What happened to italy after WWII?

Italy pretty much cost Germany the war because they were shitty fighters and wanted Africa, and Germany backed them up because they needed the Mediterranean secured.

After they lost, Italian Communists/Anarchists took control. They drug Musso through the streets and beat him to death like animals, then hung his body for the world to see the death of Fascism.

National Socialism was superior in every way because the ideas were far, far advanced and they accomplished WAY more in science and stuff - while Fascism was really just a reactionary ideology to (((Communism))) and (((Capitalism))) (usury, not free markets or self ownership).
>Race is a bullshit social concept.
anti-science, anti-reality Commie delusional thinking.
>How would you classify an Ethiopia?
There are 3 races and the rest are mutts created the last 5000yrs or so. But in reality Icelanders compared to say Pygmies or Aborigines-Australia are all so far apart genetically that in any other class of animal they would be called a different species. Race = sub species.

I understand what you're saying but I'm saying that so much interbreeding has occurred over the centuries that there are way too many ethnicities that don't fit comfortably within one race.

But Romania's fascists literally participated in the Holocaust?

>what happened to italian fascism?

after they stabbed germany in the back, they pretendet that their fascism never existed

You are confusing sub-species and race, retard.

He's retarded, here is the truth. The old-school mega races (negroid/black, white/caucasoid, etc...) are indeed invalid and you could call them social constructs. They're useful perhaps in categorizing skull shapes as the like but don't correspond well to genetic categories. ie: some south asians and islander who look negroid but are more Asian genetically. However, human biodiversity is real . What we actually have are more localized populations. If you want to learn more about human biodiversity from a culture-gene co-evolution perspective look up peter frost, hbdchick, and other hbdbloggers. They explain population differences. If you want general population genetics stuff, look up the anthromadness blog.

>anthromadness.blogspot.com/2017/01/human-genetic-diversity-discrete-or.html?m=1

Germany cost Germany the war. Stop pinning your eternal failings on Italians, hans.

Romanians themselves have suffered alot at the hands of foreigners. Why feel "collective guilt" over something you personally had nothing to do with when your own ancestors literally suffered?

>what happened to italy after WWII?
Italy loses its colonies, holds its first universal suffrage and becomes a Republic. Because of the involvement of communism in the partisans that fought against fascism, Italy comes up with the biggest European communist party on the West side of the Berlin Wall. Preventing the commies from taking over the country will keep fascists old and new, Americans and Catholics quite busy all the way to the eighties, plus the third party has Socialist in its name: Insane terrorism all over the place in the 70s-80s ("anni di piombo:" ), and the USSR being retarded in general and with Czechoslovakia in 1968 in particular (the moment communism stopped being fashionable among left-oriented intellectuals) lead to an eventual "historical compromise" between the commies and their main opponent, Democrazia Cristiana. At this point you can no longer tell so-called Catholics and commies apart.

As the television is introduced, Italians begin to learn and speak the Italian language, a fact that is little known among foreigners, and that frustrates people who wish to learn Italian in order read Dante, Machiavelli and others in their original languages.

The anni di piombo and the ever present fighting against organized crime ultimately lead to Italy's perfect record against contemporary Islamic terrorism, as camel-fucking towelheads have yet to prove they can circumvent Italy's multiple police forces like they did in Bruxelles, Berlin, London...

>how did they get to where they are now?
It's a miracle there is such a thing as an Italian nation after all it went through, but somehow it happened.

>what happened to italian fascism?
It is constitutionally forbidden to resurrect the original party. The relevant keyword being 'original.'

Present-day neo-fascists are subhuman trash indistinguishable from antifa, raised in a particular family environment ideologizing them since birth. It's almost like a genetic disease.

but the Axis would have won without Italy

>lead to Italy's perfect record against contemporary Islamic terrorism

I'm not 100% sure that it isn't just

>why the fuck would be bomb Italy
>who would even care

>what happened to italian fascism?

