
but their only successful colonies were the ones where they genocided the natives and filled the land with more anglos

there was no genocide of natives

they had largely died from disease introduced by the spanish

>usa
>anglo

>Indians were paid by the French to fuck with the colonies
>Get their shit wrecked as a result of France losing
>Indians were paid by the Brits to fuck with the colonies
>Get their shit wrecked as a result of Britain losing
>"""""Genocide"""""

anglos stand for nothing. They are basically more complex insects

>speaks english
>americans are more genetically english than the english

>what is australia
doesn't change my point either

>It's another british hate thread

wow look at all the historical discussion in here

This. I am so sick of this meme.
Were some people cruel to the native? Yes.
Were some murdered? Yes.

But the vast majority simply died from disease or inter tribal warfare, or more simply were just assimilated. Many times against their will, but it doesn't change the fact that they weren't genocided.

I can't speak for any other Americans, but in my own family history going back to colonization there were people from Surrey and Sutton

butthurt much ?

...

>It's not genocide because there could have been *even more* to kill and displace if their population hadn't crashed earlier

>It's almost charming in its simplicity and lack of strong ideology.
A lack of a strong ideology is a good thing.

You realise Capitalist democracy is an ideology, right?