So why did the allies claim to want to 'liberate europe' whilst letting half of it fall to communism?

so why did the allies claim to want to 'liberate europe' whilst letting half of it fall to communism?

Google Operation Unthinkable. The Soviet conquest was a fait accompli and the West didn't have the will to overthrow them.

the CCCP was actually a formidable enemy, unlike Hitler and his motley crew

so why did the allies claim to want to 'liberate europe' whilst letting half of it fall to liberalism?

Patton wanted to invade the Socialist held area though.

why was he assassinated, Veeky Forums?

you really couldnt go the 4 minutes this thread has been up to plug your bullshit into it, huh

jews

What do you mean "letting half of it fall to communism"? They would have prevented that if they could have, but they didn't have the strength.

why did the axis claim to want to "liberate europe" from lesser races whilst letting it fall to communism and liberalism?

Over the course of its history, the United States has destroyed Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Imperial Germany, the Soviet Union, and literally all of the colonial empires in Western Europe.

The secret is patience.

The US typically breaks a world power's shit every 50 years or so.

Doing the Axis and the USSR one after the other would simply be too rapid.

>stated he was willing and able to push the Russian communists back, due to his rank and pull within the military his opinion would have to be considered- this also would put a public spotlight on Truman and Eisenhower's conflicting opinions
>vocally expressed disgust at the Jewish community's demands and person after meeting them
>allowed government employees who held Nazi membership to continue to work within the government (which was fine, everyone had to be a Nazi in order to work in the government)
He pissed off too many interested parties.

>liberalism is bad
Just stop making yourself look so silly.

The only person who is silly is a man who uses that term seriously.

>assassinated

You are a retard

Nice, please tell me why all of the current 1st world nations are uniformally use liberalism as a basis for their form of government.

America still does the same thing today with Middle Eastern countries. "Liberation" is just a pretext to do whatever.

Because the USSR was too powerful

>let it fall

It was a popular movement pretty much everywhere it took hold. The only places where it had to be enforced were Bulgaria, Romania and Germany.

Adolf Rothschild

This is literally what the Cold War is about unless you're American
Also
>if hitler wanted to save the german people from dependence on foreign goods then why did he stay allied with the USSR for most of the war

>man whose entire career was spent driving 30 ton tanks on various terrains and in inclement weather dies crashing his jeep

Uh huh

its pretty safe inside a tank

>operation unthinkable

You mean the theoretical concept that never happened?

Churchill was talking friendly with Stalin since 1940 and they'd agreed to surrender half of Europe to Stalin since 1943. Anglos don't give a shit about Slavs, Perfudious Albion just wanted to curb stomp Germany cause they didn't want a powerful European country to rise and challenge them and the Jews.

>them and the Jews
>implying that anglos aren't a type of jews

Well, if you crash a tank into a tree you knock over the tree. If you crash a jeep into a tree you wrap the jeep around the tree. Also, there were a shit ton of drunk drivers at that place and time.

>Communists are this delusional

Suuuuuure, leftypol, it was so goddamn popular in Poland and the baltics.