The Italian Social Movement, the effective successor to the Republican and National Fascist Parties was still a force in Italian politics until the 1980s, polling in the mid teens.

After he was deposed by the King, rescued, adn sent back to Italy there was an Italian civil war between Fascists, commies, and normies. All Fascists are dead.

hmmm.

Stalin was never dictator of the USSR, he was chairman of the party. The head of state was actually kalinin.

Mussolini was actually the prime minister and had a parliament he was the duce of the Fascist party and thus the parliament made up of Fascists had to obey is orders. However Mussolini was easily removed by King via the constitution. The king was the Head of Government and Mussolini would not obtain this title until the Italian Social Republic.

Adolf Hitler was Fuhrer of the National Socialist party and Chancellor of the German Realm. In 1934 the presidency was left vacant out of respect for Hindenberg via referendum and Hitler's title officailly was Chancellor of Germany and Fuhrer of the NSDAP.

Is that book for retards or 8th graders or something?

It also addresses Emperor Shōwa as Hirohito, which is rude

Did he at least make the trains run on time, or is that just a meme?

Reminder that Mussolini was first to destabilize the international status quo by attacking and outright annexing a League of Nations member

You'd have a point if no attempt was discovered, but considering a new cell is discovered literally every other week (for example the plan to bomb Rialto and San Marco for easter), it's pretty damn hard not to give credit to the italian police forces.

>Stalin was never dictator of the USSR

>Rome and the Vatican
>not worth bombing

>Rome
>worth bombing
you mean this dutch settlement of a city?

>the Axis would have won if they had less manpower

He wasn't. He was in charge of the party, not of the state. That was a different guy.
Like president and prime minister.

He was still de facto autocrat of USSR

But his title wasn't "dictator of the USSR", like he is often shown.
I've yet to see some russian propaganda calling Churchill tzar of England, in a similar fashion.

Are you shitposting or pretending to be stupid? It was largely a ceremonial office. True leaders were usually general/first secretaries of the communist party. It was also like this in satellite states.

Yes but in most Communist states, he who controls the party controls the country. Kalinin only had titular status, and if he had made any attempt to undermine the authority of Stalin he would have ended up in a gulag or more likely shot.

So he was a dictator in the sense that he exercised full control over the party, and the party exercised full control over the state.

Italy took Germany into the war in North Africa and Greece (though Greece turned out to be a great success for Germany, nonetheless)

He was not dictator in the sense of schoolbooks saying "dictator" was his job and title, as seen here.

>Are you shitposting or pretending to be stupid?
By being objectively correct? Neither.

You're fucking stupid

It was screwing with the Soviets that really fucked over Germany.

You are objectively wrong :)

No your autistic and can't see the context that it is written in

The context is a school book where they are written with their titles His is written wrong, because your idiocy is contagious.

Thanks for proving my point. It's written that way to show that he was an evil bastard

>its intentionally wrong, which makes it correct

Not only are you not certain its intentionally wrong, as it is a popular misconception, but even if it was you'd still be wrong to repeat it, and of course be wrong for calling me stupid just for knowing the real job he held.

Dictator isn't a held post. You can be a monarch, head of state, prime minister or whatever and still be called a dictator.

Dude stop arguing with the autist.

It's written fine for showing that he was defacto head leader of the Soviets. You're being semantic.

Hitler is written as chairman of the party and the leader of the state.
Stalin is written as just the head of the state, when he was just the chairman of the party.

The image is wrong, and you are defending something wrong for absolutely no reason here. I can't even understand why you are so passionate about defending a mistake.

>>when you realize mussolini was a good guy pushed into joining up with the bad guys
The man literally founded fascism by beating up farmers and pouring oil down their throats

>what happened to italy after WWII?
Italy became an american colony

>what happened to italian fascism?
it remained a meme

>colony

>Stalin is written as just the head of the state, when he was just the chairman of the party.

Actually it just says dictator. It doesn't mention party or the state.

Finally got him to shut up lmao